Why Doesn't Electron Shielding Block RF Radiation?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion clarifies the concept of electron shielding in relation to RF radiation and proton behavior in magnetic fields. It establishes that while electrons can shield protons from magnetic fields, this shielding does not equate to absorption of RF radiation. The energy required to flip a proton's magnetic moment is influenced by the local magnetic environment created by nearby electrons, but this does not prevent RF radiation from affecting the protons. The distinction between shielding and energy absorption is crucial for understanding NMR principles.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR)
  • Basic knowledge of quantum mechanics (QM)
  • Familiarity with electromagnetic radiation types, specifically RF and IR
  • Knowledge of magnetic fields and their effects on atomic particles
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the principles of Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) in depth
  • Study the differences between RF and IR radiation absorption mechanisms
  • Learn about the effects of magnetic fields on protons and electrons
  • Explore quantum mechanics concepts related to electron behavior in magnetic fields
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in chemistry, physics, and materials science, particularly those interested in NMR applications and the interaction of electromagnetic radiation with matter.

CuriousBanker
Messages
190
Reaction score
24
TL;DR
I understand why shielding lowers the effect of a magnetic field, but why doesn't it lower the effect of RF radiation?
I am watching this video;

at the 8:20 mark it shows that a proton in a magnetic field will align with the magnetic field very easily if there is no shielding from electrons, and therefore will require energy to shift to the opposite spin state; makes sense to me. I also understand that when there is more shielding, the proton will be less effected by the magnetic field and therefore will require less energy to move it to the opposite spin state. What I don't understand, is why don't the electrons shield the proton from the RF radiation? Electrons are effected by radiation (hence IR spectroscopy), so I'm curious as to why the RF radiation is not also shielded by the electrons. With no shielding it takes more energy to spin, but there is less shielding to block the radiation. With shielding it requires less energy to spin, but there is more shielding to block the radiation, so why isn't the same amount of radiation required to bring both nuclei into resonance? I'm guessing the answer is that RF radiation is not absorbed by electrons, whereas IR is? I don't know anything about the different types of radiation, or QM, so that's probably where my ignorance lies.

Thank you in advance
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
I only have a elementary knowledge of NMR but I think you are misinterpreting the use of the terms shielding/deshielding. I know when we talk about shielding we naturally think of the absorption of radiation or energy. But here the term is used only for the affect of nearby electrons on a proton's local magnetic environment. This "shielding" effect of the electrons reduces the local magnetic field near the proton under question. That is the shielding electrons counteract the applied magnetic field so that the energy needed to "flip" the magnetic moment is less than if the the proton is "out in the open" deshielded so to speak experiencing the full affect of the applied magnetic field. This shielding does not absorb energy. The use of the term shielding is irrelevant to the penetration of the applied RF energy to the proton.
 
Short answer to the point and easy to understand. Thanks!
 
  • Like
Likes berkeman
I came.across a headline and read some of the article, so I was curious. Scientists discover that gold is a 'reactive metal' by accidentally creating a new material in the lab https://www.earth.com/news/discovery-that-gold-is-reactive-metal-by-creating-gold-hydride-in-lab-experiment/ From SLAC - A SLAC team unexpectedly formed gold hydride in an experiment that could pave the way for studying materials under extreme conditions like those found inside certain planets and stars undergoing...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
849
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K