Newtons Laws with mouse and elephant

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the application of Newton's laws of motion, specifically focusing on the behavior of a mouse and an elephant subjected to the same force on a frictionless surface. Participants explore the concepts of acceleration, inertia, and the effects of mass on motion.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the differences in acceleration between the mouse and the elephant, questioning the role of inertia and friction in their ability to move. There is an exploration of how mass affects acceleration when the same force is applied.

Discussion Status

The conversation has evolved to clarify misunderstandings about inertia and the effects of friction. Some participants have provided explanations that seem to resonate, while others continue to express confusion about the illustrative examples used in textbooks.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating the implications of inertia in practical scenarios, questioning the adequacy of traditional examples in conveying the concept effectively. There is an underlying assumption that friction is a significant factor in real-world applications, which is being examined in the context of a frictionless environment.

pkc111
Messages
224
Reaction score
26

Homework Statement



A mouse and an elephant are on a perfectly flat ice rink (no friction). 10N of force is applied to each animal for 10 seconds, describe their behaviour.

Homework Equations



F=ma

The Attempt at a Solution



Both animals will accelerate immediately and continue accelerating for 10 seconds with the mouse accelerating at a faster rate than the elephant. After 10 seconds both animals will continue to move with constant velocity
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Correct
 
Thanks, but I still don't get it.
I was told that not being able to move a bus with your hands, but able to push a bike with your hands was because of a difference in inertia of the 2 objects.
Isnt this only because they have different frictional forces and nothing to do with any difference in inertia ?
 
The heavier object has a larger mass, thus a larger inertia. In other words, the bus can resist to any changes of motion better than the bike. The reason why the frictional force on the bus is larger than on the bike, is that the bus has a larger mass.

F.friction=my*N (Where N=mg on a flat surface)

As I see it, it's like attacking the same problem from different angles. Your explanation is fine in my opinion.
 
Just to clarify

Am I right in saying that a bus can be moved immediately (with small but increasing velocity) with the lightest touch if there was no friction, despite its huge inertia ??
 
Yes. The bus will start moving. Let's take an example. We have your 25 000 kg bus, and a 10 kg bike in space.

Now we exert a force of 2 N on both bodies. If we assume that we can neglect all opposing forces, (i.e. there is no friction, and gravitational forces are minimal) we can easilly calculate the acceleration the bus will get, and the acceleration the bike will get from

F=ma --> a=F/m

We see that the bus will get a smaller acceleration because it has a larger mass. In other words, when we stop applying our 2 N force on the bodies, the bike will have a larger velocity. That's what inertia is about. The heavier bus will not change it's state of motion as much as the bike. It's about comparison. Light object will get larger velocities than heavier objects when an equal force is applied on both bodies.

So back to your question, the bus will start moving with the lightest touch, but the bike will start moving a lot faster when the same touch is applied on it.

Neglecting gravity and other opposing forces
 
Thanks that makes sense.

I still don't think textbooks stating that a bus is not possible to be pushed by hand is a great way to illustrate inertia, they should just say it would accelerate less (if there was no friction).
 

Similar threads

Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K