Non Geodesic Motion: Definition & Explanation

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter emanaly
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Motion
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the definition and explanation of non-geodesic motion within the context of general relativity. Participants explore the characteristics of motion that does not follow geodesics, including the implications of forces acting on particles.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant defines non-geodesic motion as motion that does not follow a geodesic, where geodesics represent paths taken by objects without outside forces acting on them.
  • Another participant elaborates that in general relativity, the world line of a nonspinning test particle is a geodesic, indicating that path curvature relates to the acceleration experienced by the particle.
  • A participant questions the initial definition, suggesting that non-geodesic motion should be described as motion with outside forces, highlighting a potential miscommunication.
  • There is a discussion about spinning particles and their deviation from geodesic paths due to spin-spin forces in a gravitational field, with a reference to the Dixon-Papapetrou equations.
  • Participants express uncertainty regarding the measurability of the forces affecting spinning particles in practical scenarios.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the definition of non-geodesic motion, with some arguing for a clarification regarding the role of outside forces. The discussion includes multiple competing views on the implications of spinning particles and their motion.

Contextual Notes

There are unresolved aspects regarding the definitions of geodesic and non-geodesic motion, as well as the conditions under which forces affect particle trajectories. The discussion also touches on the limitations of current experimental capabilities to measure certain effects.

emanaly
Messages
33
Reaction score
0
What is non geodesic motion?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Obvious definition- motion that does not follow a geodesic! In relativity, geodesics are the paths followed by objects with no "outside" forces acting on them (gravity not being considered an "outside" force here) so non-geodesic motion is motion with no outside forces.
 
Just to elaborate quickly on what HallsofIvy said: in general relativity, the world line of a (nonspinning) test particle is a geodesic, i.e. a curve with zero path curvature. More generally, the path curvature at any event on some world line is just the magnitude of acceleration experienced by the corresponding particle. For example, a charged particle in an "electrovacuum solution" of the Einstein field equation (EFE) will experience a nonzero Lorentz force, whose magnitude (at each event on the world line of the particle) agrees with the path curvature.
 
HallsofIvy said:
non-geodesic motion is motion with no outside forces.
I'm guessing you meant either "geodesic motion is motion with no outside forces" or else "non-geodesic motion is motion with outside forces"?
 
Good catch, JesseM, I missed that! But I am sure HallsofIvy simply mistyped.
 
Chris Hillman said:
Just to elaborate quickly on what HallsofIvy said: in general relativity, the world line of a (nonspinning) test particle is a geodesic, i.e. a curve with zero path curvature. More generally, the path curvature at any event on some world line is just the magnitude of acceleration experienced by the corresponding particle. For example, a charged particle in an "electrovacuum solution" of the Einstein field equation (EFE) will experience a nonzero Lorentz force, whose magnitude (at each event on the world line of the particle) agrees with the path curvature.

Why spinning particles don't have a geodesic path?
 
Spin-spin forces plus an essential PF link

emanaly said:
Why spinning particles don't have a geodesic path?

I didn't quite say that. However, in gtr, a spinning object immersed in a nonzero gravitational field (perhaps caused by a much larger nearby and spinning object) will in general experience a tiny "spin-spin" force and thus will be pushed off a geodesic path. However, these forces would be much too small to measure in any currently envisioned solar system experiments (at least, not any I know of). See for example "Dixon-Papapetrou equations" in Stephani, General relativity.

By the way, I urge all members to carefully read https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=5374 if they have not already done so, and indeed to bookmark it for future reference.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 56 ·
2
Replies
56
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 62 ·
3
Replies
62
Views
5K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
2K