emanaly
- 33
- 0
What is non geodesic motion?
The discussion centers on the definition and explanation of non-geodesic motion within the context of general relativity. Participants explore the characteristics of motion that does not follow geodesics, including the implications of forces acting on particles.
Participants do not reach a consensus on the definition of non-geodesic motion, with some arguing for a clarification regarding the role of outside forces. The discussion includes multiple competing views on the implications of spinning particles and their motion.
There are unresolved aspects regarding the definitions of geodesic and non-geodesic motion, as well as the conditions under which forces affect particle trajectories. The discussion also touches on the limitations of current experimental capabilities to measure certain effects.
I'm guessing you meant either "geodesic motion is motion with no outside forces" or else "non-geodesic motion is motion with outside forces"?HallsofIvy said:non-geodesic motion is motion with no outside forces.
Chris Hillman said:Just to elaborate quickly on what HallsofIvy said: in general relativity, the world line of a (nonspinning) test particle is a geodesic, i.e. a curve with zero path curvature. More generally, the path curvature at any event on some world line is just the magnitude of acceleration experienced by the corresponding particle. For example, a charged particle in an "electrovacuum solution" of the Einstein field equation (EFE) will experience a nonzero Lorentz force, whose magnitude (at each event on the world line of the particle) agrees with the path curvature.
emanaly said:Why spinning particles don't have a geodesic path?