Nuclear force tensor operator expectation value.

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around finding the expectation value of the tensor operator \( S_{12} \) for a system of two nucleons with total spin \( S = 1 \) and \( M_s = +1 \). The operator \( S_{12} \) is part of the one-pion exchange nuclear potential and involves Pauli spin matrices.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the evaluation of the spin part of the matrix element \( \chi_{spin}^* S_{12} \chi_{spin} \) without integrating over space. Questions arise regarding the dependence of the expectation value on angular momentum and the implications of the \( Y_{20} \) term.

Discussion Status

Some participants suggest that the initial question may focus solely on the spin part of the matrix element. There is an ongoing exploration of how the orbital angular momentum quantum numbers relate to the non-zero spatial integration, with references to spherical harmonics and Wigner 3j-symbols. The significance of the integral in relation to transition probabilities is also being discussed.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the potential constraints of homework rules and the need for clarity on the implications of the expectation value results. There is an acknowledgment of the complexity of the quantum mechanics involved, particularly regarding angular momentum transitions.

AntiElephant
Messages
25
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I have a question asking me to find the expectation value of S_{12} for a system of two nucleons in a state with total spin S = 1 and M_s = +1, where S_{12} is the tensor operator inside the one-pion exchange nuclear potential operator, equal to

S_{12} = \frac{3}{r^2}(\sigma^{(1)}\cdot r)(\sigma^{(2)}\cdot r) - \sigma^{(1)} \cdot \sigma^{(2)}

Where the sigma are the pauli spin matrices.

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution



What I personally would've done would note that the system is in a state \Psi = \psi_{space}\chi_{spin}, where \chi_{spin} = \alpha(1)\alpha(2) and then just have done

\int \Psi^* S_{12} \Psi dV = \int |\psi_{space}|^2 \chi_{spin}^* S_{12} \chi_{spin} dV

So my problem would lie in calculating \chi_{spin}^* S_{12} \chi_{spin} and then evaluating the integral. However, my answer says that the expectation value is simply given by

\chi_{spin}^* S_{12} \chi_{spin}

Why is there no integral over the whole of space? The answer doesn't make sense to me because it comes out as;

\chi_{spin}^* S_{12} \chi_{spin} \propto Y_{20}(\theta,\phi)

So my expectation value depends on the angles between the two nucleons? How can that make any sense? Has my answer forgotten to neglect the then integral over all space?

Lastly, my answer says that because the expectation value has a Y_{20} term that the operator can transfer 2 units of angular momentum to the orbital motion of the particles. My quantum mechanics knowledge must be lacking because I don't exactly see why this is the case, can anyone link my to a place where I can read up more about what expectation value results mean?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello, AntiElephant.

I wonder if the first part of the question is just asking you to evaluate the spin part of the matrix element. That is, they just want you to evaluate ## \chi_{spin}^* S_{12} \chi_{spin}##.

Now suppose you consider the matrix element \int \Psi_f^* S_{12} \Psi_i dV between two different states ##\Psi_i## and ##\Psi_f##. Suppose each state has the same total nucleon spin of S = 1, Ms = +1. But, suppose the spatial part of ##\Psi_i ## has orbital angular momentum quantum number ##l_i## and ##\Psi_f ## has orbital angular momentum number ##l_f##.

How should ##l_i## and ##l_f## be related in order for the spatial part of the integration to be nonzero (taking into account that the spin matrix element is going to throw in a factor of Y20)?

It might help to look at equations (13) through (17) here:http://mathworld.wolfram.com/SphericalHarmonic.html
 
TSny said:
Hello, AntiElephant.

I wonder if the first part of the question is just asking you to evaluate the spin part of the matrix element. That is, they just want you to evaluate ## \chi_{spin}^* S_{12} \chi_{spin}##.

Now suppose you consider the matrix element \int \Psi_f^* S_{12} \Psi_i dV between two different states ##\Psi_i## and ##\Psi_f##. Suppose each state has the same total nucleon spin of S = 1, Ms = +1. But, suppose the spatial part of ##\Psi_i ## has orbital angular momentum quantum number ##l_i## and ##\Psi_f ## has orbital angular momentum number ##l_f##.

How should ##l_i## and ##l_f## be related in order for the spatial part of the integration to be nonzero (taking into account that the spin matrix element is going to throw in a factor of Y20)?

It might help to look at equations (13) through (17) here:http://mathworld.wolfram.com/SphericalHarmonic.html

Thanks for the reply. Each spatial term has a spherical harmonic, for instance inside \Psi_f there is Y_{L_f, m_f}. I can see looking at (13) through (17) any change in angular momentum outside of -2 \leq \Delta L \leq 2 gives that integral equal to zero. I feel like it should make the \Delta L = -1, 1 states go to zero but I can't see anything from the Wigner 3j-symbols which imply that is the case.

But, forgive me for asking, what is the significance of \int \Psi_f^* S_{12} \Psi_i dV? If I were to hazard a guess it's related to Fermi's Golden rule. The nuclear potential V(r) has S_{12} inside it and the probability per second of the potential transitioning the 2-nucleon system from a initial state \Psi_i to a final state \Psi_f is given by

T \propto \int \Psi_f^* V(r) \Psi_i dV \propto \int \Psi_f^* S_{12} \Psi_i dV

Hence any transition with |\Delta L| \geq 3 has a zero-chance of happening. But |\Delta L| \leq 2 has a (possibly) non-zero chance of occurring. Is this correct?
 
Silversonic said:
Thanks for the reply. Each spatial term has a spherical harmonic, for instance inside \Psi_f there is Y_{L_f, m_f}. I can see looking at (13) through (17) any change in angular momentum outside of -2 \leq \Delta L \leq 2 gives that integral equal to zero. I feel like it should make the \Delta L = -1, 1 states go to zero but I can't see anything from the Wigner 3j-symbols which imply that is the case.
According to equation 13 at http://mathworld.wolfram.com/SphericalHarmonic.html, you will have a factor of the 3j symbol

## \left( \begin{array}{ccc}
l_1 & l_2 & l_3 \\
0 & 0 & 0 \end{array} \right) ##

If you look at symmetry property (6) at this link: http://mathworld.wolfram.com/Wigner3j-Symbol.html I think you can see why the above symbol yields zero for ##|\Delta L | = 1##. (Here, ##\Delta L = l_3-l_1##; and ##l_2## = 2 corresponds to ##Y_{2,0}##.)

But, forgive me for asking, what is the significance of \int \Psi_f^* S_{12} \Psi_i dV? If I were to hazard a guess it's related to Fermi's Golden rule. The nuclear potential V(r) has S_{12} inside it and the probability per second of the potential transitioning the 2-nucleon system from a initial state \Psi_i to a final state \Psi_f is given by

T \propto \int \Psi_f^* V(r) \Psi_i dV \propto \int \Psi_f^* S_{12} \Psi_i dV

Hence any transition with |\Delta L| \geq 3 has a zero-chance of happening. But |\Delta L| \leq 2 has a (possibly) non-zero chance of occurring. Is this correct?

Yes, I think that's right. If the Hamiltonian has nonzero matrix elements between two states, then there can generally be transitions between those states.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
Thanks for the help.

(Swapped accounts)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K