Neutroscopic methods in General Relativity

Rade
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Smarandache is a well known crank.

By the way, the word is "neutroSOPHIC", not "neutroSCOPIC". It is, according to Smarandache's own words, a way to "interpret the uninterpretable".
 
Last edited by a moderator:
HallsofIvy said:
Smarandache is a well known crank.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Florentin_Smarandache interesting and different maybe, but on what basis do you call him a crank?

Garth
 
Last edited by a moderator:
HallsofIvy said:
Smarandache is a well known crank.
By the way, the word is "neutroSOPHIC", not "neutroSCOPIC". It is, according to Smarandache's own words, a way to "interpret the uninterpretable".
Thank you for spelling correction. Smarandache is not the lead author, the lead author and third author are physicists. I was just interested in hearing if there is any new physics in the merge of the two concepts,e.g, (neutrosophic theory) and (general relativity theory). I find that neutrosophic theory has overlap with neutral monistic philosophy of which I have an interest. Some might argue that quantum mechanics interprets the uninterpretable, no ?
 
Garth said:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Florentin_Smarandache interesting and different maybe, but on what basis do you call him a crank?
Garth

I was not particularly familair with this author, but

http://www.gallup.unm.edu/~smarandache/BeginAdventure.pdf

looks pretty cranky to me.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
pervect said:
I was not particularly familair with this author, but
http://www.gallup.unm.edu/~smarandache/BeginAdventure.pdf
looks pretty cranky to me.
Agreed!

Garth
 
Last edited by a moderator:
OK, so this has bugged me for a while about the equivalence principle and the black hole information paradox. If black holes "evaporate" via Hawking radiation, then they cannot exist forever. So, from my external perspective, watching the person fall in, they slow down, freeze, and redshift to "nothing," but never cross the event horizon. Does the equivalence principle say my perspective is valid? If it does, is it possible that that person really never crossed the event horizon? The...
In this video I can see a person walking around lines of curvature on a sphere with an arrow strapped to his waist. His task is to keep the arrow pointed in the same direction How does he do this ? Does he use a reference point like the stars? (that only move very slowly) If that is how he keeps the arrow pointing in the same direction, is that equivalent to saying that he orients the arrow wrt the 3d space that the sphere is embedded in? So ,although one refers to intrinsic curvature...
ASSUMPTIONS 1. Two identical clocks A and B in the same inertial frame are stationary relative to each other a fixed distance L apart. Time passes at the same rate for both. 2. Both clocks are able to send/receive light signals and to write/read the send/receive times into signals. 3. The speed of light is anisotropic. METHOD 1. At time t[A1] and time t[B1], clock A sends a light signal to clock B. The clock B time is unknown to A. 2. Clock B receives the signal from A at time t[B2] and...
Back
Top