Neutron contamination threshold in tissue using LINAC

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the threshold for neutron contamination in tissue when using Linear Accelerators (LINAC) in radiation therapy. Participants explore the safety regulations and recommendations regarding neutron exposure, particularly in the context of patient treatment and radiation protection standards.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant inquires about the existence of a regulated threshold for neutron contamination in tissue during LINAC use.
  • Another participant suggests conducting a Google search for existing information on neutron contamination thresholds.
  • A participant mentions that there is no known regulated threshold for neutron contamination, emphasizing that radiation protection limits are based on effective doses rather than a specific "safe" threshold.
  • It is noted that the ICRP recommends keeping effective doses below 1 mSv per year for the general public, while acknowledging that patient treatment involves higher doses.
  • The discussion highlights that neutron weighting factors vary with energy, with a peak around 1 MeV, and that efforts are made to keep exposures as low as reasonably achievable (ALARA).
  • Concerns are raised about the potential damage to implanted electronic devices from neutron exposure during high-energy treatments.
  • A reference to an old IEC standard proposing a maximum neutron dose limit of 0.5 mGy of neutrons per Gy of x-ray is mentioned, though its current relevance is questioned.
  • A link to an IAEA publication is provided, which contains information on photonuclear reaction thresholds relevant to the discussion.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express uncertainty regarding the existence of a universally accepted threshold for neutron contamination. There are multiple viewpoints on the safety and regulation of neutron exposure, with no consensus reached on a specific threshold or standard.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the lack of clarity on the current applicability of the IEC standard mentioned and the dependence on varying definitions of safety thresholds in radiation protection.

ifa23
Messages
8
Reaction score
1
Hello, I want to ask about neutron contamination threshold. Is there a threshold for neutron contamination in tissue used LINAC that is safe and has been regulated by an international organization? thanks for your help.
 
Biology news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF.

I did a Google search on threshold for neutron contamination in tissue and got lots of good hits. Maybe try that search yourself to see if you get what you need.
 
ifa23 said:
Is there a threshold for neutron contamination in tissue used LINAC that is safe and has been regulated by an international organization?
I haven't heard of such a thing.

When it comes to radiation protection, limits are established in terms of effective doses. These are tissue-weighted sums of equivalent doses. Equivalent doses are physical absorbed doses (energy per unit mass) weighted for stochastics effects (e.g. cancer induction). The weighting for neutrons is energy dependent and ranges roughly from 2-20 with a peak for kinetic energies around 1 MeV, compared to a weighting factor of 1 for photons.

The International Commission on Radiation Protection (ICRP) Report 103 (2007) recommends limiting effective doses to members of the general public to less than 1 mSv per year. This is relative to average background exposures of about 2-3 mSv per year (though this can fluctuate with factors such as geography).

Generally, in radiation protection, rather than declaring a "safe" threshold, we try to keep exposures ALARA--as low as reasonably achievable, social and economic factors considered. So in terms of linac shielding, we design facilities and processes to keep exposures well below the ICRP recommendations.

Patients irradiated by a linac are a different story. They need to receive quite high doses of radiation, and so protection limits don't apply. Historically there has been a reluctance to heavily modulate photon beams with energies in their spectra above 10 MeV to avoid producing neutrons, but more recently higher energy modulated treatments (VMAT or IMRT) are becoming more popular, particularly 10 MV beams without flattening filters, due to the high dose rates one can achieve with them. We also try to avoid irradiating patients with implanted electronic devices such as pacemakers with the higher energy beams, because neutrons can catastrophically damage the electronics.
 
  • Informative
Likes   Reactions: ifa23 and berkeman
An old IEC standard (International Electrotechnical Commission) has proposed a maximum neutron dose limit in the patient plane of 0.5 mGy of neutrons per Gy of x-ray. I don't know if this is still relevant.

In addition in term of energy, you have a large number of photonuclear reaction thresholds in this IAEA publication (starting from page 95),
https://www-pub.iaea.org/MTCD/publications/PDF/te_1178_prn.pdf
 
Last edited:
  • Informative
Likes   Reactions: ifa23

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 37 ·
2
Replies
37
Views
7K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
6K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K