Notation for partial derivatives using indexes

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the notation for partial derivatives using indexes, specifically addressing the representation of the third partial derivative with respect to the second argument of a function. It highlights the use of multi-index notation, such as $$\partial_2^3 f$$, and the complexities that arise when incorporating superscripts and subscripts, which can lead to confusion similar to tensor notation. The conversation also references the Wikipedia page on multi-index notation, emphasizing the need for clarity when dealing with functions that have unequal mixed partials and multiple variables.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of partial derivatives and their notation
  • Familiarity with multi-index notation in calculus
  • Basic knowledge of tensor notation and its implications
  • Experience with functions of multiple variables
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the application of multi-index notation in advanced calculus
  • Explore the relationship between partial derivatives and tensor calculus
  • Study the implications of unequal mixed partials in mathematical functions
  • Learn about the use of delimiters in complex mathematical expressions
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physicists, and students studying advanced calculus or tensor analysis who seek to understand the complexities of partial derivative notation and its applications in multi-variable functions.

Stephen Tashi
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Education Advisor
Messages
7,864
Reaction score
1,605
Is there a standard notation for partial derivatives that uses indexes instead of letters to denote ideas such as the 3 rd partial derivative with respect to the the 2nd argument of a function?

As soon as a symbol gets superscripts and subscripts like \partial_{2,1}^{3,1} \ f the spectre of tensors appears. Is a particular choice of what the super and subscripts mean consistent with the idea of tensors? Or are tensors irrelevant?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Taking the 3rd partial wrt the second argument would be:

$$\frac{\partial^3}{\partial x_2^3}f(\vec{x})\; : \vec{x}=(x_1,x_2,\cdots)$$
Which, indeed, simplifies to:
$$\partial_2^3 f$$
You do have to be careful ... what would ##\partial_\mu f^\mu## mean?
When you get mor subscripts and superscripts you may need to use some sort of delimiter to keep the roles separate.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multi-index_notation
 
Last edited:
Yes, one of which uses superscript list to denote differentiations f^(i,j,k) is the ith derivative w/respect 1st variable jth w/respect second and so on. Naturally this is problematic for functions with unequal mixed partials.

$$f^{(0,3)}=\dfrac{\partial ^3}{\partial x_2^3}f$$

$$f^{(11,17)}=\dfrac{\partial ^{17}}{\partial x_2^{17}} \dfrac{\partial ^{11}}{\partial x_1^{11}} f$$

it is also a problem for functions with many variables so we can use a multilist

$$f^{((70352,3),(1924518,2))}=\dfrac{\partial ^{2}}{\partial x_{1924518}^{2}} \dfrac{\partial ^3}{\partial x_{70352}^3} f$$
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
6K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
797
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 124 ·
5
Replies
124
Views
10K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K