Non-linear LinesHow to Avoid Lying, without Confusing.

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Bacle
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Confusing Non-linear
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the challenges of teaching the concept of linearity in an introductory Linear Algebra course, particularly the distinction between linear and affine functions. Participants explore how to address terminology issues without causing confusion among students.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses concern that the definition of linear does not apply to lines that do not pass through the origin, suggesting that these should be considered affine objects instead.
  • Another participant proposes that it may not be a significant problem and suggests explaining to students that the term "linear" is a convention used by mathematicians, despite its limitations.
  • A different participant advocates for transparency about the terminology, arguing that students should be made aware of the imperfect definitions and the contexts in which they apply.
  • One participant suggests simply stating that there are multiple definitions of "linear" and clarifying which definition will be used in the course.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on how to address the terminology issue, with differing opinions on whether it is a significant problem and how best to communicate the distinctions to students.

Contextual Notes

There is an acknowledgment of the limitations and potential confusion arising from entrenched terminology in mathematics, as well as the challenge of teaching students to navigate these complexities.

Bacle
Messages
656
Reaction score
1
"Non-linear Lines". How to Avoid Lying, without Confusing.

Hi, everyone:

I will be teaching an intro course in Linear Algebra this Spring.

Problem I am having is that the definition of linear does not

apply to lines that do not go through the origin:

Let L:x-->ax+b

Then L(x+y)=ax+ay+b =/ L(x)+L(y)

similarly: L(cx)=acx+b =/ c(L(x))=cax+cb

Which is true only for c=0 . So lines are affine objects, carelessly described as linear,
as in 'linear equations'

So, how does one reasonably avoid bringing up the issue of affine vs. linear
and still not refer to a collection of equations

ax_i +b=0

as linear equations?
 
Physics news on Phys.org


Is this really a problem? How about telling them something like this: Mathematicians have found it useful to have a term for maps that satisfy T(ax+by)=aTx+bTy. You (the students) will understand why before this course is over. The term they chose for such maps is "linear". It would make just as much sense to use that term for maps that satisfy T(ax+by)=aTx+bTy+z for some z, because all such maps take straight lines to straight lines. The problem is, if we call the members of this larger set of maps "linear", then what do we call "linear maps with z=0"? "Linear and origin-preserving"? This gets annoying pretty quickly, so we just call them "linear".


Student: OK, but then what do we call the maps with arbitrary z?

Teacher: **** you!
 


I'm glad someone is giving this topic consideration.

Let us generalise (as mathematicians are won't to do).

Thre are many examples where less than perfect terminology has arisen, become entrenched and become the source of confusion.
All too often this is hidden by promoting a simplified definition, hammered into earlier years students, who then find it difficult to 'unlearn' the half truth in order to embrace the wider picture.

Why not simply be up front about this and explain that there is some unfortunate terminology so careful attention needs to be placed upon the boundaries within which your definitions apply.

In all conscience students who go on to greater things will meet plenty of such examples in their future studies. The rest need not worry, but simply stay within the guidelines.
 


Just say there are (at least) two different definitions of "linear".

Even the OED gives multiple definitions of words.

And that in this course, we use this particular definition throughout.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K