No distinction between positive and negative for imag nums?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the nature of square roots of complex numbers, specifically addressing the claim that there is no distinction between positive and negative for nonreal numbers. Participants explore the implications of this assertion in the context of finding square roots of complex numbers and the uniqueness of solutions.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions the assertion that both ##3 - 2i## and ##- (3 - 2i)## are valid square roots of ##5 - 12i##, seeking clarification on why this is the case.
  • Another participant argues against the claim, stating that there is a clear distinction between a complex number and its negative, using the example of real numbers to illustrate that the square root symbol typically denotes the positive root.
  • Some participants note that while the square root symbol conventionally refers to the positive root in real numbers, the negative counterpart also satisfies the equation when squared.
  • One participant emphasizes that in the complex domain, new rules apply, suggesting that both solutions arise from the representation of complex numbers in polar form and the periodic nature of the exponential function.
  • Another participant elaborates on the non-uniqueness of n-th roots of complex numbers, explaining how multiple roots can be derived from the same complex number.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express disagreement regarding the assertion that there is no distinction between positive and negative for nonreal numbers. Multiple competing views are presented, with some supporting the idea of equivalence in complex roots while others maintain that a distinction exists.

Contextual Notes

Participants reference the conventions of square roots in real numbers versus complex numbers, highlighting the potential for confusion in interpretation. The discussion also touches on the mathematical properties of complex numbers and their roots, which may depend on specific definitions and contexts.

Mr Davis 97
Messages
1,461
Reaction score
44
I am solving for the square root of a complex number, namely: ##\sqrt{5 -12i}## Let's assume for brevity's sake that I already have the solution ##3- 2i##. This is fine and well, but the book that I am reading goes on to say that "##- (3 -2i)## is an equally valid solution, since there is no distinction between 'positive' and 'negative' for nonreal numbers." How is this so? Why do both of these solution work for the root of a complex number, while if I were calculating ##\sqrt{5 - 12 \sqrt{2}}## there would only be one solution, namely the positive one?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This is clearly untrue. Just consider the example ##w = a + 0i## and ##z = -(a + 0i)##. Clearly there is a distinction.

Now, for example, in the case of the reals, there is a difference between finding the square root of a number and solving for the roots of a polynomial. If I wrote "what is ##\sqrt{4}##?" then the answer would be ##2##, but if I asked for the roots of ##x^2 - 4 = 0 \Rightarrow x^2 = 4##, then there are clearly two solutions, ##-2## and ##2##.

But this is just common practice. When people write the square root symbol with no context, they mean the positive solution; however, clearly the negative solution squared will yield the term in the square root as well.
 
axmls said:
But this is just common practice. When people write the square root symbol with no context, they mean the positive solution; however, clearly the negative solution squared will yield the term in the square root as well.
But neither i nor -i are positive. There is no algebraic test that can distinguish between ##i=\sqrt{-1}## and ##j=-\sqrt{-1}##
 
axmls said:
This is clearly untrue. Just consider the example ##w = a + 0i## and ##z = -(a + 0i)##. Clearly there is a distinction.

The quote says "nonreal numbers". You need to give examples from ##\mathbb{C}\setminus\mathbb{R}##.
 
Mr Davis 97 said:
I am solving for the square root of a complex number, namely: ##\sqrt{5 -12i}## Let's assume for brevity's sake that I already have the solution ##3- 2i##. This is fine and well, but the book that I am reading goes on to say that "##- (3 -2i)## is an equally valid solution, since there is no distinction between 'positive' and 'negative' for nonreal numbers." How is this so? Why do both of these solution work for the root of a complex number, while if I were calculating ##\sqrt{5 - 12 \sqrt{2}}## there would only be one solution, namely the positive one?
When you are in the complex domain there are new rules and new ways to look at things. Example: When you say ##5 -12i## I immediately convert it to ##r\cdot e^{i\phi} ## with r being 13 and φ being -1.17601. From there you can take the square root easily - (square root of r and φ/2). But in doing so, you forget that ##e^{i\phi}## and ##e^{i(\phi+2\pi)} ## represent the same number! So, taking the square root you must include both the solution with φ/2 and the solution with φ/2+π. And, since ##e^{i\pi}=-1 ##, you see why the other solution is included...
 
The n-th root of an imaginary number Z is not unique. It means all the numbers z1, z2 z3 ... the n-th power of which is Z: (zk)n=Z.

You can find the second root of 5-12i as a+ib so as (a+ib)2=5-12i. This means real equations for both the real part and imaginary part:
a2-b2=5, 2ab=-12. Eliminating b and solving the quadratic equation for a2, only one solution is positive, a2=9, so the solutions are a = 3 and b = -2; and a = -3, b = 2.

As for the complex n-th root, the n-the roots of the unit 1 are cos((2π/n)k)+isin((2π/n)k) for k=0, 1, n-1, or, in Euler's notation e((2π/n)ki). So the second roots of 1 are cos(0)+i sin(0) = 1 and cos(π) +i sin(π) = -1.
The n-th roots of a general complex number ##Z=|Z|e^{iΦ}## are ##\sqrt[n] {|Z|}e^{i(Φ/n + (2π/n) k }## for k=0, 1, 2...n-1 where |Z|1/n is the real n-th root of |Z|.
Written in trigonometric form, ##Z^{1/n}=\sqrt[n] {|Z|}(\cos(Φ/n + (2π/n) k)+i\sin(Φ/n + (2π/n) k)##.
This way the second roots of Z=5-12i are = √13 (cos(Φ/2+πk)+i sin( Φ/2+πk) ), where Φ=arctan(-12/5) cos(Φ)=5/13, sin(Φ)=-12/13, and k = 0, 1.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: mfb

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
6K
  • · Replies 45 ·
2
Replies
45
Views
6K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
24
Views
5K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
7K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K