Newton's laws: Block/Pulley/Wedge/Friction

  • Thread starter Thread starter Eitan Levy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Laws Newton's laws
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving a block, pulley, wedge, and friction. The original poster seeks to determine the minimal static friction required to prevent motion of a mass M under specific conditions, including the effects of gravity and tension on two masses m1 and m2, with varying coefficients of friction.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the forces acting on the system, including gravity, normal forces, and tension. There are attempts to derive equations related to the forces and friction, with some participants questioning the assumptions made regarding the direction of friction and the conditions under which the masses will move.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants providing insights into the assumptions made in the problem setup. There is recognition of the ambiguity regarding the direction of friction and the conditions under which the masses will move, leading to further exploration of the equations presented. Some participants suggest revisiting the equations based on the assumptions about the masses.

Contextual Notes

There is mention of a potential oversight in the problem statement regarding the relationship between m1 and m2 sin(θ), which affects the interpretation of the forces involved. Participants are also considering the implications of the coefficients of static and dynamic friction in their calculations.

Eitan Levy
Messages
259
Reaction score
11

Homework Statement


upload_2017-12-18_0-15-41.png

No friction between m2 and M.
The static friction between M and the floor is μs and the dynamic is μd.
When F=0, what is the minimal static friction if M doesn't move?

Homework Equations


F=ma
Force caused by friction: μN=F

The Attempt at a Solution


What I thought is that m2 is affected by gravity, normal and tension and that M is affected by m2's normal, gravity, it's own normal and the friction.
I wrote the following equations:
N=m2gcosθ
Ncosθ+Mg=N' (N' is M's normal).
Nsinθ=μsN'
My answer:
μs=m2gsinθcosθ/(Mg+m2gcos2θ)
Their answer:
upload_2017-12-18_0-30-33.png

What am I missing here?
 

Attachments

  • upload_2017-12-18_0-15-41.png
    upload_2017-12-18_0-15-41.png
    2.9 KB · Views: 1,792
  • upload_2017-12-18_0-30-33.png
    upload_2017-12-18_0-30-33.png
    3.2 KB · Views: 812
Physics news on Phys.org
Eitan Levy said:
What am I missing here?
The forces exerted on the pulley (and thus on M) by the rope.
 
haruspex said:
The forces exerted on the pulley (and thus on M) by the rope.
Thanks!
 
haruspex said:
The forces exerted on the pulley (and thus on M) by the rope.
I still don't get the correct answer, is my algebra the problem or my equations:
m1a=m1g-T
m2a=T-m2gsinθ
N=m2gcosθ
N'=Ncosθ+Mg+(1+sinθ)T
Tcosθ=μsN'+Nsinθ
 
Eitan Levy said:
I still don't get the correct answer, is my algebra the problem or my equations:
m1a=m1g-T
m2a=T-m2gsinθ
N=m2gcosθ
N'=Ncosθ+Mg+(1+sinθ)T
Tcosθ=μsN'+Nsinθ
Is it obvious which way friction will act?
 
haruspex said:
Is it obvious which way friction will act?
No, but I have no idea how to check it.
 
Eitan Levy said:
No, but I have no idea how to check it.
The official answer seems to have made an assumption. There is a factor in the numerator that could in principle be negative, so they must be assuming it is positive. Or is there some information you have left out?
Your equations in post #4 make the opposite assumption.
 
haruspex said:
The official answer seems to have made an assumption. There is a factor in the numerator that could in principle be negative, so they must be assuming it is positive. Or is there some information you have left out?
Your equations in post #4 make the opposite assumption.
The exact words:
"A force equals to F applies on a surface with a mass of M. The dynamic and static friction coefficients of M with the floor are μD and μS respectively. A body with a mass of m1 is connected with a pulley to another body with a mass of m2, which slides without friction on M.
First they asked what is the acceleration of m2 assuming μs is very big, but this was not mentioned in this part of the question so I thought I am not allowed to use this. Does this resolve it?
 
Eitan Levy said:
Does this resolve it?
Not really. The trouble is that we cannot tell which way the masses will move.
If m1 > m2 sin(θ) then m1 descends and m2 slides left. That will tend to push M right, so friction acts to the left. This seems to be the problem setter's intent. But in your equations you have taken friction as acting to the right, which would be correct if m1 < m2 sin(θ).
I cannot tell if you had any algebraic errors beyond that.

Another clue to the intent is the force F that comes in later.
 
  • #10
haruspex said:
Not really. The trouble is that we cannot tell which way the masses will move.
If m1 > m2 sin(θ) then m1 descends and m2 slides left. That will tend to push M right, so friction acts to the left. This seems to be the problem setter's intent. But in your equations you have taken friction as acting to the right, which would be correct if m1 < m2 sin(θ).
I cannot tell if you had any algebraic errors beyond that.

Another clue to the intent is the force F that comes in later.

That was my problem as well.
So basically, it's impossible to determine this?
 
  • #11
Eitan Levy said:
That was my problem as well.
So basically, it's impossible to determine this?
I am saying that the problem setter forgot to specify that m1 > m2 sin(θ). So assume that and try again. You will need to change your last equation in post #4.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Eitan Levy
  • #12
haruspex said:
I am saying that the problem setter forgot to specify that m1 > m2 sin(θ). So assume that and try again. You will need to change your last equation in post #4.
Alright, thank you.
 
  • #13
The given answer should not have a factor of g in the numerator.

By taking the absolute value of the numerator, the answer will be valid for all values of ##m_1## and ##m_2##.
 

Similar threads

Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
784
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
6K