Nonlinear gravity as a classical field theory

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the perihelion shift of Mercury using dimensional analysis within the framework of nonlinear gravity as a classical field theory. The Lagrangian is simplified to identify the dimensions of terms, specifically determining that b equals -1. The equations of motion derived from the Lagrangian are used to solve for the gravitational potential h, which leads to Mercury's orbital frequency depending on the masses involved and the distance from the Sun. A second-order correction to the orbital frequency is estimated, along with the effects of other planets on Mercury's orbit. The discussion concludes with considerations on the observability of these shifts for both Mercury and Venus.
spaghetti3451
Messages
1,311
Reaction score
31

Homework Statement



In this problem, you will calculate the perihelion shift of Mercury simply by dimensional analysis.

(a) The interactions in gravity have

##\mathcal{L}=M^{2}_{Pl}\Big(-\frac{1}{2}h_{\mu\nu}\Box h_{\mu\nu}+(\partial_{\alpha}h_{\mu\nu})(\partial_{\beta}h_{\mu\alpha})h_{\nu\beta}+\cdots\Big)-h_{\mu\nu}T_{\mu\nu},\qquad\qquad (1)##

where ##M_{Pl}=\frac{1}{\sqrt{G_{N}}}## is the Planck scale. Rescaling ##h##, and dropping indices and numbers of order ##1##, this simplifies to

##\mathcal{L}=-\frac{1}{2}h\Box h+(M_{Pl})^{a}h^{2}\Box h-(M_{Pl})^{b}hT.\qquad\qquad (2)##

What are ##a## and ##b## (i.e. what are the dimensions of these terms)?

(b) The equations of motion following from this Lagrangian are (roughly)

##\Box h = (M_{Pl})^{a}\Box (h^{2})-(M_{Pl})^{b}T.\qquad\qquad (3)##

For a point source ##T=m\delta^{(3)}(x)##, solve Eq. (3) for ##h## to second order in the source ##T## (or equivalently to third order in ##M_{Pl}^{-1}##). You may use the Coulomb solution we already derived.

(c) To first order, ##h## is just the Newtonian potential. This causes Mercury to orbit. What is Mercury's orbital frequency, ##\omega=\frac{2\pi}{T}##? How does it depend on ##m_{\text{Mercury}}##, ##m_{\text{Sun}}##, ##M_{Pl}## and the distance ##R## between Mercury and the Sun?

(d) To second order, there is a correction that causes a small shift Mercury's orbit. Estimate the order of magnitude of the correction to ##w## in arcseconds/century using your second-order solution.

(e) Estimate how big the effect is of other planets on Mercury's orbital frequency. (Dimensional analysis will do - just get the right powers of masses and distances.)

(f) Do you think the shifts from either the second-order correction or from the other planets should be observable for Mercury? What about for Venus?

(g) If you derive Eq. (3) from Eq. (2), what additional terms do you get? Why is it OK to use Eq. (3) without these terms?

Homework Equations



The Attempt at a Solution



(a) I understand what it means to rescale ##h## and drop indices.

In particular, for the first term, ##h\Box h = M^{2}_{Pi}h_{\mu\nu}\Box h_{\mu\nu}## so that ##h=M^{2}_{Pi}h_{\mu\nu}.##

Therefore, for the third term, ##h_{\mu\nu}T_{\mu\nu}=(M_{Pl})^{b}hT## which implies ##h_{\mu\nu}T_{\mu\nu}=(M_{Pl})^{b}(M_{Pl}h_{\mu\nu})T## so that ##b=-1.##What does it mean to drop numbers of order ##1##? What are the numbers of order ##1## here anyway?
 
failexam said:

Homework Statement



In this problem, you will calculate the perihelion shift of Mercury simply by dimensional analysis.

(a) The interactions in gravity have

##\mathcal{L}=M^{2}_{Pl}\Big(-\frac{1}{2}h_{\mu\nu}\Box h_{\mu\nu}+(\partial_{\alpha}h_{\mu\nu})(\partial_{\beta}h_{\mu\alpha})h_{\nu\beta}+\cdots\Big)-h_{\mu\nu}T_{\mu\nu},\qquad\qquad (1)##

where ##M_{Pl}=\frac{1}{\sqrt{G_{N}}}## is the Planck scale. Rescaling ##h##, and dropping indices and numbers of order ##1##, this simplifies to

##\mathcal{L}=-\frac{1}{2}h\Box h+(M_{Pl})^{a}h^{2}\Box h-(M_{Pl})^{b}hT.\qquad\qquad (2)##

What are ##a## and ##b## (i.e. what are the dimensions of these terms)?

(b) The equations of motion following from this Lagrangian are (roughly)

##\Box h = (M_{Pl})^{a}\Box (h^{2})-(M_{Pl})^{b}T.\qquad\qquad (3)##

For a point source ##T=m\delta^{(3)}(x)##, solve Eq. (3) for ##h## to second order in the source ##T## (or equivalently to third order in ##M_{Pl}^{-1}##). You may use the Coulomb solution we already derived.

(c) To first order, ##h## is just the Newtonian potential. This causes Mercury to orbit. What is Mercury's orbital frequency, ##\omega=\frac{2\pi}{T}##? How does it depend on ##m_{\text{Mercury}}##, ##m_{\text{Sun}}##, ##M_{Pl}## and the distance ##R## between Mercury and the Sun?

(d) To second order, there is a correction that causes a small shift Mercury's orbit. Estimate the order of magnitude of the correction to ##w## in arcseconds/century using your second-order solution.

(e) Estimate how big the effect is of other planets on Mercury's orbital frequency. (Dimensional analysis will do - just get the right powers of masses and distances.)

(f) Do you think the shifts from either the second-order correction or from the other planets should be observable for Mercury? What about for Venus?

(g) If you derive Eq. (3) from Eq. (2), what additional terms do you get? Why is it OK to use Eq. (3) without these terms?

Homework Equations



The Attempt at a Solution



(a) I understand what it means to rescale ##h## and drop indices.

In particular, for the first term, ##h\Box h = M^{2}_{Pi}h_{\mu\nu}\Box h_{\mu\nu}## so that ##h=M^{2}_{Pi}h_{\mu\nu}.##

Therefore, for the third term, ##h_{\mu\nu}T_{\mu\nu}=(M_{Pl})^{b}hT## which implies ##h_{\mu\nu}T_{\mu\nu}=(M_{Pl})^{b}(M_{Pl}h_{\mu\nu})T## so that ##b=-1.##What does it mean to drop numbers of order ##1##? What are the numbers of order ##1## here anyway?
They mean the terms of order ##M_{Pl}^0 ##, i.e. with no factors of the Planck mass. These would appear if one would include more of the terms that are not shown (where the three dots are). These three dots contain terms that contain factors ##\frac{1}{M_P^2}, \frac{1}{M_P^4} ## and so on. Since they get multiplied by ##M_P^0##, they start at order ##M_P^0##. They therefore basically mean that one should neglect all the terms that are implicitly contained in the three dots.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K