Not homework, but question about pushing over a heavy slab at rest

  • Thread starter Thread starter wildside50
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Homework Rest
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on calculating the force required to tip over a large granite slab measuring 8 feet high, 4 feet across, and 2 feet thick. The calculations indicate that a torque of 28,224 N*m is necessary to overcome gravity, resulting in a required force of 11,760 N when pushing from the top of the slab. The analysis also highlights that reducing the thickness of the slab decreases the force needed to tip it, with a 6-inch thick slab requiring 2,987 N. The conversation emphasizes the importance of mass, lever arm height, and friction in determining the feasibility of tipping the slab.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of torque and rotational mechanics
  • Knowledge of force calculations in physics
  • Familiarity with the properties of materials, specifically granite density
  • Basic grasp of frictional forces and their impact on motion
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the principles of torque and how to calculate it accurately
  • Study the effects of material density on force requirements in physics
  • Explore the concept of friction and its role in tipping objects
  • Learn about the mechanics of levers and their applications in real-world scenarios
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, engineers, and anyone interested in mechanics and the principles of force and motion in practical applications.

wildside50
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



So the concept is, you've got a very large slab of stone. For arguments sake, let's say it's about 8 feet high, 4 feet across, and 2 feet thick. How much force would it take to push the slab over, pushing at the top for maximum torque. If granite weighs about 165 lbs/cubic ft, would a human be able to push this object over? How about if it was only 1 foot thick, or 6" thick?

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



I tried some things using torque but I think I was way off. I took one of the bottom edges as the point of rotation and using the thickness of the slab as the radius, and multiplying by the force of gravity, I got a torque, namely 9.8m/s * 4800 kg * .6 m, and used that resulting torque as the required torque to oppose gravity and rotate the object about that edge. That resulted in a very large # of 28224 N*m. This torque I then set equal to the unknown force time the height of slab (the new rotational edge) getting F = 28224 N*m / 2.4 m = 11760 N. That seems huge. That means even if the object were 100 feet tall and still weighed the same, it would take 940 N of force to tip it. Or if the base was 6" instead of 2', it would still take 2987 N. That still seems like a big number, as in my mind a 100 ft tall object with a 2 ft base would be highly unstable. Am I taking a completely wrong approach to sovling this or are those #'s right?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Another thing to keep in mind is that there will be a point of thickness will be too great, and the object will simply slide rather than tip over. Additionally, as you have noted, the less thickness there is the easier it will be to push the slab over, which is due to less mass and less points of contact for frictional effects opposing you pushing the slab over.

Here are things at work:
1) The mass of the object. It is easier to push a less massive object than a more massive object. Granite is very dense and will become to massive for a human pretty quick. Imagine the opposite scenario, of say paper, and the dimensional effects are easy to visualize.
2) The lever arm height. "Give me a lever long enough and I will move the world." (Or something like that.) The further away from the pivot you can push, the more torque you will get.

I don't really want to work out the numbers, but 8 feet high will give a pretty good lever arm compared to the two feet of thickness. I think it is possible for a human to be able to do it.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 37 ·
2
Replies
37
Views
7K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
5K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
5K