Neveu-Schwarz/Ramond sectors and chirality

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter AlphaNumeric
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Chirality
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on the Neveu-Schwarz (NS) and Ramond (R) sectors in string theory, specifically the construction of states using operators such as \(\alpha_{-n}^{i}\) and \(\psi_{-\frac{1}{2}-m}^{j}\) in the NS sector, and the introduction of polarization spinors \(u^{A}\) in the R sector. The GSO projector is defined differently in each sector, with \(P_{NS}\) and \(P_{R}^{\pm}\) utilizing distinct mathematical frameworks, including gamma matrices in the R sector. The necessity of the spinor in the R sector is linked to the massless Dirac equation, which constrains the spinor components based on chirality.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of string theory concepts, particularly Neveu-Schwarz and Ramond sectors
  • Familiarity with bosonic and fermionic operators in quantum field theory
  • Knowledge of the GSO projector and its application in string theory
  • Basic comprehension of the Dirac equation and spinor representation
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the GSO projector in detail, focusing on its role in string theory
  • Explore the implications of the Dirac equation on spinor fields in quantum mechanics
  • Investigate the relationship between chirality and spinor representations in SO(8)
  • Read 'Superstring Theory' by Witten, Schwarz, and Green for deeper insights into torus invariance and state generation
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for string theorists, graduate students in theoretical physics, and researchers focusing on quantum field theory and the mathematical foundations of string theory.

AlphaNumeric
Messages
289
Reaction score
0
I'm trying to get my head around part of my course in string theory from last term, specifically the nature of Neveu-Schwarz (NS) and Ramond (R) sectors.

When constructing states in NS you start with a groundstate |0,p\rangle and use the bosonic and fermionic operators \alpha_{-n}^{i} and \psi_{-\frac{1}{2}-m}^{j} (m,n integer). These states are then truncated by the GSO projector P_{NS} = \big( 1 + (-1)^{F} \big) where F = \sum_{r=\frac{1}{2}}^{\infty}\psi_{r}^{\dagger}. \psi_{r} so that only the states satisfying P_{NS}|\phi\rangle =0 are taken to be physical (thus getting rid of the old tachyon ground state). All well and good, I can get my head around that :smile:

However, in R you don't start with the same kind of ground state, but instead something of the form |0,p,A\rangle u^{A} where u^{A} is a polarisation spinor (which can also be written in the form \left(u_{+},u_{-}\right)^{T}). Perhaps it's a very stupid question, but can someone explain why this spinor is there please?

The GSO projector is also defined in a different way, using the d=10 gamma matrices,

P_{R}^{\pm} = \big( 1 \pm \Gamma_{11}(-1)^{F} \big)

with F = \sum_{r=0}^{\infty}\psi_{r}^{\dagger}. \psi_{r} and \Gamma_{11} = \Gamma_{0}...\Gamma_{9}

I can see the plus/minus projector relating to the chirality of the spinor, but why is there a gamma matrix in R but not in NS (I would guess it's the same reason there's a spinor in R and not in NS?)

Probably related to it all is the Dirac equation \alpha_{0}. \Gamma u_{+} = 0 taking u_{+}^{A} (16 components) to u_{+}^{a} ('a' is a spinor index and u_{+}^{a} an 8_{s} rep of SO(8)) and similarly u_{-}^{A} \to u_{-}^{\dot{a}} (an 8_{c} of SO(8)), though having not taken the supersymmetry course and only passing familiarity with the dot index notation from a group symmetry course last autumn I'm also a little hazy about this bit too. Does it mean the Dirac equation puts constraints on the u spinor such that it behaves as an 8 component spinor instead of 16, with the components being different depending on the chirality of the initial spinor the Dirac equation/operator is applied on?

Having read through my notes a fair few times and looking in a textbook or two (such as 'Superstring Theory' by Witten, Schwarz and Green) it's got a bit clearer (I now get torus invariance under SL(2,Z) :smile: ) but if anyone could shed a bit more light on some of the bits I've mentioned I'd be very very grateful. If (as I suspect) I've asked a bunch of somewhat trivial questions I can get answers to in certain books or papers, just name them (and where in the book I'd find the relevant part) and I'll check my department library rather than waste anyone's time on here.

Thanks :smile:
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
We know that the Ramond ground states are massless spacetime fermions and must therefore satisfy the massless Dirac equation. The spinor u is just the solution of this equation.
 
/bangs head repeatedly on table

Doh! I knew it was probably a stupid question. I was looking so much at generation of states I didn't even put the facts it's a fermionic state and it's massless together! Thanks :smile:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
6K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K