Nernst equation - Lambda Sensor

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around the behavior of lambda sensors, specifically why the characteristic voltage curve flattens in the rich region (lambda<1). It is suggested that this flattening may be linked to the maximum conductivity of the electrolyte, although this explanation lacks depth. Participants note that the Nernst equation primarily describes the lambda>=1 region and does not adequately explain the behavior in the rich region. There is also curiosity about the observed decrease in the flattened part of the curve with increasing temperature, despite the expectation that higher temperatures would enhance conductivity and voltage. The conversation highlights that while conductivity generally increases with temperature for some materials, it can decrease for others, complicating the relationship between temperature, conductivity, and voltage in lambda sensors. Additionally, the dynamics of oxygen and hydrogen transport are mentioned as factors influencing the sensor's response.
H3ll4s
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hello everyone,

I am not sure if this question is comfortable in the chemistry section but I will try my luck. I have been dealing with lambda sensors a little bit and when I look at the characteristic voltage lambda curve I keep asking myself why it flatens out when getting into the rich (lambda<1) region. I have read somewhere that it is due to the maximum electrolyte's conductivity, which makes sense but is not very satisfying. My question is whether or not this statement is correct and by which equation it can be described. I see so many plotted curves but nowhere any clues how they did it . Just a mention of the nernst equation, which only describes the part lambda>=1 (right?). And if someone also knows why the flatened part (lambda<1) decreases with increasing temperature (increase in temperature should mean increase in conductivity, thus higher voltage to my understanding) I would be very thankful.

Thanks in advance
John
wide_b1.jpg
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
H3ll4s said:
(snip) ... why it flatens out when getting into the rich (lambda<1) region. I have read somewhere that it is due to the maximum electrolyte's conductivity, which makes sense but is not very satisfying. My question is whether or not this statement is correct and by which equation it can be described.
An equation to describe oxygen transport through an uncharacterized solid electrolyte? Should be good for a Master's for you.
H3ll4s said:
I see so many plotted curves but nowhere any clues how they did it . Just a mention of the nernst equation, which only describes the part lambda>=1 (right?).
The plots are of real measurements, "this vs. that."
H3ll4s said:
And if someone also knows why the flatened part (lambda<1) decreases with increasing temperature (increase in temperature should mean increase in conductivity, thus higher voltage to my understanding) I would be very thankful.
Conductivity increases with T for some materials, and decreases for others. Oxygen transport should be increasing, and hydrogen transport should be increasing in the opposite direction, perhaps more quickly than the oxygen transport.
 
I came.across a headline and read some of the article, so I was curious. Scientists discover that gold is a 'reactive metal' by accidentally creating a new material in the lab https://www.earth.com/news/discovery-that-gold-is-reactive-metal-by-creating-gold-hydride-in-lab-experiment/ From SLAC - A SLAC team unexpectedly formed gold hydride in an experiment that could pave the way for studying materials under extreme conditions like those found inside certain planets and stars undergoing...

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
9K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 70 ·
3
Replies
70
Views
6K
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K