Newton's laws and submerged objects.

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around using a remote-controlled submersible to explore Newton's Laws of motion in a physics educational context. Participants examine the complexities of conducting experiments with submerged objects, including the effects of thrust, drag, and the challenges of measuring forces accurately in fluid environments.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Homework-related

Main Points Raised

  • One participant plans to use spring scales to measure mass and thrust, but expresses concerns about the accuracy of using Δx = ½ a (Δt)^2 due to non-constant acceleration and the inability to calculate drag for net force in F=ma.
  • Another participant notes that thrust depends on the sub's velocity relative to water and the propulsion system used, complicating the experiment.
  • It is suggested that the effective mass of the system is not simply its physical mass due to the need for water displacement, which complicates the application of F=ma.
  • Some participants argue for simpler experimental setups that avoid the uncertainties of submerged experiments, suggesting land-based alternatives.
  • One participant proposes using wheeled carts with sails to investigate net force and acceleration, indicating a focus on maritime applications.
  • Concerns are raised that students might misinterpret the applicability of F=ma to real-life scenarios if the complexities of the submersible experiment are not adequately addressed.
  • A later reply discusses the historical development of boundary layer theory and the challenges of studying fluid dynamics without advanced calculus, suggesting the use of computational fluid dynamics (CFD) software for practical applications.
  • Another participant recommends using a dynamometer and towing models in a test tank to investigate fluid drag and propulsion resistance.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a mix of agreement and disagreement regarding the appropriateness of using a submersible for teaching Newton's Laws. While some support the idea of maritime applications, others advocate for simpler experiments to avoid overwhelming students with complexities.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight limitations in measuring forces accurately in fluid dynamics, the dependence on specific experimental setups, and the challenges posed by varying conditions such as water flow and object shape. There is also mention of the need for advanced mathematical tools to analyze fluid behavior effectively.

Gersty
Messages
47
Reaction score
1
I have access to a remote controlled submersible and I want to use it to do some physics with some students of mine. We are examining Newton's Laws. I intend to use spring scales to determine the mass of the sub and the max force the sub can exert by applying full forward thrust while reading a spring scale attached to the sub. We'll then have the sub push floating containers of various weights across a tank to record the times.
We'll use Δx = ½ a (Δt)^2 and F=ma to calculate the acceleration for each trial and then compare the results.
My issue is that this is good as far as it goes, but...
1. Δx = ½ a (Δt)^2 will yield bad data because acceleration won't be constant.
2. F=ma will yield bad data because we can't calculate the force of friction (drag) to determine the net force.

I think it will be worth doing to get practice collecting data and making calculations as long as we discuss the previous two points, but I'm looking for some help in making the calculations a little more realistic. Any ideas?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This is more complicated than you apparently think. For example

The thrust of the sub will depend on its velocity relative to the water, and the relationship between thrust and speed will depend on what type of propulsion system it has (e.g. propellor or water jet).

The effective mass of the system is not equal to its physical mass, because the objects can't move unless some water moves in the opposite direction. This is hard to quantify because it depends not only on the shape of the objects, but also on the width and depth of the water channel. It's an important reason why fluid flow experimenters prefer to have steady flow conditions, not accelerating ones.

If this is part of an "intro to physics" or "intro to mechanics" course, maybe you would be better with a simpler situation, despite the "cool factor" of the submarine, unless you are sure your students can handle so many deviations from the basic notion of "F = ma" without getting lost, and they have the enough math skills to quantify them (which probably means calculus).
 
IDK why you want to use a submersible to experiment with and demonstrate Newton's Laws of motion, unless you just want to play with boats in a bathub. There are simpler experimental setups (land-based, unfortunately) which can be used that don't include all of the uncertainties you mentioned in the OP. Save the boats for when your students have grasped the basics.
 
I agree. I'm trying to do physics with a focus on maritime applications. Thus the difficulty. Another idea would be to use wheeled carts with sails and a fan to investigate how sails work and focus on some net force and acceleration calculations.
 
Gersty said:
I'm trying to do physics with a focus on maritime applications.

Fair enough, but I think the danger is that the students (especially the less smart ones) take away the message that "F = ma" doesn't actually apply to real life, it's just something you have to learn to pass the course.
 
Again, I agree. I think I'll most likely leave the submersible till we hit buoyancy and displacement, and instead focus on carts on an air-track fitted out with sails to investigate net force and aerodynamics, etc... Just as a follow-up though, how does one go about examining friction and other forces on a submerged object in real life anyway? Is there any applicable way to do it with a limited calculus background?
 
Well, 100 years ago literally nobody had figured out how to do it for general real-world flow situations, until Prandtl invented boundary layer theory. Until the 1980s the required amount of computing power was too expensive for general use - but a cheap PC today is much more powerful that the Cray supercomputers of the 1980s.

You won't be able to do much "pen and paper" work with only "calculus lite".

I would say the practical way today is get a CFD software package and learn how to use it. I'm not a fluids specialist and what experience I have is with gases not liquids, so I don't know what is most appropriate for your applications.

It might be worth searching for some higher level courses (e.g.
http://www.southampton.ac.uk/engine...ce_maritime_computational_fluid_dynamics.page) and contacting their academic staff for advice.
 
It's not clear what equipment you have access to, but if you want to investigate friction due to fluid drag, a dynamometer would be a useful tool to have. Towing models in a test tank is still a useful procedure when investigating resistance and propulsion problems for marine vehicles.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
4K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K