Non-Magnifying Telescope Lenses: Components & Effects

  • Context: Stargazing 
  • Thread starter Thread starter mufan
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Lenses Telescope
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the components and functionality of telescope lenses, particularly focusing on the potential for non-magnifying configurations and the use of different types of lenses in eyepieces. Participants explore the implications of using single versus multiple lenses in telescopes, addressing both theoretical and practical aspects.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions if adding another lens could negate the magnifying effect of a telescope, seeking to understand which type of lens might achieve this.
  • Clarification is provided that a refracting telescope typically uses two convex lenses, while a reflecting telescope uses one mirror and one convex lens.
  • There is a discussion about the use of a single concave lens as an eyepiece, referencing Galileo's design, and questioning why modern telescopes often use multiple lenses instead.
  • Concerns are raised about drawbacks of using simple lenses, such as chromatic aberration and coma, and the advantages of using multiple lenses to correct these issues.
  • Participants note that multiple lens designs, like Plossl eyepieces, are effective in narrowing the light cone and improving image quality while being easier to produce than complex lens shapes.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying opinions on the necessity and effectiveness of using multiple lenses in eyepieces, with some supporting the idea while others question the drawbacks of simpler designs. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the optimal configuration for eyepieces.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the lack of consensus on the best lens configuration for telescopes and the specific conditions under which different types of lenses may perform better or worse.

mufan
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
The components of a telescope are essentially two convex lenses? Out of curiosity (boredom) I am trying to figure out if the addition of another lens could make the image non-magnified.



For instance, what type of lens/other would you add in order to make the image look as if you were looking through a paper towel cardboard tube. In other words, what type of lens would cancel out the magnifying effect of a telescope if it were put in line with the other lenses?



It's how my mind works...I can't help it!
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
mufan said:
The components of a telescope are essentially two convex lenses?
Only a refracting scope.

A reflector uses one mirror and one convex lens.
 
I assume you mean the eyepiece, Dave.
 
Chronos said:
I assume you mean the eyepiece, Dave.
Well, I wasn't being specific but yes, it is the eyepiece.
 
Hi all,

By the way, I've got a small question relating the telescope. Can I use only one concave lens for the eyepiece?. Why do they have to use a stack of lenses instead of just one lens for eyepiece?

Thanks
 
pixel01 said:
Hi all,

By the way, I've got a small question relating the telescope. Can I use only one concave lens for the eyepiece?. Why do they have to use a stack of lenses instead of just one lens for eyepiece?

Thanks

You can use one concave lens as the eyepiece, Galileo did!

A typical Galilean telescope with which Jupiter's moons could be observed was configured as follows. It had a plano-convex objective (the lens toward the object) with a focal length of about 30-40 inches., and a plano-concave ocular with a focal length of about 2 inches. The ocular was in a little tube that could be adjusted for focusing.

Garth
 
Garth said:
You can use one concave lens as the eyepiece, Galileo did!



Garth

Thanks for your reply. The thing is why do they have to use some other lens stack but not only a concave as eyepiece like Galileo? There must be some drawbacks mustn't there? What are they?
 
pixel01 said:
Thanks for your reply. The thing is why do they have to use some other lens stack but not only a concave as eyepiece like Galileo? There must be some drawbacks mustn't there? What are they?
Some drawbacks with lenses include the fact that simple lenses do no bring all wavelengths to the same focus. This is called chromatic aberration. Reflectors usually feature a concave primary mirror, and a flat secondary mirror, and that secondary mirror aims the light to the eyepiece. In this basic design (Newtonian), there is no chromatic aberration aside from that induced by the lenses in the eyepiece, but it is very likely that off-axis images will suffer from coma, which is radial deformation. Apochromatic refractors can offer highly-corrected views with minimun chromatic aberration if they are designed with several objective lenses with a variety of curves and correspondingly tuned refractive indexes. Roland Christen is a master of this art as was Thomas Back (recently departed).
 
The mulitply lensed eyepieces, as noted by Turbo, correct for both chromatic aberation and, to a lesser extent, coma. They also narrow the light cone of the primary aperature to the size of the pupil of the human eye. The eyepiece is just as important as the primary aperature for visual observation. Plossl's, for example, require several individual simple lenses to produce their visually impressive images. Multiple lens are economical because simple correctors are much easier to produce than complex shapes. They are also very efficient, thanks to anti-reflective coatings, wasting only a tiny fraction of the light that passes through them.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 125 ·
5
Replies
125
Views
8K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
3K
  • · Replies 54 ·
2
Replies
54
Views
8K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
5K