Net force on a charge in a square

In summary, you are calculating the net force on q4 due to the other charges in the corner of a square. You found the length of the diagonal line toward q4 which is 025738684 m, and you applied this to the previous calculation that you did wrong. You also found the angle of q2 to be 90° because it is a negative force and therefore repels away from the negative force of q4.
  • #1
paytona
11
0

Homework Statement


There are 4 charges in the corner of a square with the lengths of the sides measuring 18.2cm
q1= 2.34μC (top left) q2=-1.58μC (top right) q3= 2.03μC (bottom left) q4= -3.00μC (bottom right)

→Calculate net force on q4
→Calculate net force at the center of the square


Homework Equations


Fnet=|KQ|/r^2
K constant = 8.99x10^9

The Attempt at a Solution



q1= [(8.99x10^9)(2.34x10^-6)]/(0.182)^2 = 635086.3422 @ 315°
q2= [(8.99x10^9)(1.58x10^-6)]/(0.182)^2 = 428818.9832 @270°
q3= [(8.99x10^9)(2.03x10^-6)]/(0.182)^2 = 550950.9721 @ 0°

for my next step I was going to calculate x and y components and then plug it into the
d=*sqrt [(x^2)+(y^2)]

to calculate net force on q4... but I'm very uncertain about how to continue or if my previous calculations are even right.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
You're on the right track. If you calculate the components for each, then you can find the magnitude from the addition of all those components.

Remember to watch your signs on the components too. Also, for the calculation of the force of q1, there's an error in the value for the separation -- you want to use the length of a diagonal instead of a side length.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
  • #3
jackarms said:
You're on the right track. If you calculate the components for each, then you can find the magnitude from the addition of all those components.

Remember to watch your signs on the components too. Also, for the calculation of the force of q1, there's an error in the value for the separation -- you want to use the length of a diagonal instead of a side length.

do I square the distance anyway?
 
  • #4
Yes, you want to square the distance, but use the length of the diagonal for the force from q1.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
  • #5
Solution??

paytona said:

Homework Statement


There are 4 charges in the corner of a square with the lengths of the sides measuring 18.2cm
q1= 2.34μC (top left) q2=-1.58μC (top right) q3= 2.03μC (bottom left) q4= -3.00μC (bottom right)

→Calculate net force on q4
→Calculate net force at the center of the square


Homework Equations


Fnet=|KQ|/r^2
K constant = 8.99x10^9

The Attempt at a Solution



q1= [(8.99x10^9)(2.34x10^-6)]/(0.182)^2 = 635086.3422 @ 315°
q2= [(8.99x10^9)(1.58x10^-6)]/(0.182)^2 = 428818.9832 @270°
q3= [(8.99x10^9)(2.03x10^-6)]/(0.182)^2 = 550950.9721 @ 0°

for my next step I was going to calculate x and y components and then plug it into the
d=*sqrt [(x^2)+(y^2)]

to calculate net force on q4... but I'm very uncertain about how to continue or if my previous calculations are even right.

Ok so this is what I did
→ Using pythagoreon theorem I found the length of the diagonal line toward q4 which = 025738684 m

I applied this to the previous calculation that I did wrong. But also, wouldn't the angle of q2 be 90° because it is a negative force and therefore repels away from the negative force of q4?

Anyway this is what I did
q1= [(8.99x10^9)(2.34x10^-6)]/(0.25738684)^2 = 317543.2411 @ 315°
q2= [(8.99x10^9)(1.58x10^-6)]/(0.182)^2 = 428818.9832 @90°
q3= [(8.99x10^9)(2.03x10^-6)]/(0.182)^2 = 550950.9721 @ 0°

X and Y components:
E1 -- x: 224536.9791 y: -224536.9791
E2 -- x: 0 y: 428818.9832
E3 -- x: 55090.9721 y: 0

I then added the x components and the y components to calculate E4
x: 775487.9512 y: 204282.0041

I then used the distance formula to calculate the net field on E4:
FnetE4: *sqrt [(775487.9512^2)+(204282.0041^2)]
FnetE4: 801943.0776C ?


Do I still need to calculate the angle?
I did but it doesn't seem right.

Angle tan -1:y/x
=204282.0041/775487.9512
=14.8°
 
  • #6
That all looks right for the most part, but because you calculated the net field due to all the charges, you have to multiply by q4 to get the net force.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
  • #7
paytona said:
I then added the x components and the y components to calculate E4
x: 775487.9512 y: 204282.0041
You mean, the field at q4 due to the other three charges, right?
I then used the distance formula to calculate the net field on E4:
FnetE4: *sqrt [(775487.9512^2)+(204282.0041^2)]
FnetE4: 801943.0776C ?
Distance formula? C?
You are asked for the force on q4, but it looks to me that you have only got as far as the field.
Do I still need to calculate the angle?
I did but it doesn't seem right.

Angle tan -1:y/x
=204282.0041/775487.9512
=14.8°
Why does that seem wrong?
 
  • #8
haruspex said:
You mean, the field at q4 due to the other three charges, right?
Distance formula? C?
You are asked for the force on q4, but it looks to me that you have only got as far as the field.

Why does that seem wrong?
Yes the charge on q4 due to the other 3.
So I would use F=qE to calculate the net force on it right?
It just seems wrong because the direction would be north east?
 
  • #9
So then to calculate the net force at the center of the square I've taken half of the distance I had for the charge of q1 -> q4 = 25.738684 / 2 = 12.869342cm

So to calculate the center force I used the formula

Fnet= |Kq1q2|/r2 once for the left side and once for the right side of the square

so Fnet on the left side was =0.042704298 and =.0426126

I am a little lost how to continue or if that is even right... Any help is appreciated!
 
  • #10
Yes, you have to do F = qE to get the net force. Also keep in mind that since q4 is negative, the force will be in the opposite direction as the field, so the force will actually be southeast.

And for the center of the square, it doesn't make since to calculate the force at the center of it, since there's nothing in the center to have a force exerted upon it. I assume it means field, so use the field equation. And I don't really understand your process. What do you mean by the left half and the right half of the square? Shouldn't you calculate the fields from each of the four charges and then add them up?
 
  • #11
paytona said:
It just seems wrong because the direction would be north east?
Yes, but that's the field. The charge q4 is negative, so the force will point...?
 

FAQ: Net force on a charge in a square

1. What is the definition of net force on a charge in a square?

The net force on a charge in a square is the sum of all the individual forces acting on the charge within the square. This includes both the magnitude and direction of each force.

2. How is the net force on a charge in a square calculated?

The net force on a charge in a square is calculated using the principle of vector addition. This means that the individual forces acting on the charge are added together in a vector form to determine the net force.

3. What factors affect the net force on a charge in a square?

The net force on a charge in a square can be affected by the magnitude and direction of the individual forces acting on the charge, as well as the distance between the charge and the other objects in the square.

4. How does the net force on a charge in a square affect the motion of the charge?

The net force on a charge in a square will determine the acceleration of the charge. If the net force is zero, the charge will remain at rest or continue moving at a constant velocity. If the net force is non-zero, the charge will accelerate in the direction of the net force.

5. Can the net force on a charge in a square be negative?

Yes, the net force on a charge in a square can be negative if the individual forces acting on the charge are in opposite directions. This means that the net force will be in the direction of the smaller force, but with a negative value to indicate the opposite direction.

Similar threads

Back
Top