Notational problem in tensor calculus

Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
4 replies · 3K views
jacobrhcp
Messages
164
Reaction score
0
Using the Einstein convention, is this about right? (indexes run from 1 to 3):

[tex]\nabla\bullet(x_{i}a)=div(x_{i}a)=\partial_{j}a_{j}x_{i}=3x_{i}[/tex]
 
Physics news on Phys.org
it's said x above the exercises [tex]\partial_{j}=\frac{\partial}{\partial x_{j}}}[/tex]

and the question is:

calculate explicitly: [tex]\nabla \bullet (x_{i}\vec{a})[/tex], where a is a constant vector...

my attempt is way off, but I don't feel at home in these new symbols enough to get the right answer.
 
Last edited:
[tex]x_i{\vec a}[/tex] is not clear notation. Does it mean the i component of a tensor
[xa], or does it mean [tex]{\vec\hat i}\cdot{\vec r}{\vec a}[/tex]?
 
jacobrhcp said:
Using the Einstein convention, is this about right? (indexes run from 1 to 3):

[tex]\nabla\bullet(x_{i}a)=div(x_{i}a)=\partial_{j}a_{j}x_{i}=3x_{i}[/tex]

You are right that it means [tex]\partial_{j} (a_{j}x_{i})[/tex] But the components of a are constants so this is equal to [tex]a_j \partial_{j} x_{i}[/tex] Now, what does [tex]\partial_{j} x_{i}[/tex]give ?