Newtons third law regarding spacecraft engines

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the application of Newton's third law in the context of spacecraft engines and thrust generation in space. Participants explore whether thrust in space necessitates carrying fuel and consider alternative methods of propulsion, including the concept of using vibrations. The conversation also touches on the feasibility of mass displacement for motion in a zero-gravity environment.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that Newton's third law is universally applicable, not exclusive to spacecraft thrust, but agree that thrust requires ejection of mass.
  • One participant suggests that vibrations emitted in space would not generate thrust due to insufficient particles to push against.
  • Another participant mentions that while sound cannot propagate in space, gathering reaction mass could be a viable method for propulsion.
  • A participant raises the idea of using sudden mass displacement for directed motion, questioning if this concept applies in space without gravity.
  • Concerns are expressed regarding the effectiveness of mass displacement in achieving propulsion, emphasizing the role of gravity in the behavior of objects on ramps.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree that Newton's third law applies to thrust generation, but there is no consensus on the effectiveness of alternative propulsion methods or the role of mass displacement in a zero-gravity environment. Multiple competing views remain on these topics.

Contextual Notes

Participants express uncertainty regarding the practicality of using vibrations for propulsion and the implications of mass displacement in space, highlighting the need for further exploration of these concepts.

Irondove
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hello PF members,

I was wondering whether Newtons third law was exclusive to spacecraft thrust; space being empty and without enough particles for a force to push against. That in order to produce thrust in space, you would need to carry the fuel that you plan to eject with you (disregarding the solar sail; good luck if it gets punctured during a microscopic meteor shower). Is this notion correct or are there other methods of space flight.

I had an idea some time ago, that instead of ejecting fuel out of an engine, you built a device which emitted vibrations in a certain direction much like a stereo speaker. would something like this work in space, or are there not enough particles in space to generate a vibration?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to Physics Forums.

Irondove said:
I was wondering whether Newtons third law was exclusive to spacecraft thrust; space being empty and without enough particles for a force to push against. That in order to produce thrust in space, you would need to carry the fuel that you plan to eject with you (disregarding the solar sail; good luck if it gets punctured during a microscopic meteor shower). Is this notion correct or are there other methods of space flight.

I would not say "exclusive to spacecraft thrust" as the law has universal application. You are correct, though, that to accelerate a body in one direction another body must accelerate in the opposite direction.

I had an idea some time ago, that instead of ejecting fuel out of an engine, you built a device which emitted vibrations in a certain direction much like a stereo speaker. would something like this work in space, or are there not enough particles in space to generate a vibration?

If this "engine" were to push on any particles at all, then the engine will be pushed in the opposite direction. The acceleration, though, will be inversely proportional to the mass of the engine (and the ship attached to it). It could be miniscule.

I think you really mean to ask "Is there enough mass to push off and get a significant acceleration?" I suspect the answer is no.

This might help clarify: the Deep Space One probe had an ion drive that ejected about 7 x 1018 xenon ions per second to get a thrust equal to the weight of a sheet of paper.
 
Irondove said:
Hello PF members,

I was wondering whether Newtons third law was exclusive to spacecraft thrust; space being empty and without enough particles for a force to push against. That in order to produce thrust in space, you would need to carry the fuel that you plan to eject with you (disregarding the solar sail; good luck if it gets punctured during a microscopic meteor shower). Is this notion correct or are there other methods of space flight.

I had an idea some time ago, that instead of ejecting fuel out of an engine, you built a device which emitted vibrations in a certain direction much like a stereo speaker. would something like this work in space, or are there not enough particles in space to generate a vibration?

You guessed right. There's not enough gas in space for sound energy to propagate from a vibrating system. But with sufficiently large scoops one can gather up useful reaction mass to propel a ship. The trick is doing so without creating too much drag.
 
I suppose as a side note, a future space insustry would be fuel harvesting.

Another thought occurred to me. Can the sudden mass displacement be used as a directed motion. Eg: wheel with a central axis on a ramp. If you place mass at the center of the axis, the wheel will roll uniformly down the ramp. If on the other hand you place the weight on the circumference of the wheel, it bounces down the ramp. Will this work in space or do you need the presence of gravity?
 
Irondove said:
I suppose as a side note, a future space insustry would be fuel harvesting.

Another thought occurred to me. Can the sudden mass displacement be used as a directed motion. Eg: wheel with a central axis on a ramp. If you place mass at the center of the axis, the wheel will roll uniformly down the ramp. If on the other hand you place the weight on the circumference of the wheel, it bounces down the ramp. Will this work in space or do you need the presence of gravity?

I am not sure how you see the "bounces" as applying to spaceship propulsion, but you are right that gravity i(as well as the force the incline applies upwards on the wheel) is responsible for the behavior. Also note that the potential energy you put into the wheel and weight while lifting them to their starting points on the ramp is the actual source of the kinetic energy of the wheel's motion.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
6K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
5K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K