Newton law's - Finding acceleration

In summary, the big block of CM moves in a horizontal direction due to the tension in the string and the normal reaction between 5M and 2M.
  • #1
Saitama
4,243
93

Homework Statement


(see attachment)


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


I assumed that the acceleration of 5M is towards the right and is ##a##. Moving to the frame of 5M, the other two blocks experience a pseudo force.
The forces acting on M are the tension in the string, pseudo force, its weight and the normal reaction from 5M.
##T+Ma=Ma'##
Similarly for 2M,
##2Mg-T=2Ma'##
But I still need one more equation to reach the answer.

Any help is appreciated. Thanks!
 

Attachments

  • problem.jpg
    problem.jpg
    12.7 KB · Views: 273
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
The equation for the CM?

ehild
 
  • #3
ehild said:
The equation for the CM?

ehild

[tex]a_{cm}=\frac{Ma'+2Ma'}{8M}=\frac{3a'}{8}[/tex]
Is this correct? And how does this help me? :confused:
 
  • #4
Does the CM accelerate in horizontal direction in the inertial frame of reference?
By the way , I would use inertial frame for all parts.

ehild
 
  • #5
ehild said:
Does the CM accelerate in horizontal direction in the inertial frame of reference?

Whoops, missed that.
[tex]a_{cm,x}=\frac{-a'}{8}[/tex]
[tex]a_{cm,y}=\frac{-a'}{4}[/tex]
I have assumed that the direction to right is positive x-axis and the direction vertically upwards is positive y-axis.

By the way , I would use inertial frame for all parts.

How will you do this using the inertial frame? I assume I will have to consider the motion of the 2M block in horizontal and vertical directions.
 
  • #6
The cm accelerates in vertical direction, but is there any external horizontal force?

ehild
 
  • #7
ehild said:
The cm accelerates in vertical direction, but is there any external horizontal force?

ehild

No. Do you mean I should have ##a_{cm,x}=0##? I think my expression for ##a_{cm,x}## is incorrect.
 
  • #8
I mean the CM of the whole system in the inertial frame of reference.

ehild
 
  • #9
ehild said:
I mean the CM of the whole system.

ehild

Sorry, I still don't get it. Can you elaborate a bit more? :)
 
  • #10
If you're not comfortable thinking about the horizontal accn of CM, you can get two more equations by introducing one more unknown, the normal reaction between 5M and 2M.
 
  • #11
You need the acceleration of the big block with respect to the ground. Of course, the acceleration is zero with respect to itself, so you can not avoid using the inertial frame of reference.

ehild
 
  • #12
haruspex said:
If you're not comfortable thinking about the horizontal accn of CM, you can get two more equations by introducing one more unknown, the normal reaction between 5M and 2M.

I have to do this in the frame fixed to 5M or inertial frame?

ehild said:
You need the acceleration of the big block with respect to the ground. Of course, the acceleration is zero with respect to itself, so you can not avoid using the inertial frame of reference.

ehild

I will make equations again for the inertial frame of reference.
For M, the forces acting on it are tension, weight & normal reaction from 5M.
##T=Ma## (I feel this is not correct)

For 2M, it performs two motions, one in horizontal and the other in vertical direction.
For horizontal direction,
##N=2Ma'## (where N is the normal reaction on 2M by 5M)
For vertical direction,
##2Mg-T=2Ma##

For 5M, it perform horizontal motion, the forces acting on 5M in the horizontal direction are the tension and the normal reaction due to 2M but how would should be the value of tension? Should it be T?
 
  • #13
The tension is the same along a single rope if the pulley has zero mass.

ehild
 
  • #14
ehild said:
The tension is the same along a single rope if the pulley has zero mass.

ehild

I should have used the proper words. I meant the direction of force of tension on 5M.
 
  • #15
Actually there are three tensional forces on the big block...
 
  • #16
ehild said:
Actually there are three tensional forces on the big block...

But I need to consider only one, the other two are in vertical direction. Right?
 
  • #17
I meant three horizontal forces of tension.
 
  • #18
ehild said:
I meant three horizontal forces of tension.

I still don't see how there are three horizontal forces of tension. :confused:
 
  • #19
Two at the left pulley and one at the right one.
 
