Nonconservative Force Question-

  • Thread starter Thread starter perfectionist17
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Force
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on calculating the average coefficient of friction for a skier gliding up an 18-degree incline at an initial speed of 12 m/s. The skier travels 12.2 meters before coming to rest, leading to the application of the work-energy principle. The user derived the force of friction (Ff) as 2.92m, resulting in the coefficient of friction (u) being calculated as 2.92m/9.8mcos18. The user seeks clarification on whether the x-component of weight (mgsin18) should be considered in the friction force calculation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the work-energy principle in physics
  • Knowledge of forces acting on an object on an incline
  • Familiarity with trigonometric functions related to angles
  • Ability to manipulate equations involving mass and acceleration due to gravity
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the work-energy theorem in detail
  • Learn about forces on inclined planes, specifically friction and normal forces
  • Explore the concept of nonconservative forces in physics
  • Review problems involving coefficients of friction and their calculations
USEFUL FOR

Students preparing for AP Physics exams, physics educators, and anyone interested in understanding the dynamics of motion on inclined planes and frictional forces.

perfectionist17
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Nonconservative Force Question--URGENT!

A skier traveling 12 m/s reaches the foot of a steady upward 18 degree incline and glides 12.2 meters up along this slope before coming to rest. What was the average coefficient of friction?Work nonconservative= mechanicalenergyfinal-mechanicalenergyinitial

SO
Wnc= (1/2mvf^2+mghf)- (1/2mvi^2-mghi)

i used Ff= force of friction, and 3.7 coming from sin 18= (x/12.2)- 3.7 is the height of the incline plane.
m= mass

Ff*12.2= (9.8)(3.7)m-(1/2(12.0^2))m

and got Ff(12.2)= 35.74 m

so Ff= 2.92m, which means the coefficient of friction, u= 2.92m/9.8mcos18, the masses then cancelling out.

my question is, do you have to take the x-component of weight into account at all? does it affect the force of friction and thus the coefficient of friction? or do you just ignore the x-compent of weight, mgsin18?

any help would be very much appreciated, I've been debating this all weekend- thank you in advance!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Looks to me like everything is correct.
 
thank you very much, learningphysics! you have no idea how much better that makes me feel- i have a test tomorrow in ap physics! :-) that's what i thought, i just wasn't sure and i KNOW there'll be a problem like that on the test..
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
9K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
12K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
18
Views
3K