Newton's 3rd Law and Acceleration

  • Thread starter Thread starter wadini
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Acceleration Law
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the acceleration of a sled and child system using Newton's 3rd Law and the formula F=ma. Two teenagers exert a force of 55 N at a 35-degree angle while a retarding force of 57 N acts against the sled's motion. Participants emphasize the importance of resolving the pulling forces into their x and y components to accurately determine the net force acting on the system. The correct approach involves calculating the x-component of the forces and using the total mass of the sled and child to find the acceleration.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Newton's 3rd Law of Motion
  • Knowledge of vector resolution and trigonometry
  • Familiarity with the formula F=ma
  • Basic concepts of forces and acceleration
NEXT STEPS
  • Learn how to resolve forces into x and y components using trigonometric functions
  • Study examples of net force calculations in physics problems
  • Explore the implications of retarding forces in motion scenarios
  • Review practical applications of Newton's Laws in real-world contexts
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, educators teaching mechanics, and anyone interested in understanding the principles of force and motion.

wadini
Messages
47
Reaction score
0
To give a 19-kg child a ride, two teenagers pull on a 3.6 kg- sled with ropes. Both teenagers pull with a force of 55 N at an angle of 35 degrees relative to the forward direction, which is the direction of motion. In addition, the snow exerts a retarding force on the sled that points opposite to the direction of motion, and has a magnitude of 57 N .

Find the acceleration of the sled and child.

What I am doing is adding the weight of the child and the sled and using that as my mass and then finding the acceleration of the two kids pulling the kid by using a=f/m and then I did that same thing for the kid... I don't know what to do from there...any suggestions? What am I forgetting?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You want to use F=ma indeed. Don't forget that the formula in reality is \sum F=ma which we usually don't write down. There is only an acceleration if there is a net force acting on an object. What is the net force on the sled+child in the x-direction?
 
What you should do is resolve the 55N forces into x and y components, then find the resultant force(F) in the x direction. Then use F=ma where m is the mass of the child+sled.
 
isn't the net force 55+57?
 
wait a minute, are you telling me to use the angles to find an x and y value?
 
No the net force is not 55N+57N. Read the problem statement precisely. It says that the retarding force opposite to the direction of motion, F is a vector after all.

Yes technically you have to calculate both the x and y components of the force. But intuitively you know that the pullers won't lift the sled vertically, so you can just calculate the x-component only. You can of course always check if mg>F_y.

Tip: If a force problem involves angles then you can be pretty certain you actually have to use those angles.
 
OKay so to find Fx I just did Fx=57sin(35) and that equals 32.69 and that is what I divided by the total mass 22.6 and came to the answer (may not be the right answer) a=1.45...is that basically it or did I just get lucky?
 
You calculated the y-component instead of the x-component. You also only calculated one force and not the net force.


net force= mass times acceleration
 
Cyosis said:
You calculated the y-component instead of the x-component. You also only calculated one force and not the net force.


net force= mass times acceleration

Cyosis is right, you want to solve for the x component of the force which is the cosine of the angles, also you have two teenagers pulling in that direct thus two such forces. Add those resulting forces to the opposite of the force created by the snow and that is your net force.

and as Cyosis said

net Force = total mass * acceleration. That should give you a much more reasonable answer.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
6K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
3K