Node Voltage Question: Solve My Attempt!

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the application of the node voltage method in circuit analysis, specifically addressing a homework problem involving node voltages and supernodes. Participants share their attempts at solving the problem, seek clarification on concepts, and discuss the correctness of their mathematical approaches.

Discussion Character

  • Homework-related
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents an initial attempt at a solution and questions whether it meets the assignment's requirements.
  • Another participant expresses confusion about the terminology used, specifically regarding the "node method," and points out potential errors in the algebraic steps provided.
  • A participant suggests that the "node method" likely refers to the nodal voltage method and indicates they will revise their approach.
  • Subsequent attempts involve defining variables and formulating equations, with one participant using a supernode approach.
  • Concerns are raised about the correctness of the current calculations through resistors, particularly regarding the sign of voltage terms in the equations.
  • Participants discuss the implications of defining ground and how it affects voltage calculations across resistors.
  • There is a debate about how to handle voltage sources in series with nodes and the correct formulation of current equations in such scenarios.
  • Clarifications are made regarding the addition of voltages in series and how to represent them in equations.
  • One participant arrives at a corrected equation for current through a resistor that incorporates both a voltage source and another node.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying levels of understanding and correctness regarding the application of the node voltage method and the associated mathematical formulations. There is no clear consensus on the correctness of specific equations, and multiple interpretations of voltage relationships are discussed.

Contextual Notes

Some participants note potential errors in algebraic manipulations and the importance of correctly identifying voltage polarities. The discussion highlights the complexity of applying the node voltage method and the need for careful consideration of circuit elements and their relationships.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be useful for students learning circuit analysis, particularly those focusing on the node voltage method and its application in solving circuit problems.

jegues
Messages
1,085
Reaction score
3

Homework Statement


See Figure


Homework Equations


[tex]\Sigma i_{out} = \Sigma i_{in}[/tex]



The Attempt at a Solution



My attempt is in the figure.

Is this is what they are asking for? Or do I need to add something else? Is what I have correct?

Thanks again!
 

Attachments

  • NVQ.jpg
    NVQ.jpg
    15.7 KB · Views: 529
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm not sure what 'the node method' is, but in your first line you say current + current + voltage + voltage = 0, is this meant to be a kirchhoffs voltage law around a loop somewhere, or kirchhoffs current law at a node somewhere?

Either way, the algebraic maths going from line 2 to line 3 is incorrect, for starters.
 
Last edited:
I think when they refer to the node method they are referring to the nodal voltage method

EDIT: I'm going to try again from scratch and see what I come up with. I will post my results.
 
Here's my 2nd attempt using a super node. (Instead of using [tex]e_{1}[/tex] I simply defined it as [tex]V_{a}[/tex])

EDIT: I fixed that attachment.

So the final equation should be:

[tex]V_{a} = \frac{I + \frac{V_{1}-V_{2}}{R_{3}} + \frac{V_{1}}{R_{2}}}{\frac{1}{R_{2}}+ \frac{1}{R_{2}}+ \frac{1}{R_{3}}}[/tex]
 

Attachments

  • NVQ2.jpg
    NVQ2.jpg
    20.7 KB · Views: 523
Last edited:
If the voltage at the second node is (Va - V1) V, and the voltage on the other side of R3 is V2 V, then the current through R3 (the third term in your first equation) might be wrong.

I'm unfamiliar with the correct analysis process, but otherwise the maths is correct ;)
 
Can anyone else help me verify if I'm doing this correctly please?

I'm doing my best to make a solid attempt in trying to comprehend the node voltage method.
 
In your supernode attempt, your first equation is:

[tex]-I+\frac{V_a}{R_1}+\frac{(V_a-V_1+V_2)}{R_3}+\frac{(V_a-V_1)}{R_2}=0[/tex]

which, with an extra set of parentheses, is:

[tex]-I+\frac{V_a}{R_1}+\frac{((V_a-V_1)+V_2)}{R_3}+\frac{(V_a-V_1)}{R_2}=0[/tex]

Everything is correct except that you have a wrong sign on V2. It should be:

[tex]-I+\frac{V_a}{R_1}+\frac{((V_a-V_1)-V_2)}{R_3}+\frac{(V_a-V_1)}{R_2}=0[/tex]

So, your final solution is correct except for a wrong sign on V2.
 
So, your final solution is correct except for a wrong sign on V2.

Why is V2 negative?
 
The voltage (difference in potential) dropped across a resistor is equal to the higher potential minus the lower potential.

In the case of R1 and R2 you have the ground as the lower potential, which is equal to 0V, and this is the case for most of the introductory equations when you learn about voltages.

