Notation for special summations

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter epkid08
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Notation
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
2 replies · 2K views
epkid08
Messages
264
Reaction score
1
Is there special notation for a function like this:
[tex]g(x_1)=\sum^k_jf(x)[/tex]

[tex]g(x_2)=\sum^p_k\sum^k_jf(x)[/tex]

[tex]g(x_3)=\sum^s_p\sum^p_k\sum^k_jf(x)[/tex]

If so, what would g(x_n) be?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I forgot to add, a function like this:

[tex]f(x_n)=\sum^{\sum^{\sum^{\sum^{\sum}}}}...[/tex]

(the limit of each sum is another sum; fallowing the pattern in the above post of course)
 
For a small, finite number of indexes, sometimes I see the shorthand

[tex]\sum_{i,j,k} f(x)[/tex]

This usually occurs when all of the indexes run from 0 to the same limit N.

If you have a variable number of indexes, then you can "index the indexes" as follows:

[tex]S_n = \sum_{i_1 \dots i_n} f(x)[/tex]

Oh, wait, I see you want each index to run up to the previous index. For a small number of indexes, you can do

[tex]S_3 = \sum^N_{i > j > k} a_{ijk}(x)[/tex]

And in general, you could probably write

[tex]S_n = \sum^N_{i_1 > \dots > i_n} a_{i_1 \dots i_n}(x)[/tex]