Not Another, Gosh: Vanuatu hit by large quake

  • Thread starter Thread starter StevieTNZ
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

A 7.0 magnitude earthquake struck near Vanuatu, specifically 1 km southeast of Norsup, at a depth of 10 km shortly after 7:30 AM NZ time. The earthquake occurred in a seismically active region characterized by a subduction zone, where the seafloor is diving beneath the land. Despite perceptions of increasing earthquake frequency, statistical data indicates that the annual average of significant earthquakes has remained stable over the past century, with approximately 18 events of magnitude 7.0 to 7.9 occurring each year.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of seismic activity and earthquake measurement scales (e.g., Richter scale)
  • Familiarity with subduction zones and tectonic plate boundaries
  • Knowledge of earthquake detection technology and reporting (e.g., USGS)
  • Awareness of tsunami risk assessment related to seismic events
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the geological characteristics of subduction zones and their impact on seismic activity.
  • Learn about earthquake prediction methods and the role of technology in monitoring seismic events.
  • Investigate the historical frequency of earthquakes in the Vanuatu region and compare it with global trends.
  • Explore tsunami warning systems and their effectiveness in response to seismic events.
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for seismologists, geologists, disaster response planners, and anyone interested in understanding seismic activity and its implications for regions like Vanuatu.

StevieTNZ
Messages
1,944
Reaction score
837
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: ProfuselyQuarky
Earth sciences news on Phys.org
Ugh . . . large magnitude earthquakes are becoming more and more common.
 
As our detection technology gets better and as our population (and therefore technologists) become more numerous, it does seem as if things once uncommon are now appearing more frequently. However, a quick look at the stats usually dispels this feeling. And, of course, we do have flurries of activity at almost every level.
 
True, but you don't need detection technology to notice a 7.0 magnitude earthquake :) Just sayin'.

I get what you're saying, though.
 
ProfuselyQuarky said:
Ugh . . . large magnitude earthquakes are becoming more and more common.

no they are not ... the yearly averages haven't changed in the last 100 or so years

ON avg. there are around 18 x M7.0 - 7.9 events each year, that equals 1 event in that range every 21 days
for M 8.0 and greater 1 per year. Some years see 2 x M8+ events other years there are noneDave
 
StevieTNZ said:
http://www.stuff.co.nz/world/south-pacific/79430986/vanuatu-hit-by-large-quake

Happened ~30 mins ago, so information still coming in.

Hi Stevie

Yup, the Vanuatu area is keeping its name as a very seismically active region
This latest M 7.0 was onshore in the centre of the Island Archipelago, and this meant that a tsunami was unlikely

The distance from recent large events to the north of this one make it a new separate event rather than an aftershock.

2016-04 Vanuatu Event 2.JPG
cheers
Dave
 
Connecting the dots, is this a fault line?
 
MRBlizzard said:
Connecting the dots, is this a fault line?

Hi there

not in this case, the events ... main shock and aftershock events are actually showing the direction that the fault line dips at

The main fault line, that is, the plate boundary, is shown by the red line running roughly north - south in the above pic
This region is a subduction zone with seafloor west ( left) of that red line, diving down under the seafloor/land to the east (right) of the line

so in cross-section we see something like this ...
( a very quick and rough drawing) not to scale but will give you the idea :smile:
subduction.GIF


The black dots being the quakes
cheers
Dave
 
  • #10
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: davenn

Similar threads

  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 41 ·
2
Replies
41
Views
12K