Negative volume using washer method

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the volume of a solid formed by rotating the area between the curves y = -x^2 and y = -2x around the x-axis. Participants clarify that the integral should be set up as V = π ∫[0 to 2] ((-2x)^2 - (-x^2)^2) dx to avoid negative volume results. The confusion arises from determining which function is the upper and lower bound, especially since both functions are negative in the specified interval. It is suggested to visualize the solid formed by rotation to better understand the bounds. Ultimately, reflecting the functions across the x-axis simplifies the problem and avoids complications in identifying the upper and lower curves.
terryds
Messages
392
Reaction score
13

Homework Statement


What is the volume of a solid formed by the area trapped between y= -x^2 and y= -2x rotated 360° around x-axis?

Homework Equations


V = ∫A(x)dx

The Attempt at a Solution


y=y
-x^2 = -2x
x^2 -2x = 0
x(x-2) = 0

This means that the two functions cross at x = 0 and x = 2
From x = 0 to x = 2 , y = -x^2 will be the upper bound

So, the volume is
## V = \pi \int_{0}^{2}((-x^2)^2-(-2x)^2))dx = \pi \int_{0}^{2}(x^4 - 4x^2)dx = \pi \left [ \frac{1}{5}x^5-\frac{4}{3}x^3 \right ]^2_0 = \pi (\frac{32}{5}-\frac{32}{3})=-4\frac{4}{15}\pi ##

Why do I get negative sign?? What's wrong??
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Because x(x-2) is negative in your specified interval. x^2 is the lower curve!
 
Orodruin said:
Because x(x-2) is negative in your specified interval. x^2 is the lower curve!
So, to determine which one is upper, we need to see which one is at the top at y positive area (by visualizing rotating it) ?
In other words,
if y < 0 then the upper bound is actually the bottom curve and the lower bound is the top one ??
if y > 0, we just see which one at the top/bottom to decide which one is upper/lower bound..

Is it right?
 
terryds said:
So, to determine which one is upper, we need to see which one is at the top at y positive area (by visualizing rotating it) ?
In other words,
if y < 0 then the upper bound is actually the bottom curve and the lower bound is the top one ??
if y > 0, we just see which one at the top/bottom to decide which one is upper/lower bound..

Is it right?
I don't think -x^2 is the bottom function, but make sure you understand what solid is being formed when you rotate R around the x-axis. Look at one arbitrary x-value and see what happens when you rotate it around the x-axis, and first see what kind of solid you get.
 
  • Like
Likes terryds
terryds said:
So, to determine which one is upper, we need to see which one is at the top at y positive area (by visualizing rotating it) ?
In other words,
if y < 0 then the upper bound is actually the bottom curve and the lower bound is the top one ??
if y > 0, we just see which one at the top/bottom to decide which one is upper/lower bound..

Is it right?
This is more complicated than it needs to be. Because you're squaring the y-values, the squared y-value on the line is larger than the squared y-value on the parabola, so your integral should be ##\int_0^2 (-2x)^2 - (-x^2)^2 dx## to produce a reasonable (i.e., nonnegative) volume.

The region being revolved is equal in area to the region defined by the curves ##y = x^2## and y = 2x, and would make for a simpler integral.
 
  • Like
Likes terryds and Thewindyfan
Mark44 said:
This is more complicated than it needs to be. Because you're squaring the y-values, the squared y-value on the line is larger than the squared y-value on the parabola, so your integral should be ##\int_0^2 (-2x)^2 - (-x^2)^2 dx## to produce a reasonable (i.e., nonnegative) volume.

The region being revolved is equal in area to the region defined by the curves ##y = x^2## and y = 2x, and would make for a simpler integral.
I looked at this incorrectly earlier but I think the OP's mistake was that you had y =-2x be the bottom function instead of the top function.
The easiest way to tell which function is on top of which for problems like these, since that's probably the only challenging part of these problems for most people when it comes to graphing and seeing how the area looks like, is to plug in values between the two points that the curves intersect. Be especially wary about how the area between two curves looks when you have some function like sin or cosine, because you can end up with two integrals if the two curves switch in their orientation to each other (i.e. from 0 to π/4, cos(x) is above sin(x) but from π/4 to π/2, sin(x) is above cos(x)).
 
Thewindyfan said:
I looked at this incorrectly earlier but I think the OP's mistake was that you had y =-2x be the bottom function instead of the top function.
y = -2x is the "bottom" function relative to ##y = -x^2##. However, once you square both of these, then ##(-x^2)^2 \le (-2x)^2## on the interval in question.
Thewindyfan said:
The easiest way to tell which function is on top of which for problems like these, since that's probably the only challenging part of these problems for most people when it comes to graphing and seeing how the area looks like, is to plug in values between the two points that the curves intersect. Be especially wary about how the area between two curves looks when you have some function like sin or cosine, because you can end up with two integrals if the two curves switch in their orientation to each other (i.e. from 0 to π/4, cos(x) is above sin(x) but from π/4 to π/2, sin(x) is above cos(x)).
The simplest thing to do, IMO, for problems such as the one in this thread, is to work with the functions reflected across the x-axis. The area of the region being revolved is the same, and you don't have the complication of figuring out which function is on the bottom.
 
  • Like
Likes terryds
Mark44 said:
The simplest thing to do, IMO, for problems such as the one in this thread, is to work with the functions reflected across the x-axis. The area of the region being revolved is the same, and you don't have the complication of figuring out which function is on the bottom.

I agree with this, I did so without even mentioning it, which is why x^2 is my bottom function. The easier way of looking at this is to consider the volume as the difference between two rotational volumes. It then becomes very clear which is which.
 
  • Like
Likes terryds

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 105 ·
4
Replies
105
Views
6K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K