Non Homogeneous Recurrence Relation

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on solving the non-homogeneous recurrence relation given by (n+2)a[n+1] = 2(n+1)a[n] + 2^n, with the initial condition a[0] = 1. The user successfully transformed the equation to (n+1)a[n] - 4(n)a[n] - 14(n-1)a[n-2] = 0, but struggles with the handling of the terms (n+1), n, and (n-1) while seeking particular and homogeneous solutions. The transformation bm = (n+1)a[n] was introduced, leading to a characteristic equation r^2 - 4r + 4 = 0, which has a double root at r = 2, yielding the general solution bm = c1*2^m + c2*m*2^m. The user is uncertain about the next steps for substituting back or utilizing the initial condition.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of recurrence relations and their solutions
  • Familiarity with characteristic equations and roots
  • Knowledge of non-homogeneous recurrence relations
  • Experience with variable substitution techniques in mathematical equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study methods for solving non-homogeneous recurrence relations
  • Learn about the application of initial conditions in recurrence relations
  • Explore variable substitution techniques in recurrence relations
  • Investigate the implications of double roots in characteristic equations
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, computer scientists, and students studying discrete mathematics or algorithm analysis who are looking to deepen their understanding of recurrence relations and their applications.

Ethers0n
Messages
27
Reaction score
0
1. solve the following recurrence relation for an



2. (n+2)an+1= 2(n+1)an+2^{n}, n>=0, a0=1
I shifted the index, multiplied through by the 2^{n} term and then subtracted the resulting equation from the original equation to get rid of the 2^{n} term...


3. I have gotten to this point
(n+1)an-4(n)an-14(n-1)an-2=0


I'm not really sure how to handle the (n+1), n, or (n-1) terms when looking for the particular/ homogeneous solution parts.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
can you see a way to change your variable a(n) that would do it? There is something consistemt between the successive terms.

(You have missed a + out of your formula BTW.)
 
well, if I sub in bm = (n+1)an into the original equation of
(n+2)an+1 = 2(n+1)an+2n
I get
bm+1=2bm+2m
(1) bm+1-2bm=2m
(2) bm-2bm-1=2m-1
(3) 2bm-4bm-1=2m
(1)-(3)
(4) bm+1-4bm+4bm-1=0
(5) bm-4bm-1+4bm-2=0
(6) r2-4r+4=0
(7) (r-2)(r-2)=0
(8) bm= c12m+c2m2m

but I don't really know where to go from there?
do I sub back in, or is there a way to use a0=1 with bm?
I'm getting the feeling that I'm dong something wrong...
 

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K