Normal Force between accelerating blocks

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves three blocks resting on a frictionless horizontal table, with specific masses and an applied horizontal force. The objective is to determine the normal force between the second and third blocks while considering the acceleration of the system.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the need to isolate the third block to analyze the forces acting on it. There is confusion regarding the relevance of weight in this context and how to incorporate the applied force into the calculations. Some participants question the correct approach to finding the normal force and the relationship between the applied force and the acceleration of the blocks.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants exploring different interpretations of the forces at play. Some guidance has been offered regarding the isolation of blocks and the consideration of horizontal forces, but there is no consensus on the next steps or the correct calculations.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working under the constraints of a homework assignment, which may limit the information they can use or the methods they can apply. There is also uncertainty regarding the mass of the second block and how it affects the overall system.

disque
Messages
29
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Three blocks rest on a frictionless, horizontal table (see figure below), with m1 = 8 kg and m3 = 15 kg. A horizontal force F = 104 N is applied to block 1, and the acceleration of all three blocks is found to be 3.2 m/s2.


Homework Equations


W=mg
F=ma
Normal Force=Weight (horizontal surface)


The Attempt at a Solution


First off, I had to find the mass of the second block which was just 9.5, but the second part of the problem wants me to find the normal force between blocks 2 and 3. I thought you just added the weights of the two together which gave me 240.1(240 w/ sig figs) but that was wrong. I am thinking I have to incorporate the force they gave me somewhere in the problem, the problem is just where? Please help if you have time I would appreciate it. Thanks a lot. I attached the picture given too by the way.
 

Attachments

  • physics.jpg
    physics.jpg
    31.5 KB · Views: 531
Physics news on Phys.org
Think of the third block in isolation?

Isn't the force on it what accelerates it at 3.2 m/s2
 
I don't understand what you are trying to say. I realize if I just look at the third block in isolation then W would equal 147 which is the mass times g. Is that correct, and what do I do from there?
 
Anybody know this? I am still lost.
Thanks a lot
 
disque said:
I don't understand what you are trying to say. I realize if I just look at the third block in isolation then W would equal 147 which is the mass times g. Is that correct, and what do I do from there?
That's correct, but the weight is irrelevant. (The vertical forces cancel.) Consider the horizontal forces acting on the blocks.
 
I've tried 104 and that is incorrect...?
 
negative is incorrect as well, just thought I'd try that and no luck. :(
 
disque said:
I've tried 104 and that is incorrect...?

But 104 N is accelerating all of the masses isn't it?

What is the mass of the 3rd block? If 104 N was accelerating the 3rd block it would be going faster. But it isn't. So what force is required to accelerate the 3rd block at the same rate as all the blocks are being accelerated by the 104 N?
 
disque said:
I've tried 104 and that is incorrect...?
The 104 N force acts on block 1 and accelerates the entire set of blocks (as LowlyPion explains); it does not directly act on block 3. You have to figure out the force acting on block 3 (which is the normal force from block 2). Luckily, you know its mass and acceleration and Newton's 2nd law.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
13
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
2K