Normalisation and normalising wavefunctions

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of normalization of wavefunctions in quantum mechanics, focusing on the reasons for normalization, the process involved, and its implications. Participants explore both the mathematical and physical significance of normalization in the context of probability calculations related to wavefunctions.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions the necessity and methodology of normalizing wavefunctions, expressing a lack of background in statistics.
  • Another participant explains that normalization allows for the calculation of probabilities by integrating the product of the wavefunction and its complex conjugate over a specified range.
  • A third participant asserts that normalization is primarily a mathematical technique for probability calculations and claims it lacks physical significance in the wave equation.
  • A later reply agrees with the mathematical perspective but cautions that this view may not be universally accepted among instructors, highlighting the importance of understanding the property of being normalizable.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the physical significance of normalization, with some arguing it is merely a mathematical tool while others suggest it may have important implications. No consensus is reached regarding the overall significance of normalization in wavefunctions.

Contextual Notes

There are unresolved assumptions regarding the physical interpretation of normalization and the implications of wavefunction properties. The discussion also reflects varying perspectives on the teaching of this topic in academic settings.

Who May Find This Useful

Students and educators in quantum mechanics, particularly those interested in the mathematical foundations and interpretations of wavefunctions and probability in quantum systems.

indeterminate
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
In our physics class of quantum mechanics, we constantly talk about normalisation and normalising wavefunctions such that the total probability of finding the particle in infinite space is one. I don't get why do we normalise and how do we normalise(I have not taken up statistics course). It would also be benificial if you can provide me with external links.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
indeterminate said:
why do we normalise

If the wave function ψ is normalized, then we can calculate the probability that the particle lies between x=a and x=b (in the one-dimensional case) simply by evaluating the integral $$P(a \leq x \leq b) = \int^b_a {\psi^*\psi dx}$$

and how do we normalise

An un-normalized ψ has an arbitrary constant overall multiplicative factor, call it A. For example, we might have $$\psi(x) = Ae^{-x^2}$$ To normalize ψ, we find the value of A that makes this equation true: $$\int^{+\infty}_{-\infty} {\psi^*\psi dx} = 1$$ That is, we evaluate the integral, whose result must include a factor of A2, solve the equation for A, and finally substitute our newly-found value of A back into the original formula for ψ.
 
Last edited:
so, basically normalisation is a technique which helps in mathematical calculations of probability. It has no physical significance in the wave equation.
 
indeterminate said:
so, basically normalisation is a technique which helps in mathematical calculations of probability. It has no physical significance in the wave equation.
As long as you always evaluate expectation values as [tex]\langle A\rangle = \frac{\langle \Psi|\hat A|\Psi\rangle}{\langle\Psi|\Psi|\rangle},[/tex]
then yes, that is a valid perspective---but not one shared by all instructors, so be careful in examinations. But in any case, note that the wave function property of being normalizable (not normalized) can have important consequences.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K