PhysiPhile
- 24
- 0
Pythagorean said:Since you're targeting the smoke point of THC and not burning the cellulose (there's still a bud leftover after you vaporize it) you have to be careful about what you extrapolate from a cigarette study (which doesn't have THC and which does burn cellulose). I don't know any numbers.
I've never even seen a vaporizer before so I'm not expert on the smoke it contains. A internet picture is the best I can do. I would assume the density of smoke correlates with it's carcinogenicity so I need to see the smoke you're talking about.
The theory of the bong is that the water filters it, but the water doesn't actually filter everything. As bubbles pass through the water, only the contents on the edge of the bubbles get held behind, so it's actually quite a crude filter. If you have a way to percolate the bubbles and diffuse them more, then you are getting a better filter.
Right, surface area is much higher with smaller bubbles, and surface area matters most in this case. I think the only point of a gravity bong is to allow the smoke to cool.
How about rectal administration haha (from pdf above):
Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Cannabinoids said:3.1.4 Rectal Administration
With rectal application, systemic bioavailability strongly differed depending on suppository formulations. Among formulations containing several polar esters of THC in various suppository bases, THC-hemisuccinate in Witepsol H15 showed the highest bioavailability in monkeys and was calcu-lated to be 13.5%.[50] The rectal bioavailability of this formulation was calculated to be about as twice as high as oral bioavailability in a small clinical study.[25]
I don't know why they would use monkeys - I have several friends who would have volunteered after wasting their last 5 bucks on a cannoli and scratch and sniff stickers.