No problem, happy to help! Good luck with your project.

  • Thread starter Thread starter sunmoonlight
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on determining the value of the cooling constant k in the equation T(t) = TA + (To - TA)e^(-kt) given specific temperature values: T(t) = 51 degrees, TA = 19 degrees, To = 80 degrees, and t = 1200 s. It is established that k must be positive for an object to cool down over time, as indicated by the relationship between temperature and time. The confusion arises from plotting ln(T(t) - TA) against time, which yields a negative slope, leading to misconceptions about the sign of k. The correct approach involves rearranging the equation to clarify the relationship between k and the logarithmic transformation of the cooling law.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Newton's Law of Cooling
  • Familiarity with exponential decay functions
  • Knowledge of logarithmic functions and their properties
  • Ability to manipulate algebraic equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Learn how to derive k from the logarithmic form of the cooling law
  • Study the implications of temperature gradients in cooling processes
  • Explore the concept of time constants in exponential decay
  • Investigate the effects of ambient temperature on cooling rates
USEFUL FOR

Students in physics or engineering, educators teaching thermodynamics, and anyone interested in understanding heat transfer and cooling processes.

sunmoonlight
Messages
8
Reaction score
1
Homework Statement
Find the value of k
Relevant Equations
T(t) = TA + (To - TA) e ^-kt
What's the value of k, given T(t) = 51 degrees, TA = 19 degrees, To = 80 degrees and t = 1200 s?
Should the value of k be positive or negative if an object is cooling down?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
sunmoonlight said:
Homework Statement: Find the value of k
Relevant Equations: T(t) = TA + (To - TA) e ^-kt

What's the value of k, given T(t) = 51 degrees, TA = 19 degrees, To = 80 degrees and t = 1200 s?
Should the value of k be positive or negative if an object is cooling down?
What must the sign of ##k## be in order that the object cools as time increases, i.e., so that ##T(t_{2})<T(t_{1})## for ##t_{2}>t_{1}##?
 
k should be positive, but when I plotted a graph of ln (T(t) - TA) vs t, I got a graph of negative k
 
sunmoonlight said:
k should be positive, but when I plotted a graph of ln (T(t) - TA) vs t, I got a graph of negative k
Do you mean you got a graph of negative slope? That slope is not k.
Rearrange the equation into the form kt=… to find out what you should be plotting.
 
sunmoonlight said:
k should be positive, but when I plotted a graph of ln (T(t) - TA) vs t, I got a graph of negative k
Why not just solve the logarithmic-form of the cooling law ##kt=\ln\left(\frac{T\left(0\right)-T_{A}}{T(t)-T_{A}}\right)## for k directly? (In this form it's clear that ##k## must be positive because the argument of the log is greater than 1.)
 
haruspex said:
Do you mean you got a graph of negative slope? That slope is not k.
Rearrange the equation into the form kt=… to find out what you should be plotting.
According to this source, the gradient is k (which is a negative value)
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot 2023-05-24 at 6.00.57 pm.png
    Screenshot 2023-05-24 at 6.00.57 pm.png
    39.3 KB · Views: 108
sunmoonlight said:
According to this source, the gradient is k (which is a negative value)
Note the logarithmic vertical axis
 
sunmoonlight said:
According to this source, the gradient is k (which is a negative value)
Where is ##k## mentioned on that screenshot? As implied in post #45, ##k## is proportional to the negative of ##\ln\left(T(t)-T_{A}\right)##.
 
sunmoonlight said:
According to this source
And what does the label on the y axis say?
 
  • #10
ln T(t) - TA
haruspex said:
And what does the label on the y axis say?
 
  • #11
sunmoonlight said:
ln T(t) - TA
Which is not ##k##.

Now, how do you get ##k## from ##\ln (T(t) - T_A)##?

Note that it is normally incorrect to take the logarithm of a quantity which has units. It is only proper to take the logarithm of a pure number such as a ratio. However ##\ln (\frac{a}{b}) = \ln(a) - \ln(b)##, taking the log of a quantity with units simply has the effect of shifting the graph up or down by the undefined quantity: ##\ln\ \text{<unit>}##.

It is also "challenging" to take the log of a negative number. So rather than simplifying as:$$\ln (\frac{-3}{-2}) = \ln (-3) - \ln(-2)$$one would be better served to simplify to $$\ln (\frac{-3}{-2}) = \ln (\frac{3}{2}) = \ln(3) - \ln(2)$$This will handle the case where ##T(t)## is less than ambient.
 
Last edited:
  • #12
sunmoonlight said:
Should the value of k be positive or negative if an object is cooling down?

To me, this question is meaningless and could be confusing because it is the argument of the exponential that counts. Parameter ##k## is the inverse of a time constant and, as such, it should be positive. With ##k## positive and ##t## also positive, the argument of the exponential must be negative when the object is cooling down and positive when it is heating up. In other words, the negative sign in front of the argument ##kt## is or is not there depending on what one wishes to describe.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: jbriggs444
  • #13
kuruman said:
To me, this question is meaningless and could be confusing because it is the argument of the exponential that counts. Parameter ##k## is the inverse of a time constant and, as such, it should be positive.
Similar to how ##g## is positive and when up is positive, free fall has ##a=-g##.
 
  • #14
sunmoonlight said:
According to this source, the gradient is k (which is a negative value)
##T(t) = T_A + (T_0 - T_A) e ^{-kt}##
##T(t) -T_A = (T_0 - T_A) e ^{-kt}##
##\ln(T(t) -T_A) =\ln( T_0 - T_A)+(-kt)##
So what will be the gradient of ##\ln(T(t) -T_A)## plotted against ##t##?
 
  • #15
haruspex said:
##T(t) = T_A + (T_0 - T_A) e ^{-kt}##
##T(t) -T_A = (T_0 - T_A) e ^{-kt}##
##\ln(T(t) -T_A) =\ln( T_0 - T_A)+(-kt)##
So what will be the gradient of ##\ln(T(t) -T_A)## plotted against ##t##?
-k
 
  • #16
kuruman said:
To me, this question is meaningless and could be confusing because it is the argument of the exponential that counts. Parameter ##k## is the inverse of a time constant and, as such, it should be positive. With ##k## positive and ##t## also positive, the argument of the exponential must be negative when the object is cooling down and positive when it is heating up. In other words, the negative sign in front of the argument ##kt## is or is not there depending on what one wishes to describe.
I got that. Thanks a lot.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: berkeman

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 41 ·
2
Replies
41
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
14
Views
4K
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K