MHB No. of real solution of exponential equation

  • Thread starter Thread starter juantheron
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Exponential
AI Thread Summary
The equation 1 + 8^x + 27^x = 2^x + 12^x + 9^x is analyzed for the number of real solutions. It is established that for x > 0, f(x) is greater than g(x), while at x = 0, both functions equal 3. As x approaches negative infinity, f(x) approaches 1 and g(x) approaches 0. Both functions are increasing across the entire real line. Therefore, the analysis suggests there is only one real solution to the equation.
juantheron
Messages
243
Reaction score
1
No. of real solution of the equation $1+8^x+27^x = 2^x+12^x+9^x.$
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
jacks said:
No. of real solution of the equation $1+8^x+27^x = 2^x+12^x+9^x.$
$1+8^x+27^x =1+8^x+ (2+12+9+4)^x----(1)$
$=1+8^x+(2^x+12^x+9^x)+4^x+-----$
$=2^x+12^x+9^x----(2)$
if $x\neq 0$ then (1) > (2)
$\therefore x=0$ is the only solution
 
Albert said:
$1+8^x+27^x =1+8^x+ (2+12+9+4)^x----(1)$
$=1+8^x+(2^x+12^x+9^x)+4^x+-----$
$=2^x+12^x+9^x----(2)$
if $x\neq 0$ then (1) > (2)
$\therefore x=0$ is the only solution

You have employed a mistake known as "The Freshman's Dream"...:D
 
MarkFL said:
You have employed a mistake known as "The Freshman's Dream"...:D
I did not say:$27^x=(2+9+12+4)^x=2^x+9^x+12^x+4^x$
I said :$27^x=2^x+9^x+12^x+4^x+----$
the remaining terms are omitted
 
Albert said:
I did not say:$27^x=(2+9+12+4)^x=2^x+9^x+12^x+4^x$
I said :$27^x=2^x+9^x+12^x+4^x+----$
the remaining terms are omitted

wrong

to give an example $3^{.5} = 1.7 < 2^{.5} + 1^{.5 }$ and not > (given approximately)
 
kaliprasad said:
wrong

to give an example $3^{.5} = 1.7 < 2^{.5} + 1^{.5 }$ and not > (given approximately)
let $f(x)=1+8^x+27^x-----(1)$
$g(x)=2^x+9^x+12^x----_(2)$
if $x>0$ then (1)>(2)
if $x=0$ then (1)=(2)=3
if $x<0$ and $ x \rightarrow -\infty$
then $f(x)\rightarrow 1$,and $g(x)\rightarrow 0$
here $f(x)$ and $g(x)$ both are increasing on $(-\infty , \infty)$
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Back
Top