Normal incidence of a plane polarized wave through multiple mediums

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on calculating the amplitudes of a plane polarized wave as it traverses four different media, specifically focusing on the reflection coefficients and the resulting complex amplitudes. The user successfully derived the reflection coefficients as ##\rho_{01}= - \frac 1 2##, ##\rho_{12}= \frac 1 2##, and ##\rho_{23}= \frac 1 3##, and calculated the amplitudes in terms of the initial amplitude ##E_0## for each medium. The final results show that ##E_1= \frac {E_0} 3##, ##E_2= - \frac 3 {16} E_0 (1+j\sqrt3)##, and ##E_3 = \frac {E_0} 4 (-1 +j\sqrt3)##, indicating the presence of complex amplitudes in the third and fourth media.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of wave propagation in different media
  • Familiarity with reflection coefficients and their calculations
  • Knowledge of complex numbers and Euler's equation
  • Proficiency in using LaTeX for mathematical expressions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of reflection coefficients in multi-layer systems
  • Learn about the physical interpretation of complex amplitudes in wave mechanics
  • Explore the application of continuity conditions at boundaries between different media
  • Investigate the relationship between dielectric constants and wave propagation
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, particularly those specializing in optics and wave mechanics, as well as engineers working with electromagnetic wave propagation in various media.

DannyJ108
Messages
23
Reaction score
2
Homework Statement
Find the amplitudes of the wave in each medium
Relevant Equations
##E_i = E_i e^{-jK_i z} +E^'_i e^{jK_i z}##
Hello everybody,

I have to find the amplitudes of a wave that goes through 4 different mediums in terms of ##E_0##, suffering reflection in the first three but not the last one. I calculated the corresponding reflection indexes of the three mediums (all of them real).
Following calculations, I find that the first and second amplitudes are real, but I get that the ones in the third and last medium are complex. I developed Eulers equation ##e^{jx}## and got a real and imaginary component for these amplitudes. Is this correct? Or how can I interpret this?

Thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Can you write the reflection equation that you are using? And what are the dielectric constants of each medium? Can you show your calculations in detail? (preferably using LaTeX) Thank you.
 
Assuming the wave travels in direction ##z## and ##E## in direction ##x##, and ##H## in direction ##y##, putting the system reference ##z=0## at the first boundary between mediums 0 and 1, and being:

##Medium 1 = 2cm##
##Medium 2 =3 cm##
##Medium 3 = Indefinite##

For mediums 0-3 (being ##n_0=1## (air), ##n_1=3, n_2=2, n_3=1##), just substitute ##i## for each medium:

## E_{ix} = E_i e^{-jK_iz} + E^{'}_i e^{jK_iz}##
## H_{iy} = \frac {E_i} {\eta_i}e^{-jK_iz} + \frac {E^{'}_i} {\eta_i}e^{jK_iz}##

For medium 4 (no reflection):

## E_{3x} = E_3 e^{-jK_3z}##
## H_{3y} = \frac {E_3} {\eta_3}e^{-jK_3z}##

Using the following and taking d as 0,01 m:

##\rho_{01}= \left. \frac {E^{'}_0 e^{jK_0z}} {E_0 e^{-jK_0z}} \right|_{z=0} \Rightarrow E^{'}_0 = E_0 \rho_{01}##
##\rho_{12}= \left. \frac {E^{'}_1 e^{jK_1z}} {E_1 e^{-jK_1z}} \right|_{z=2d} \Rightarrow E^{'}_1 = E_1 \rho_{12} e^{-4jK_1d}##
##\rho_{23}= \left. \frac {E^{'}_2 e^{jK_2z}} {E_2 e^{-jK_2z}} \right|_{z=5d} \Rightarrow E^{'}_2 = E_2 \rho_{23} e^{-10jK_1d}##

Aplying continuity conditions ##E_i(z)=E_{i+1}(z)## at ##z=0, z=2d, z=5d## and solving the equation systems, I get that the reflection coefficients are:

##\rho_{01}= - \frac 1 2##
##\rho_{12}= \frac 1 2##
##\rho_{23}= \frac 1 3##

Taking into account that ##k_i = \frac \omega {v_i}##, operating using relations between ##\eta, \epsilon, c## and ##n##, I can figure out each ##k##.
So, substituting in my ##E^{'}_0, E^{'}_1, E^{'}_2## formulas and then in the field equations I get:

## E_{0x} = E_0 e^{-jK_0z} - \frac {E_0} 2 e^{jK_0z}##
## H_{0y} = \frac {E_0} {\eta_0}e^{-jK_0z} + \frac {E_0} {2 \eta_i}e^{jK_0z}##

## E_{1x} = E_1 e^{-jK_1z} + \frac {E_1} 2 e^{jK_1z}##
## H_{1y} = \frac {E_1} {\eta_1}e^{-jK_1z} - \frac {E_1} {2 \eta_i}e^{jK_1z}##

## E_{2x} = E_2 e^{-jK_2z} + \frac {E_2} 3 \left(- \frac 1 2 -j \frac {\sqrt3} 2 \right)e^{jK_2z}##
## H_{1y} = \frac {E_2} {\eta_2}e^{-jK_2z} -\frac {E_2} {3 \eta_2} \left(- \frac 1 2 -j \frac {\sqrt3} 2 \right)e^{jK_2z}##

## E_{3x} = E_3 e^{-jK_3z} ##
## H_{3y} = \frac {E_3} {\eta_3}e^{-jK_3z} ##

So applying again continuityconditions, but with these equations at the layer boundaries, I get that the amplitudes in terms of ##E_0## are:

##E_1= \frac {E_0} 3##
##E_2= - \frac 3 {16} E_0 (1+j\sqrt3)##
##E_3 = \frac {E_0} 4 (-1 +j\sqrt3)##

I don't know if this is correct or not.
I'm so frustrated with this exercise, I can't figure out if this is correct and don't know how to interpret it or if it's plain wrong. Please help. I put a lot of effort into writing all this in LaTex, didn't have much idea how to first. Thank you in advance kind sir!
 
No worries. I found the solution on my own
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: berkeman

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
11K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K