Normalization of 4-velocity in general relativity

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The normalization of 4-velocity in general relativity is expressed as gμν Uμ Uν = -1, which generalizes the Minkowski space relation ημν Uμ Uν = -1. This generalization is justified by the correspondence principle, indicating that general relativity locally resembles special relativity. An example using the Schwarzschild metric illustrates that the 4-velocity of a stationary observer at radius r is Uμ = (1/√(1-Rs/r), 0, 0, 0), demonstrating the dependence of time evolution on spatial curvature.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of 4-vectors in physics
  • Familiarity with the Schwarzschild metric
  • Knowledge of general relativity principles
  • Basic grasp of tensor notation and operations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the Schwarzschild metric in detail
  • Learn about the correspondence principle in general relativity
  • Explore the implications of 4-velocity in curved spacetime
  • Investigate the effects of gravitational time dilation on observers
USEFUL FOR

Students and researchers in theoretical physics, particularly those focused on general relativity, cosmology, and the mathematical foundations of spacetime physics.

  • #31
It seems that you are treating R as a constant, but I still don't see how to use
jmlaniel said:
\bar{t} = t \sqrt{1-R_s/R}

\bar{r} = \frac{r}{\sqrt{1-R_s/R}}

to go from
jmlaniel said:
Here is the "standard" Schawzschild metric :

ds^2 = -\left( 1-R_s/r \right) dt^2 + \left( 1-R_s/r \right)^{-1} dr^2 + r^2 d\Omega^2

to
jmlaniel said:
then I get the following metric :

ds^2 = -\frac{(1-R_s/\bar{r})}{(1-R_s/R)} d\bar{t}^2 + \frac{(1-R_s/R)}{(1-R_s/\bar{r})}d\bar{r}^2 + \bar{r}^2 (1-R_s/R) d\Omega^2

For example, using

dt = \frac{d\bar{t}}{\sqrt{1-R_s/R}}

r = \bar{r} \sqrt{1-R_s/R}

in the first term of the standard Schwarzschild metric gives

\left( 1-R_s/r \right) dt^2 = \frac{\left( 1 - \frac{R_s}{\bar{r} \sqrt{1-R_s/R}} \right)}{1-R_s/R} d\bar{t}^2 .
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
jmlaniel said:
Here are my new variables :

\bar{t} = t \sqrt{1-R_s/R}

\bar{r} = \frac{r}{\sqrt{1-R_s/R}}

then I get the following metric :

ds^2 = -\frac{(1-R_s/\bar{r})}{(1-R_s/R)} d\bar{t}^2 + \frac{(1-R_s/R)}{(1-R_s/\bar{r})}d\bar{r}^2 + \bar{r}^2 (1-R_s/R) d\Omega^2

But, like George, I don't understand how this is obtained by the transformation proposed above. Nor do I get the meaning of R in your equations. It is most likely that a factor (\sqrt{1-R_s/R}}) is missing in the denominator of R/\bar{r} from the time component of the metric.

AB
 
  • #33
I have to agree with George and Altabeh... I did not see the effect of the new r in the metric factor. My solution is entirely wrong :frown: But thanks a lot for pointing it out!

I have tried for the last hour to find a way to fix this and I am unable to do so. I will have to conlude that kev metric is suspicious... Unless anybody can find a way to justify this metric, I will have to say that it is imposisble to get from the standard Schwarzschild metric with a change of variable.

I really tried to accept this metric, but I can figure it out.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
661
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 76 ·
3
Replies
76
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K