Notation issue with the integration of exponents.

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the integration of the expression \(\int_{0}^{\infty} \exp((\iota\omega - \alpha)t) dt\). The author highlights a notation issue where using \((\iota \omega - \alpha)t\) leads to an infinite result, while rewriting it as \(-(\alpha - \iota \omega)t\) yields a finite answer. The key conclusion is that the integral converges only when the coefficient \(a\) in \(\exp(at)\) is negative, specifically when \(\alpha > \iota \omega\).

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of complex numbers and notation, particularly \(\iota\) for the imaginary unit.
  • Familiarity with integral calculus, specifically improper integrals.
  • Knowledge of convergence criteria for integrals involving exponential functions.
  • Basic grasp of limits and their application in calculus.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the convergence of improper integrals, focusing on conditions for exponential functions.
  • Explore the properties of complex exponentials in integration.
  • Learn about the implications of changing variable notations in calculus.
  • Investigate the use of contour integration in complex analysis for similar integrals.
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physics students, and anyone involved in advanced calculus or complex analysis who seeks to understand integration techniques and convergence criteria.

Fallen Seraph
Messages
32
Reaction score
0
I'll not go into the details of the full question, because they are irrelevant to my problem.
Basically I have to integrate
[tex]\int_{0}^{\infty} exp (\iota\omega-\alpha)t dt[/tex]

Which is a nice and easy integration, but it's putting in the limits that bothers me.

I simply wrote the exponent as [tex]((\iota \omega - \alpha)t)[/tex] because I didn't feel like writing an extra minus sign. I see no reason why I could not have written it

[tex](-( \alpha -\iota \omega )t)[/tex]

Which gives a finite answer when putting in the limits, whereas the first way of writing it gives an infinite answer. Could someone explain why one of these notations are incorrect?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Integral[0, inf] exp(at)dt converges, i.e., has a finite value only when a<0.
 

Similar threads

Replies
46
Views
7K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 70 ·
3
Replies
70
Views
6K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
3K