News Net Neutrality, the FCC, and you wake up

  • Thread starter Thread starter rhody
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Fcc Net
Click For Summary
The Federal Communications Commission's (FCC) net neutrality rules, effective November 20, prohibit internet providers from blocking or throttling access to content, particularly for heavy users like gamers and streamers. The regulations aim to ensure transparency and prevent discrimination against competing services, although they allow providers to manage network access. The rules were approved along party lines, facing opposition from Republican commissioners and Congress, who attempted to overturn them without success. Concerns persist regarding potential conflicts of interest for ISPs, particularly those with stakes in competing services. The debate highlights the need for oversight to maintain fair access to the internet, especially in areas with limited ISP options.
  • #31
rhody said:
Rubbing it in is only going to piss off the DSL folks like Turbo and company. Factoid.

Rhody...

I just ran the AT&T speed test on this desktop - 4.7 Mbps for downloads and .41 Mbps for uploads.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
WhoWee said:
I just ran the AT&T speed test on this desktop - 4.7 Mbps for downloads and .41 Mbps for uploads.

I ran speak easy last night from San Fran 29.3 Mb download and 5.7 Mb upload.

Rhody...
 
  • #33
Turbo,

The only way your access to the speeds that some of us enjoy is if your sparsely populated area suddenly were to grow to "cable customer access threshold limit exceeded dimensions". Say Caterpillar or other major manufacturer were to set up shop in your area. The explosion in the local population may be enough to convince the Cable providers to upgrade their service and as a direct result, you would benefit.

BTW. Is your ISP limiting your access now via DSL, what I am asking is what upload/download speeds are they providing, versus what they could be providing if they choose to do so ?

Rhody... :confused:
 
  • #34
rhody said:
BTW. Is your ISP limiting your access now via DSL, what I am asking is what upload/download speeds are they providing, versus what they could be providing if they choose to do so ?

Rhody... :confused:
Yes. I pay for 5Mbps and generally get only 3Mbps. TDS sells bandwidth that they cannot deliver, and throttles the customers to keep its traffic down. It's a cynical, unethical way to do business, but then the telecom industry is not known to be really concerned with ethics.
 
  • #35
turbo said:
Yes. I pay for 5Mbps and generally get only 3Mbps. TDS sells bandwidth that they cannot deliver, and throttles the customers to keep its traffic down. It's a cynical, unethical way to do business, but then the telecom industry is not known to be really concerned with ethics.

As silly as this sounds, if they changed their offer to the 3Mbps would that satisfy you ? I doubt it. Second, based on their technology, what is the best speed that could be achieved to their customer base ? Do noisy ancient phone lines contribute to the problem ? I imagine that they would.

Rhody...
 
  • #36
rhody said:
As silly as this sounds, if they changed their offer to the 3Mbps would that satisfy you ? I doubt it. Second, based on their technology, what is the best speed that could be achieved to their customer base ? Do noisy ancient phone lines contribute to the problem ? I imagine that they would.

Rhody...
They're probabaly oversubscribed since they're the only provider.
 
Last edited:
  • #37
rhody said:
As silly as this sounds, if they changed their offer to the 3Mbps would that satisfy you ? I doubt it. Second, based on their technology, what is the best speed that could be achieved to their customer base ? Do noisy ancient phone lines contribute to the problem ? I imagine that they would.

Rhody...
I live only a mile from the switch, and the copper pair comes up shining every time. The problem is not on my end. TDS http://www.tdstelecom.com/?eid=276&gclid=COeD3tz-1qsCFULe4AodLwT0TA sells more bandwidth than they can provide and throttles customers. This is not about net neutrality in the sense that an ISP throttles access to certain providers. My complaint is about dishonest ISPs that promise more bandwidth than they can possibly deliver and then throttle their clients to reduce their costs. If you are promising 5Mbsp to X customers, then you should be willing to pay for 5Mbps times X customers worth of traffic across the Internet's backbone. If not, you are cheating all the customers. Please watch "The Producers" to see how creeps use over-selling to enrich themselves.
 
  • #38
rhody said:
I ran speak easy last night from San Fran 29.3 Mb download and 5.7 Mb upload.

16.91 / 4.53 for me using Speakeasy.net, but that was from the nearest server (Dallas). From San Fran I get 16.91 / 4.53, which I really find spooky that it's exactly the same, unless they're fudging the test!

It's 16.2 / 4.1 using Speedtest.net.

turbo said:
My complaint is about dishonest ISPs that promise more bandwidth than they can possibly deliver and then throttle their clients to reduce their costs.

I thought that was happening with me when I moved here from Florida over the summer, but I discovered when I connect my computer directly to their DSL modem, I get 38 Mbps. The problem has something to do with my wireless router. Even connecting via a hardline with my router, I get the same problem, so it's not my wireless (I have G).

Of course I don't feel comfortable connecting directly to the Internet, so I accept the loss. For now.
 
  • #39
DoggerDan said:
\I thought that was happening with me when I moved here from Florida over the summer, but I discovered when I connect my computer directly to their DSL modem, I get 38 Mbps.
Their dsl modem? What do you mean?

Of course I don't feel comfortable connecting directly to the Internet, so I accept the loss. For now.
What do you mean "connect directly to the internet"?
 
  • #40
Evo said:
Their dsl modem? What do you mean?

My ISP's DSL modem. They own it. I rent it.

What do you mean "connect directly to the internet"?

As in the most direct route available, bypassing my wireless access point. I'm sure it goes through a few more connections handled by my ISP

Edit: ooops, I accidently edited your post, so sorry.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #41
DoggerDan said:
My ISP's DSL modem. They own it. I rent it.
ISP's don't have modems for dsl. You pay for shared connectivity to their service, along with all the rest of their customers.

As in the most direct route available, bypassing my wireless access point. I'm sure it goes through a few more connections handled by my ISP.
If you're using a wireless router at home, your connection still leaves your house via the phone line, same as if you just used your regular dsl modem/router. I've heard of people having issues with their wireless routers degrading service, but that's just at your house. You're still directly connecting to your ISP.
 
  • #42
Evo said:
ISP's don't have modems for dsl.

Yes they do. Here's the type of DSL modem I'm renting from my ISP: http://www.actiontec.com/products/product.php?pid=200

I don't use it's wireless feature as I don't trust its security, as per the recommendation of the installer, whose been working for my ISP for eighteen years.

If you're using a wireless router at home, your connection still leaves your house via the phone line...

That's how a DSL modem works.

I've heard of people having issues with their wireless routers degrading service, but that's just at your house. You're still directly connecting to your ISP.

No, I'm not. I'm connecting through my wireless router. My laptop is connected to my wireless router. The router is directly connected to my ISP's DSL modem. With my router in place, I get less than 20 Mbps. When I remove it, connecting my laptop directly to my ISP's DSL modem, the throughput jumps to more than 37 Mbps.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 114 ·
4
Replies
114
Views
14K
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
9K
  • · Replies 65 ·
3
Replies
65
Views
11K