  • #20
Pranav-Arora said:
I still don't see how there are three horizontal forces of tension. :confused:

Its all Newton's THIRD Law.

At the right pulley, there is a string passing over it. That pulley, due to strands of the string exerts a force on the big block rightwards due to Newton's third law. (Why ?) Can you find that force ?

Also, at the left pulley, there are two forces acting on the big block and they are horizontal. (Find their directions as a hint.)

Also, on observing carefully the right pulley, there is one strand of the string pushing the big block downwards. (That's Newton's third law. Do not consider that as tension.)
 
  • #21
Looks like I reached close to the answer but its still not correct.

For 5M, it performs horizontal motion, hence ##T-N=5Ma'## ...(i)
I had the following equations:
##T=Ma## ...(ii)
##2Mg-T=2Ma## ...(iii)
##N=2Ma'## ...(iv)

From (i) and (iv), ##T=7Ma'##, equating this with (ii), ##a=7a'##
From (ii), ##2Mg=3Ma \Rightarrow 2g=21a' \Rightarrow a'=2g/21## but this is incorrect. :confused:
 
  • #22
The 2M mass moves both in vertical and horizontal direction, with different accelerations.

ehild
 
  • #23
ehild said:
The 2M mass moves both in vertical and horizontal direction, with different accelerations.

ehild

Yes, I even took care of that. I expressed the vertical acceleration(a') in terms of thorizontal acceleration(a).
 
  • #24
The vertical acceleration of 2M is not the same as the horizontal acceleration of M.
 
  • #25
ehild said:
The vertical acceleration of 2M is not the same as the horizontal acceleration of M.
Why not?
 
  • #26
ehild said:
The vertical acceleration of 2M is not the same as the horizontal acceleration of M.

Then how am I going to make one more equation for that? And why they aren't same?
 
  • #27
Sammy, do you ask me? I wish Pranav to find it out. ehild
 
  • #28
Pranav-Arora said:
Then how am I going to make one more equation for that? And why they aren't same?

Why should they be the same? Remember, you are in the inertial frame of reference for all masses.
 
Last edited:
  • #29
ehild said:
Why should they be the same? Remember, you are in the inertial frame of reference for all masses.

I haven't got any idea about it but is this because of the motion of 5M?
 
  • #30
Yes.
 
  • #31
ehild said:
Yes.

But how should I form the equations now? I need one more equation.
 
  • #32
ehild said:
Sammy, do you ask me? I wish Pranav to find it out.

ehild
My mistake.

Yes, I see now.
 
  • #33
Hear is a different approach.
Consider x- co-ordinates of M, 5M and 2M. When M moves through a distance x1 towards x- axis,
the whole system moves through a distance x2 away from the x-axis.
Hence the net change in the x co-ordinate of CM = M(x2 - x1) + 5Mx2 + 2Mx2 = 0.
Replace x1 and x2 by a1 and a2. You have already found a1. Find a2.
 
  • #34
Pranav-Arora said:
But how should I form the equations now? I need one more equation.

How is the acceleration of M related to the vertical acceleration of 2M and the acceleration of 5M in the inertial frame of reference? The length of the string can not change. And M moves with respect to 5M.

Start a new page, denote the horizontal acceleration components by a1,a2,a5, the vertical acceleration of 2M by a2y.
Decide a positive x and positive y direction and write up all equations for a1, a2, a5, and a2y.

ehild
 
Last edited:
  • #35
rl.bhat said:
Hear is a different approach.
Consider x- co-ordinates of M, 5M and 2M. When M moves through a distance x1 towards x- axis,
the whole system moves through a distance x2 away from the x-axis.
Hence the net change in the x co-ordinate of CM = M(x2 - x1) + 5Mx2 + 2Mx2 = 0.
Replace x1 and x2 by a1 and a2. You have already found a1. Find a2.

rbhat: I would like that Pranav figure out the relation between the accelerations. He does not need a different approach. And he haven't found a1 yet.

ehild
 

Similar threads

  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
23
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
13
Views
529
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
16
Views
536
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
13
Views
939
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
2
Replies
38
Views
1K
Replies
44
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
2
Replies
42
Views
3K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
5
Views
3K
Back
Top