Normal incidence of a plane polarized wave through multiple mediums

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the behavior of a plane polarized wave as it travels through four different mediums, focusing on the amplitudes of the wave and the effects of reflection at the boundaries between these mediums. The original poster is particularly concerned with the interpretation of complex amplitudes obtained during calculations.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster outlines their calculations involving reflection coefficients and continuity conditions at the boundaries of the mediums. They express uncertainty regarding the interpretation of complex amplitudes derived from their equations. Other participants inquire about the reflection equation used and the dielectric constants of each medium, requesting detailed calculations.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants actively engaging in clarifying the original poster's approach and seeking additional details about the calculations. There is no explicit consensus yet, as the original poster is still grappling with the interpretation of their results.

Contextual Notes

The original poster mentions feeling frustrated and uncertain about the correctness of their findings, indicating a personal challenge in understanding the implications of complex amplitudes in this context.

DannyJ108
Messages
23
Reaction score
2
Homework Statement
Find the amplitudes of the wave in each medium
Relevant Equations
##E_i = E_i e^{-jK_i z} +E^'_i e^{jK_i z}##
Hello everybody,

I have to find the amplitudes of a wave that goes through 4 different mediums in terms of ##E_0##, suffering reflection in the first three but not the last one. I calculated the corresponding reflection indexes of the three mediums (all of them real).
Following calculations, I find that the first and second amplitudes are real, but I get that the ones in the third and last medium are complex. I developed Eulers equation ##e^{jx}## and got a real and imaginary component for these amplitudes. Is this correct? Or how can I interpret this?

Thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Can you write the reflection equation that you are using? And what are the dielectric constants of each medium? Can you show your calculations in detail? (preferably using LaTeX) Thank you.
 
Assuming the wave travels in direction ##z## and ##E## in direction ##x##, and ##H## in direction ##y##, putting the system reference ##z=0## at the first boundary between mediums 0 and 1, and being:

##Medium 1 = 2cm##
##Medium 2 =3 cm##
##Medium 3 = Indefinite##

For mediums 0-3 (being ##n_0=1## (air), ##n_1=3, n_2=2, n_3=1##), just substitute ##i## for each medium:

## E_{ix} = E_i e^{-jK_iz} + E^{'}_i e^{jK_iz}##
## H_{iy} = \frac {E_i} {\eta_i}e^{-jK_iz} + \frac {E^{'}_i} {\eta_i}e^{jK_iz}##

For medium 4 (no reflection):

## E_{3x} = E_3 e^{-jK_3z}##
## H_{3y} = \frac {E_3} {\eta_3}e^{-jK_3z}##

Using the following and taking d as 0,01 m:

##\rho_{01}= \left. \frac {E^{'}_0 e^{jK_0z}} {E_0 e^{-jK_0z}} \right|_{z=0} \Rightarrow E^{'}_0 = E_0 \rho_{01}##
##\rho_{12}= \left. \frac {E^{'}_1 e^{jK_1z}} {E_1 e^{-jK_1z}} \right|_{z=2d} \Rightarrow E^{'}_1 = E_1 \rho_{12} e^{-4jK_1d}##
##\rho_{23}= \left. \frac {E^{'}_2 e^{jK_2z}} {E_2 e^{-jK_2z}} \right|_{z=5d} \Rightarrow E^{'}_2 = E_2 \rho_{23} e^{-10jK_1d}##

Aplying continuity conditions ##E_i(z)=E_{i+1}(z)## at ##z=0, z=2d, z=5d## and solving the equation systems, I get that the reflection coefficients are:

##\rho_{01}= - \frac 1 2##
##\rho_{12}= \frac 1 2##
##\rho_{23}= \frac 1 3##

Taking into account that ##k_i = \frac \omega {v_i}##, operating using relations between ##\eta, \epsilon, c## and ##n##, I can figure out each ##k##.
So, substituting in my ##E^{'}_0, E^{'}_1, E^{'}_2## formulas and then in the field equations I get:

## E_{0x} = E_0 e^{-jK_0z} - \frac {E_0} 2 e^{jK_0z}##
## H_{0y} = \frac {E_0} {\eta_0}e^{-jK_0z} + \frac {E_0} {2 \eta_i}e^{jK_0z}##

## E_{1x} = E_1 e^{-jK_1z} + \frac {E_1} 2 e^{jK_1z}##
## H_{1y} = \frac {E_1} {\eta_1}e^{-jK_1z} - \frac {E_1} {2 \eta_i}e^{jK_1z}##

## E_{2x} = E_2 e^{-jK_2z} + \frac {E_2} 3 \left(- \frac 1 2 -j \frac {\sqrt3} 2 \right)e^{jK_2z}##
## H_{1y} = \frac {E_2} {\eta_2}e^{-jK_2z} -\frac {E_2} {3 \eta_2} \left(- \frac 1 2 -j \frac {\sqrt3} 2 \right)e^{jK_2z}##

## E_{3x} = E_3 e^{-jK_3z} ##
## H_{3y} = \frac {E_3} {\eta_3}e^{-jK_3z} ##

So applying again continuityconditions, but with these equations at the layer boundaries, I get that the amplitudes in terms of ##E_0## are:

##E_1= \frac {E_0} 3##
##E_2= - \frac 3 {16} E_0 (1+j\sqrt3)##
##E_3 = \frac {E_0} 4 (-1 +j\sqrt3)##

I don't know if this is correct or not.
I'm so frustrated with this exercise, I can't figure out if this is correct and don't know how to interpret it or if it's plain wrong. Please help. I put a lot of effort into writing all this in LaTex, didn't have much idea how to first. Thank you in advance kind sir!
 
No worries. I found the solution on my own
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: berkeman

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
11K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K