Normal Vector & Acceleration: An Explanation for Julien

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on the concepts of normal vectors and acceleration in the context of special relativity, specifically regarding the relationship between arclength and time as parameters. Julien seeks clarification on the normal vector defined as \(\vec{e_N} = \frac{d}{ds} \vec{e_T} \cdot \frac{1}{\mid \frac{d}{ds} \cdot \vec{e_T} \mid}\) and its interpretation as a component of acceleration. The discussion highlights the transition from time to arclength in the parameterization of motion, emphasizing the formula \(\mid \frac{d^2 \vec{x}}{ds^2} \mid = \frac{1}{R}\), which relates curvature to acceleration.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of special relativity concepts
  • Familiarity with vector calculus, particularly tangent and normal vectors
  • Knowledge of parameterization of curves in physics
  • Basic grasp of curvature and its relation to acceleration
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of normal vectors in vector calculus
  • Learn about the relationship between arclength and time in motion parameterization
  • Explore the implications of curvature on acceleration in classical mechanics
  • Investigate the role of normal acceleration in the context of circular motion
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, particularly those studying special relativity, mathematicians interested in vector calculus, and anyone seeking to deepen their understanding of motion in curved paths.

JulienB
Messages
408
Reaction score
12
Hi everybody! I'm currently learning special relativity, and I'm going through the chapter of tangent, normal and binormal vectors. In my teacher's script, the definition of the normal vector eN says:

\vec{e_N} = \frac{d}{ds} \vec{e_T} \cdot \frac{1}{\mid \frac{d}{ds} \cdot \vec{e_T} \mid} = \frac{ \frac{d^2}{ds^2} \vec{x(s)}}{\mid \frac{d^2}{ds^2} \vec{x(s)} \mid}

I think I understand the first equality with the first derivative of the tangent unit vector, but I am unsure to what means the equality: it looks like some sort of acceleration relative to the arclength instead of time, and I guess from that equality that its vector is perpendicular to the trajectory. Is it simply the normal component of acceleration?

There is kind of an explanation earlier in the script but I'm not sure I get it really:

s = s(t) \implies t = t(s) \implies \vec{x(t)} = \vec{x [t(s)]} = \vec{x(s)}<br />

At the end I don't really get how (and why) it goes from time as a parameter to the arclength. Could someone possibly give me a hint?

Thank you very much in advance.Julien.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
A little later in the script, I found:

\mid \frac{d^2 \vec{x}}{ds^2} \mid = \frac{1}{R} with R being the radius of the curve. I'm also confused about this formula, it seems to me it would make a part of the acceleration depending on the radius of the curve.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 146 ·
5
Replies
146
Views
12K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
26
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
1K