[tex]\frac{V_{a} - Gnd}{R_{1}}[/tex] = [tex]\frac{V_{a}}{R_{1}}[/tex]

[tex]\frac{(V_{a} - V_{1}) - Gnd}{R_{2}}[/tex] = [tex]\frac{(V_{a} - V_{1})}{R_{2}}[/tex]

However, in the case of R3, you have V2 as the lower potential.
 
Last edited:
  • #10
jegues said:
Why is V2 negative?

Because the current through a resistor is equal to the difference of the voltages (not the sum) at the two ends of the resistor divided by the resistance.

Zryn said:
The voltage (difference in potential) dropped across a resistor is equal to the higher potential minus the lower potential divided by the resistance.

"The voltage (difference in potential) dropped across a resistor is equal to the higher potential minus the lower potential divided by the resistance."

This would be correct if the part in red is deleted.

Or, one could say:

"The current through a resistor is equal to the higher potential minus the lower potential divided by the resistance."
 
  • #11
Oh right, what he said (busy day = lame mistakes).

Edited for clarity!
 
  • #12
Okay that makes sense.

But what would happen in this case if the other node wasn't my ground node?
 
  • #13
If you're calculating the currents leaving a node, call it Vx, then if a resistor is connected to another node, Vz perhaps, the resistor current is (Vx-Vz)/R. If the resistor is connected to ground then Vz is automatically zero, so the current is (Vx-0)/R = Vx/R.
 
  • #14
Well, if it was V3 for example instead of Gnd, you would put V3 in your algebraic equations instead of Gnd, and then you would put whatever value V3 is instead of 0V for Gnd, and you would end up in the same situation as you have across R3.

[tex]\frac{V_{a} - V_{3}}{R_{1}}[/tex]

[tex]\frac{(V_{a} - V_{1}) - V_{3}}{R_{2}}[/tex]
 
  • #15
The Electrician said:
If you're calculating the currents leaving a node, call it Vx, then if a resistor is connected to another node, Vz perhaps, the resistor current is (Vx-Vz)/R. If the resistor is connected to ground then Vz is automatically zero, so the current is (Vx-0)/R = Vx/R.

I meant what if I have a resistor and a voltage source from one node to another? (A node between the resistor and voltage source isn't required, correct?)

Looks like the following:


NODE A --->--- Resistor --->---- Voltage Source (+ -) --->--- NODE B


Would the equation for the current i simply be,

[tex]\frac{V_{a} + V_{s} - V_{b}}{R}[/tex]

correct?
 
  • #16
Your fraction is incorrect. Keep in mind voltages in series add together.

What is the voltage on the left of the Resistor?

What is the voltage on the right of the Resistor?
 
  • #17
Zryn said:
Your fraction is incorrect. Keep in mind voltages in series add together.

What is the voltage on the left of the Resistor??

[tex]V_{a}[/tex]

What is the voltage on the right of the Resistor?

[tex]V_{s}[/tex]

So,

[tex]\frac{V_{a} - V_{s}}{R}[/tex]

But then what about Node B?
 
  • #18
Voltages in series add together. The Voltage Source and Node B are in series.

* Adding brackets into your equation will help show the two separate voltages on either side of the resistor which are comprised of the three separate voltage sources.
 
  • #19
Yes but isn't the voltage source also in series with Node A as well?

I thought whether I add or subtract the voltage source in my equation had something to do with what terminal the current was entering on the voltage source. Is that wrong? (Current enters positive terminal, you add the voltage source and the opposite if it were entering the negative terminal)
 
  • #20
I think this is merely a terminology problem.

Firstly, you are correct that the Voltage Source and Node A are in series, and in fact every component in your circuit is in series, its a series circuit.

Not every component is a voltage immediately in series with another voltage however. You have Voltage --> Resistance --> Voltage --> Voltage.

Much like multiple resistances immediately in series can be combined to create one effective resistance:

Resistance 1 --> Resistance 2 --> Resistance 3 = Resistance Total by adding R1 + R2 + R3

Multiple voltages immediately in series can be combined to create one effective voltage:

Voltage 1 --> Voltage 2 = Voltage Total by adding V1 + V2.

Going back to your circuit, you have this case with Voltage Source --> Node B.

So, what should the current fraction be?
 
  • #21
Not every component is a voltage immediately in series with another voltage however.

Aha! That was the missing piece!

[tex]\frac{V_{a} - (V_{s} + V_{b})}{R}[/tex]
 
  • #22
Exactly!

Now you should be able to conquer most voltage dividers easily ;).
 
  • #23
Zryn said:
Exactly!

Now you should be able to conquer most voltage dividers easily ;).

Thank you both for your help it is greatly appreciated!
 

Similar threads

Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
6K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K