Nonhomogeneous second order linear differential equations

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around solving the nonhomogeneous second-order linear differential equation y'' + 3y' + 2y = e^x + e^-x. The confusion arises regarding the introduction of an "x" next to the coefficient B in the particular solution due to e^x being a solution to the homogeneous part of the equation. To address this, the method of undetermined coefficients suggests multiplying by x to find a suitable particular solution. Participants emphasize the importance of understanding this method and its application in cases where the right-hand side includes terms that are solutions to the left-hand side. Overall, the conversation highlights the need for clarity in applying techniques for finding particular solutions in differential equations.
Ortix
Messages
63
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


i'm supposed to find the general solution of the equation: y'' + 3y' + 2y = e^x + e^-x

Homework Equations


I have no problem with solving this equation however, i am confused with the step they are taking in the solutions (circled):
http://img522.imageshack.us/img522/7122/calcwtf.jpg

Where does that x come from next to the B? I have been looking in my book, but there is no example with this kind of solution (right hand side)

The Attempt at a Solution


i got up to the auxiliary equation and i get stuck with finding the particular solution. I'm not sure what to do here... For single variable and products as the solution i have no problem.. the addition is no biggie either (i just separate them) but the step shown above just throws me off.

help is obviously very much appreciated! :)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Ortix! :smile:

(try using the X2 icon just above the Reply box :wink:)
Ortix said:
y'' + 3y' + 2y = e^x + e^-x

Where does that x come from next to the B?

As you obviously know, when ekx is on the RHS, you generally try a multiple of it as part of a particular solution.

however, in this case, the fact that ekx (with k = -1) is already a solution to the LHS means that it can't work …

in this case, we "go up one" and use xekx instead

(and if k was an nth root for the LHS, we'd use xnekx :wink:)
 
It is a part of a system called "Method of undetermined coefficients" for finding a particular solution for a constant coefficient linear ODE.

Read it thorough and you will know that the template is the correct template for finding a particular solution to that ODE.
 
i'm still not TOO clear about this.. i will follow up on gomunkul51's suggestion and read about that. I found it in my book. If i experience more difficulties, I shall return to the land of the smart =).. next year tho!

Happy new year everyone, I'm out to celebrate!
 
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K