How to Solve the Neutrons in a One-Dimensional Box Problem?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Domnu
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Box Neutrons
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves one thousand neutrons confined in a one-dimensional box, with a specific wave function given at time t=0. Participants are tasked with normalizing the wave function, determining the number of particles in a specific interval, identifying particles with a certain energy level, and calculating the average energy.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss normalizing the wave function and the implications of the box's boundaries. There are attempts to express the wave function in terms of eigenstates and Fourier series. Questions arise about the correct approach to find the number of particles at a specific energy level and the evaluation of integrals related to the wave function.

Discussion Status

Some participants suggest using a Fourier expansion of the wave function, while others explore the momentum space approach. There is recognition that a discrete Fourier series may simplify the problem. Guidance is offered on evaluating coefficients for the wave function expansion, although challenges remain in the evaluation of integrals and approximations.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the need to consider the wave function's behavior outside the defined box, as well as the discrete nature of energy levels in the context of quantum mechanics. There is a focus on the mathematical representation of the wave function and its implications for particle distribution.

Domnu
Messages
176
Reaction score
0
Problem
One thousand neutrons are in a one-dimensional box, with walls at x = 0, x = a. At t = 0, the state of each particle is

\psi(x, 0) = Ax(x-a)

a) Normalize \psi and find the value of the constant A.
b) How many particles are in the interval (0, a/2) at t=0?
c)How many particles have energy E_5 at t=0?
d)What is \langle E \rangle at t=0?

Solutions
a) This is quite straightforward... just set \int_0^a \psi^2 dx = 1 and solve for A, which yields A = \sqrt{30/a^5}.
b)Just find \int_{0}^{a/2} \psi(x, 0), which is 0.5. Now, 0.5 * 1000 = 500 neutrons.
c) This is the part where I have problems... could someone help out? Exactly what eigenstates am I supposed to break \psi up into? Is it a one-dimensional particle in a box scenario? If so, should I express the function \psi in terms of

\sqrt{\frac{2}{a}} \sin \frac{n \pi x}{a}

? I already tried to express \psi in terms of the momentum eigenstates,

\phi_n = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi}} e^{ikx}

This didn't work out too well (without TI-89)... how are we supposed to find the number of particles in E_5 exactly? I know that the energy levels of the neutrons are discrete, but how are we supposed to model this without an integral? If it's an infinite summation, could someone tell me how to do this?
d) This part is pretty simple... we have to just do

\int_{0}^{a} \psi^* \hat{E}\psi dx = \int_{0}^{a} Ax(x-a) \cdot -\frac{\hbar^2}{2m} \frac{\partial^2 \psi}{\partial x^2} dx = \int_{0}^{a} Ax(x-a) \cdot 2A dx = -\frac{30}{a^5} \cdot \frac{\hbar^2}{2m} \cdot -\frac{a^3}{3} = \frac{5\hbar^2}{ma^2}

I'm just having a bit of an issue with part c... could someone help out? :smile:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I would go with trying to do a Fourier expansion of the position wave function with sine terms mostly because your box extends from 0 to a, (ie has odd symmetry). (Like you had mention doing before trying to transform the problem into momentum space.)

Although changing to momentum space should also work, although you'll have to think about it a little more carefully.

--------------------
theUndergrad

http://www.theUndergraduateJournal.com/
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Hmm... yes I think I got it. It's actually a discrete Fourier series, which turns out to be MUCH easier than the momentum way.
 
Hmm... does this work for part C:

Let

\psi = \sum_{n=1}^\infty b_n \phi_n

where \phi_n denote the eigenstates of the particle in a box scenario:

\phi_n = \sqrt{\frac{2}{a}} \sin \frac{n \pi x}{a}

Now,

\psi = \sum_{n=1}^\infty b_n \phi_n
|\psi\rangle = \sum_{n=1}^\infty b_n | \phi_n \rangle

if we change notation. From here,

\langle \phi_j|\psi\rangle = \sum_{n=1}^\infty b_n \langle \phi_j | \phi_n \rangle

\iff \langle \phi_j|\psi\rangle = \sum_{n=1}^\infty b_n \delta (j - n) = b_j \iff b_n = \langle \phi_n | \psi \rangle

Now, here's the thing... in our case, we have that the right hand side of this last equation, b_n = \langle \phi_n | \psi \rangle, must be expanded discretely, ie

\langle \phi_n | \psi \rangle = \sum_{x = 1}^\infty \phi_n^* \psi (x)

but this turns out to be very discouraging... you can't really evaluate it that well. To approximate it, can I go ahead and evaluate

\int_{1}^\infty \phi_n^* \psi (x) dx

?
 
Hmm... does this work for part C:

Let

\psi = \sum_{n=1}^\infty b_n \phi_n

where \phi_n denote the eigenstates of the particle in a box scenario:

\phi_n = \sqrt{\frac{2}{a}} \sin \frac{n \pi x}{a}

Now,

\psi = \sum_{n=1}^\infty b_n \phi_n
|\psi\rangle = \sum_{n=1}^\infty b_n | \phi_n \rangle

if we change notation. From here,

\langle \phi_j|\psi\rangle = \sum_{n=1}^\infty b_n \langle \phi_j | \phi_n \rangle

\iff \langle \phi_j|\psi\rangle = \sum_{n=1}^\infty b_n \delta (j - n) = b_j \iff b_n = \langle \phi_n | \psi \rangle

Now, here's the thing... in our case, we have that the right hand side of this last equation, b_n = \langle \phi_n | \psi \rangle, must be expanded discretely, ie

\langle \phi_n | \psi \rangle = \sum_{x = 1}^\infty \phi_n (x)^* \psi (x)

but this turns out to be very discouraging... you can't really evaluate it that well. To approximate it, can I go ahead and evaluate

\int_{1}^\infty \phi_n (x)^* \psi (x) dx

?
 
You could try this:

b_n = \int^{a}_{0} \phi_n (x)^* \psi (x,0) dx

solve for b_n , then you can find probability that particle is in E5 .
 
Last edited:
Oooh, I completely forgot that the wavefunction was 0 everywhere else heheh...
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
4K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
1K