Nobel Prize in medicine: Katalin Karikó and Drew Weissman

  • Context: COVID 
  • Thread starter Thread starter pinball1970
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Medicine Nobel prize
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the awarding of the Nobel Prize in Medicine to Katalin Karikó and Drew Weissman for their contributions to the development of messenger RNA vaccines, particularly in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. Participants explore the historical challenges faced by the laureates, the implications of their research, and the reactions from the academic community.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Historical

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants highlight the unprecedented rate of vaccine development attributed to the laureates' research during a critical health crisis.
  • Others discuss the historical context of Karikó and Weissman's work, noting that they faced significant challenges, including being ostracized and struggling for funding.
  • There are claims that Karikó's demotion at the University of Pennsylvania was due to the perceived risks of her mRNA research and a lack of grant funding.
  • Some participants express frustration with the university's handling of Karikó's career, suggesting that administrators should resign for their past decisions regarding her tenure track status.
  • A participant draws parallels between the treatment of Karikó and other historical figures in science who faced skepticism or rejection, indicating a recurring theme of professional jealousy and resistance to new ideas.
  • There is mention of the broader implications of the laureates' work, with some participants referring to them as "genuine heroes" for their sacrifices and contributions to public health.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of views regarding the recognition of Karikó and Weissman, with some agreeing on the significance of their contributions while others debate the appropriateness of the university's past actions and the implications for academic integrity. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the broader implications of their treatment in the scientific community.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the lack of consensus on the motivations behind the university's decisions regarding Karikó's tenure and the subjective interpretations of her contributions as either groundbreaking or risky. The discussion also reflects varying opinions on the nature of recognition in the scientific community.

pinball1970
Gold Member
2025 Award
Messages
3,673
Reaction score
5,839
TL;DR
Two scientists won the Nobel Prize in medicine on Monday for discoveries that enabled the development of mRNA vaccines against COVID-19
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Astranut, BillTre, russ_watters and 6 others
Biology news on Phys.org
MSN also reported
The Nobel Prize in medicine was awarded Monday to two scientists whose research laid the groundwork for messenger RNA vaccines that transformed the threat of the coronavirus pandemic.

For years, Katalin Kariko, a Hungarian-born scientist whose ferocious and single-minded pursuit of messenger RNA exiled her to the outskirts of science, worked closely with Drew Weissman, an immunologist at the University of Pennsylvania who saw the potential for the technology to create a new kind of vaccine.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/n...dation-for-messenger-rna-vaccines/ar-AA1hyzNR
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: BillTre, Lnewqban and pinball1970
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: pinball1970 and BillTre
sbrothy said:
I'm sure though that even these guys didn't work in a vacuum.

EDIT: As if anyone ever did that.
Their story is worth a read. They were largely ignored, even ostracized for this research. Kariko was demoted over it(repeated failure to get grants). If there's ever a case of two/lone voices shouting into the vacuum in science, this is it.

[extremely late edit]
And I don't use this word lightly: these two are genuine heroes, in the real and ususally comic book sense. Their work required severe personal sacrifice and likely saved literally millions of lives.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: berkeman, sbrothy, Astronuc and 2 others
russ_watters said:
Their story is worth a read. They were largely ignored, even ostracized for this research. Kariko was demoted over it(repeated failure to get grants). If there's ever a case of two/lone voices shouting into the vacuum in science, this is it.

[extremely late edit]
And I don't use this word lightly: these two are genuine heroes, in the real and ususally comic book sense. Their work required severe personal sacrifice and likely saved literally millions of lives.

So once again professional and personal jalouxy rears it's ugly head? It kinda reminds of the whole debacle with "The String Wars" and the Bogdanov affair. Can't remember if it's apocryphal but it reminds me of Einstein's comment when he heard 100 physicists signed a proclamation that his theory was rubbish: "Had I been wrong one would have been enough."
 
Katalin Karikó won this year’s Nobel Prize in Medicine alongside Drew Weissman for their research that led to the development of mRNA Covid-19 vaccines, but a post from the University of Pennsylvania—where Karikó was demoted from tenure track in 1995—claiming her as a Penn researcher angered the medical community.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/health/ot...-academics-urge-penn-to-apologize/ar-AA1hE8A8
Karikó was hired by the University of Pennsylvania in 1989 as an adjunct professor and researcher, where she met and began collaborating with Weissman, a professor of medicine at Penn, in 1997.

Though initially on track to become a tenured professor, the university reportedly offered Karikó a choice to either leave or be demoted with a pay cut in 1995—which she said was “particularly horrible” because she had just been diagnosed with cancer and her husband was stuck in Hungary because of a visa issue—because her mRNA research was deemed too risky and did not attract enough grant funding.

Karikó took the demotion and continued her work, but later left her senior research investigator position at Penn (where she retains an adjunct professorship) in 2013 to serve as vice president at BioNTech—co-manufacturer of the Pfizer-BioNTech Covid-19 vaccine—because Penn refused to reinstate her to a tenure track position, reportedly considering her research “not of faculty quality.”

I think there are a number of U of Penn administrators who need to resign or be fired.
 
  • Like
  • Sad
Likes   Reactions: russ_watters, berkeman and pinball1970
reportedly considering her research “not of faculty quality.”

Legend is that Heidelberg refused to give Rudy Mossbauer a PhD for the Mossbauer effect. A masters was fine, but a doctorate? Just not up to their standards,
 
Astronuc said:
I think there are a number of U of Penn administrators who need to resign or be fired.
Granting tenure or punishing other staff would require admitting the error. That would not play well in the media and marketing campaigns. Best to proudly support her and keep cashing the billion dollar royalty checks.

Now, for spite she could probably donate a bunch of money to build a new building and then exclude her detractors from using it.
 
  • Haha
  • Like
  • Wow
Likes   Reactions: pinball1970, Vanadium 50 and BillTre
Rosalyn Yallow named every journal who rejected her Nobel-winning paper during her Nobel lecture. Spite? Maybe - but funny as well.
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes   Reactions: pinball1970, russ_watters and BillTre

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K