What is the net electrostatic force of the sphere at the origin?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves three charged metal spheres arranged in an equilateral triangle in the xy plane, with a focus on determining the net electrostatic force acting on the sphere located at the origin.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the application of Coulomb's law to calculate forces between the spheres, with one participant attempting to compute the force vectors based on given charges and distances. Questions arise regarding the correct interpretation of angles and the nature of the spheres (conducting vs. non-conducting).

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants providing insights and corrections regarding the calculations and assumptions made about the spheres. Some participants express uncertainty about the implications of the spheres being conducting and the uniformity of charge distribution.

Contextual Notes

There is a mention of potential confusion regarding the angles in the problem, with participants clarifying that the angles should be 60 degrees rather than 90 degrees. Additionally, the nature of the spheres (conducting or non-conducting) is under scrutiny, which may affect the problem's complexity.

Rijad Hadzic
Messages
321
Reaction score
20

Homework Statement


Three charged metal spheres are arrayed in the xy plane so that they form an eqilateral triangle. What is the net electrostatic force on the sphere at the origin?
http://imgur.com/a/4XnoO (sorry I forgot to put this but the angles are 90 for each vertex, which should be implied when the problem said equilateral )

Homework Equations



kqQ/r^2

The Attempt at a Solution



Sorry guys. My book doesn't have an answer for this question and I just wanted to make sure I'm doing it right.

So first I start with the origin sphere and the other sphere on the x axis.

I use kqQ/r^2

(8.99x10^9)(5.5x10^-9)(3x10^-9) / (12x10^-2)^2 = 1.03x10^-5 C

So this will be a force vector going in the positive x axis

Now since the origin has a negative charge, and the top sphere has a negative charge, the force vector here is going to point in the opposite direction of the side of the triangle connecting the origin sphere and the top sphere, right? meaning its going to be going somewhere in the third quadrant?

I use kqQ/r^2 again

(8.99x10^9)(-5.5x10^-9)(-2.5x10^-9) / (12x10^-2)^2 = 8.58x10^-6 CSo the net electrostatic force of the sphere at the origin should be:

F_x = 1.03 x 10^-5 N - sin(30)8.58x10^-6 N

F_y = cos(30)8.58x10^-6 N

I drew a force diagram just so you guys will understand what I mean

http://imgur.com/a/5PeJM
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm not exactly following your train of thought, but I felt like drawing a picture to get a better idea of what you want to do. Basically, you want to find the sum of the vectors in this picture.

TRLCVlP.png


Start by identifying what distance to use for Coulomb's law.
 
Rijad Hadzic said:
Three charged metal spheres
Bad question. If they are conducting spheres the charge distributions on them will not remain uniform. The radii matter, and the problem becomes extremely difficult. It should specify either uniformly charged non-conducting spheres or point charges.
Rijad Hadzic said:
the angles are 90 for each vertex, which should be implied when the problem said equilateral
I think you mean 60.
Rijad Hadzic said:
F_y = cos(30)8.58x10^-6 N
Check the sign. Other than that, all looks good.
 
haruspex said:
Bad question. If they are conducting spheres the charge distributions on them will not remain uniform. The radii matter, and the problem becomes extremely difficult. It should specify either uniformly charged non-conducting spheres or point charges.

I think you mean 60.

Check the sign. Other than that, all looks good.

Haha sorry. Yes I meant 60 degrees.

Ohh gotcha not sure how I didn't catch that. of course its going to be negative because its in the -j hat direction!

Thanks a lot.
 

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
9K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
8K