Netforce of spring, hookes law. help

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a problem involving a pogo stick, specifically focusing on the application of Hooke's Law and net forces acting on a spring system. The original poster presents a scenario where a spring is compressed by a person jumping on a pogo stick, and seeks assistance in calculating the net upward force and the upward acceleration at maximum compression.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to calculate the net upward force by applying the spring force formula and subtracting the weight of the person. They express uncertainty regarding their calculations and seek clarification on how to approach the acceleration component of the problem.

Discussion Status

Some participants provide feedback on the calculations related to significant figures and confirm the correctness of the original poster's analysis. However, there is still uncertainty regarding the approach to calculating acceleration, with the original poster indicating a lack of familiarity with the necessary concepts.

Contextual Notes

The original poster mentions that they have not yet learned how to approach the acceleration calculation, indicating a potential gap in their understanding of the relevant physics concepts.

jim gerth
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


An "extreme" pogo stick utilizies a spring whose uncompressed length is 46 cm and whose force constant is 1.4 x 10^4 N/m (14000). A 60 kg enthusiast is jumping on the pogo stick, compressing the spring to a length of only 5.0 cm at the bottom of her jump, Calculate; a) The net upward force on her at the moment the spring reaches its greatest compression and b) her upward acceleration in m/s^2 and gs at that moment.

Any thoughts?
Thanks.

Homework Equations



F=-kx F=ma w=mg

The Attempt at a Solution


Ok so i started with multiplying the force constant and difference of distance . 14000 x (0.46 - 0.05) = 5740 then i subtracted the weight which is (60)(9.8)= 588 which gave me an answer of 5152. The answer in the book says 5100. I know with having 2 sig figs you could say it was 5100 but i am not sure if i went about this right.. and also don't know where to go with b especially if i did not get a correct.??

thanks everyone.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Having 2 significant figures with your final result does NOT give 5100. It gives 5200.

##
\vec{F}_{net} = \vec{F}_{spring} + \vec{F}_{person}
##
Both of which you stated the formulas for.
If you round both of your results with respect to the amount of significant figures before subtracting, you get 5100 ( after significant figures are applied to this as well, beforehand it is 5110)
That's the only thing "wrong" I see.

Your analysis was correct, however. What are your thoughts on the second portion (the acceleration)?
 
Last edited:
Thanks for the reply and clarification, Yeah sorry , i meant to say 5200.. and i have no idea how to approach the acceleration , we have yet to learn that. I've been checking everywhere on how to approach it but i don't even know where to start lol -____- answers in the back is 85 m/s^2 and 8.7 gs. i wish i could say my answers were even close .
 
lol i thought it was more than just that but nvm i got it . Thanks again
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
9K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K