Normalization of Radial wavefunction of hydrogen atom

Click For Summary
To evaluate the normalization coefficient for the radial wavefunction of the hydrogen atom, the generating function for Laguerre polynomials can be utilized, as referenced in Pauling and Wilson's text. There is a discussion about the presence of a minus sign in the normalized wavefunction, with clarification that wavefunctions can be multiplied by a phase factor without affecting observables. The transformation of the function f(ρ) is explored, specifically replacing ρ with (2ρ) and incorporating a factor of (-1)^{2l+1}, which is connected to the associated Laguerre polynomial's properties. The confusion regarding the normalization coefficient and the Condon-Shortley phase factor is addressed, emphasizing that multiplying by constants not dependent on ρ is permissible. Understanding these aspects is crucial for accurately determining the shape and normalization of the wavefunction.
Arafat Sagar
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
All I need to evaluate the normalization coefficient. I need a step by step guide. It will be a great help if someone please tell me where can i get the solution (with intermediate steps). I think the solution can be done using the orthogonal properties of associated Laguerre polynomial. I need the steps. Thanks.
 

Attachments

  • NormHydRad.png
    NormHydRad.png
    4.6 KB · Views: 5,508
Physics news on Phys.org
thanks a lot. the book contains the solution. but i still have one more confusion. the radial wavefunction (normalized) in the book has a minus sign. but i found many places where the minus sign has not been included. though the probability density requires the mod square of ψ, i want to know the shape of ψ. hence, what is the real value of it? should i include minus sign?
 

Attachments

  • radWavfunc.png
    radWavfunc.png
    10 KB · Views: 1,048
Wavefunctions are always uncertain up to a phase. So you can multiply the wavefunction by -1, or in fact by any number of the form exp(i * phi) where phi is any real value, without changing any observables.
 
i have an equation,
f(ρ) = \rho^{l+1}e^{-\rho}\upsilon(2\rho)

i want to transform it to the following multiplying only the right hand side with (-1)^{2l+1}(2)^{l+1},
f(ρ) = (-1)^{2l+1}(2\rho)^{l+1}e^{-\rho}\upsilon(2\rho)

is it possible?

i want to use (2\rho)^{l+1} instead of \rho^{l+1}, because, the normalization coefficient normalizes with respect to ρ whatever the the function f(ρ) is. and (2)^{l+1} is not a function of ρ.

i want to multiply by (-1)^{2l+1}, because i found that if the associated Laguerre polynomial is AL^{2l+1}_{n+l}(x)=\frac{d^{2l+1}}{dx^{2l+1}}L^{}_{n+l}(x). now, in some places, i found A=1 and other places A=(-1)^{2l+1}. besides, is it something related to Condon-Shortley Phase factor?
as after multiplyng by anything which is not a function of \rho will still satisfy the associated laguerre differential equation, can i do this multiplication of (-1)^{2l+1}(2)^{l+1}? thanks.
 
Last edited:
Time reversal invariant Hamiltonians must satisfy ##[H,\Theta]=0## where ##\Theta## is time reversal operator. However, in some texts (for example see Many-body Quantum Theory in Condensed Matter Physics an introduction, HENRIK BRUUS and KARSTEN FLENSBERG, Corrected version: 14 January 2016, section 7.1.4) the time reversal invariant condition is introduced as ##H=H^*##. How these two conditions are identical?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
601
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K