Negative Energy of Bound Bodies & Hydrogen Atom

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of negative energy associated with bound systems, specifically focusing on planetary bodies and the hydrogen atom. Participants explore the implications of negative energy in classical mechanics and general relativity, as well as its relation to theoretical constructs like wormholes.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions the meaning of total negative energy in bound systems, noting that an isolated hydrogen atom should not be considered bound.
  • Another participant explains that in classical mechanics, the zero point of energy is arbitrary, and thus the distinction between positive and negative energy is also arbitrary.
  • It is suggested that the total energy of the hydrogen atom is negative because it represents the energy released when an electron is added to a proton, similar to gravitational potential energy in celestial systems.
  • A participant introduces the concept of wormholes, indicating that they require a different kind of negative energy than that associated with bound systems.
  • One participant provides an analogy comparing energy to water, arguing that while energy can be described in negative terms in certain contexts, it is fundamentally positive except for gravitational energy, which is inherently negative.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the nature of negative energy, particularly regarding its application to isolated systems like the hydrogen atom. There is no consensus on the interpretation of negative energy in relation to wormholes and other theoretical constructs.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the dependence on definitions of energy and the arbitrary nature of energy reference points in classical mechanics. The discussion also touches on unresolved aspects of negative energy in the context of theoretical physics.

SANGHERA.JAS
Messages
50
Reaction score
0
What is meant by total negative energy associated with bound bodies like planets. and also total energy of the hydrogen atom is negative. I wonder how it could be? Because I believe whatever negative energy may be, It must only be associated with bound systems, and I don't think that an isolated H-atom (as what we assume during its derivation) is bound to anything. Finally how it differs from negative energy associated with warm holes?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In classical mechanics the zero point of energy is arbitrary - and consequently the distinction between positive and negative energy is arbitrary.

Recall a ball near the surface of the Earth has potential energy approximately m*g*h (m=mass, g=acceleration due to gravity=9.8m/s^2, h=height). Where do we measure the height from? The ground? The center of the earth? The table the ball is sitting on?
It doesn't matter! These will all give different potential energies, but only differences in energy are physical.

That being said we conventionally for gravity and electrostatics we take the zero of energy as when all the particles are infinitely far from each other (because potential energy drops off as 1/r).

So for example consider the sun and Earth system, this has some negative gravitational potential energy, -E. E is the energy that would be released in moving the Earth from infinitely far away (through free space) to its current distance from the sun.
Conversely E is the energy that would be required to push the Earth out of the sun's influence.

Now consider an isolated H-atom - it is a bounded system. The electron is bound to the proton! (In a very similar way to how the Earth is bound to the Sun). What you would call the total energy is the energy released when we add an electron to a proton to make Hydrogen. Conversely it is the energy required to rip an electron away from the hydrogen atom.

I have no idea what a warm hole is, but I assume it's a whole different kettle of fish.
 
fantispug said:
I have no idea what a warm hole is, but I assume it's a whole different kettle of fish.
Thank You for yours reply.
In general relativity there are three type of extreme bodies, theoratically predicted. One is black hole which you already know, second is white hole in which nothing can ever fall and hence "white" & third is warm hole, which has some properties which allow time travel. Theorist like THOMAS A. ROMAN and LAWRENCE H. FORD have predicted that to create a warm hole we will require negative energy which is different from negative energy mentioned above.
Followhttp://www.sciamdigital.com/index.cfm?fa=Products.ViewIssue&ISSUEID_CHAR=82D7E940-CBFE-4BD2-989F-A47BDEAACE1"
and read article Negative Energy, Wormholes and Warp Drive.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
energy is neither created nor destoyed. it merely moves from place to place and changes form. think of energy as being like water. we can move it from place to place and freeze or evaporiate it but the total amount remains the same. when measuring the level of wtater in a lake we can assign any number we want to any given level of water. if we assign a positive number to one level then it entirely possible that later the watter may drop to a level where we need negative numbers to describe it. but the water itself is always positive. there are no negative sheep and there is no negative water. the exception is energy stored in gravitational fields. this energy (and no other) is inherently negative. it has to be for the total energy of a gravitationally bound system to be conserved. energy stored in other kinds of fields is positive.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
12
Views
3K