Newton's Third Law textbook -- question about the sign of a force

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion clarifies the interpretation of Newton's Third Law, specifically the relationship between forces acting on two objects, A and B. It establishes that while the magnitudes of the forces are equal (##F_{AB} = F_{BA}##), the direction is opposite, represented as ##\mathbf{F}_{AB} = -\mathbf{F}_{BA}## when considering vector notation. The conversation highlights the importance of distinguishing between vector and scalar representations in textbooks, where vectors are often denoted with boldface or arrows, while scalars are in italics. It emphasizes that the sign of a force can be determined based on the context of the problem and the conventions used in free body diagrams.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Newton's Third Law of Motion
  • Familiarity with vector and scalar quantities in physics
  • Knowledge of free body diagrams and their conventions
  • Basic mathematical skills for force calculations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study vector notation in physics, focusing on boldface and arrow representations
  • Learn how to construct and interpret free body diagrams
  • Explore examples of force calculations involving direction and magnitude
  • Review common misconceptions about Newton's Third Law in introductory physics textbooks
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, educators teaching mechanics, and anyone seeking to deepen their understanding of force interactions and vector analysis in classical mechanics.

Mr Davis 97
Messages
1,461
Reaction score
44
Imagine that I am pushing on a wall. Then my textbook says that by Newton's third law, ##F_{AB} = F_{BA}##, where I am B and the wall is A. Isn't this wrong? Shouldn't it be that ##F_{AB} = -F_{BA}##?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Mr Davis 97 said:
Shouldn't it be that ##F_{AB} = -F_{BA}##?
Sure, if they are using ##F## to represent the forces as vectors. Perhaps they were just talking about the magnitudes of the forces, which are equal.
 
Doc Al said:
Sure, if they are using ##F## to represent the forces as vectors. Perhaps they were just talking about the magnitudes of the forces, which are equal.
Ah, I see. I guess it can get kind of ambiguous.
 
Most introductory textbooks use boldface or arrows on top to denote vectors: $$\mathbf{F}_{AB} = -\mathbf{F}_{BA}\\{\vec F}_{AB} = - {\vec F}_{BA}$$ versus unadorned italics for magnitudes (scalars): $$F_{AB} = F_{BA}$$
 
Newton's Third Law: For every force acting, there is an equal and opposite force acting. Equal in magnitude, opposite in direction.
Since the "opposite in direction" is often taken as a given, other descriptions generally concentrate on the magnitude, and so FAB = FBA.
 
Mr Davis 97 said:
Ah, I see. I guess it can get kind of ambiguous.
If there is a diagram showing the opposite arrows, they are often meant to indicate the convention for positive direction of each force individually. So the later math doesn't use vectors in one coordinate system, but factors for the indicated unit vectors. A negative result then indicates that the force is opposite to its arrow in the diagram.
 
The thing is, for a given object (free body diagram) that force only applies once. If you stick with the data you've been given in any question or practical situation, the sign of any force is either given or is calculable. You can give an 'unknown' an arbitrary sign and the calculation will produce the correct sign eventually.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
893
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
5K
  • · Replies 41 ·
2
Replies
41
Views
2K