Newton's First law of motion -- Boy jumping vertically on a moving train

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the application of Newton's First Law of Motion regarding a boy jumping vertically on a moving train. Participants debate whether the boy would land in the same spot, with one asserting that the train's lack of acceleration supports this conclusion. Observations about liquids poured in a moving aircraft falling straight down reinforce the idea that objects behave according to Newton's laws in inertial frames. The consensus leans toward the understanding that the boy's vertical jump does not alter his horizontal motion relative to the train. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the principles of inertia and motion in a non-accelerating frame.
Mikasun1108
Messages
10
Reaction score
8
Homework Statement
A boy was inside a train moving at a constant speed when he jumped. When he landed on the floor of the train after the jump, he did not land on the same spot as the train was moving forward.
a. True
b. False
Relevant Equations
Newton's first law of motion
I'm not sure if my answer is correct but I think the answer is false.
Thank you for your help :)
-sun1108
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Show some effort : why do you think the statement is "false" ?
 
hmmm27 said:
Show some effort : why do you think the statement is "false" ?

I personally think that it is because the train wasn't accelerating therefore it will land at the same spot. And also sort of because of my own experience (not entirely sure) when flight attendence pour some water/juice etc the liquid comes straight down and not on a different angle. Therefore my logic brought me to this conclusion. Sorry fo just adding this now, i wasn't entirely sure.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
"When flight attendence pour some water/juice etc the liquid comes straight down and not on a different angle."

That's a good observation. The aircraft is moving almost inertially (i.e. with negligible acceleration), so things inside the aircraft behave according to Newton's laws. And, objects dropped fall straight down.
 
  • Like
Likes Mikasun1108
PeroK said:
"When flight attendence pour some water/juice etc the liquid comes straight down and not on a different angle."

That's a good observation. The aircraft is moving almost inertially (i.e. with negligible acceleration), so things inside the aircraft behave according to Newton's laws. And, objects dropped fall straight down.
Thank you for the extra information, really appreciate it :)
 
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Thread 'Minimum mass of a block'
Here we know that if block B is going to move up or just be at the verge of moving up ##Mg \sin \theta ## will act downwards and maximum static friction will act downwards ## \mu Mg \cos \theta ## Now what im confused by is how will we know " how quickly" block B reaches its maximum static friction value without any numbers, the suggested solution says that when block A is at its maximum extension, then block B will start to move up but with a certain set of values couldn't block A reach...
Back
Top