Nuclear force tensor operator expectation value.

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on calculating the expectation value of the tensor operator \( S_{12} \) for a two-nucleon system with total spin \( S = 1 \) and \( M_s = +1 \). The operator \( S_{12} \) is defined as \( S_{12} = \frac{3}{r^2}(\sigma^{(1)}\cdot r)(\sigma^{(2)}\cdot r) - \sigma^{(1)} \cdot \sigma^{(2)} \), where the \( \sigma \) are Pauli spin matrices. Participants clarify that the expectation value can be computed directly as \( \chi_{spin}^* S_{12} \chi_{spin} \) without integrating over space, leading to a dependence on the angles between the nucleons. The significance of the \( Y_{20} \) term in the expectation value indicates that the operator can transfer two units of angular momentum to the orbital motion of the particles.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics, specifically angular momentum and spin states.
  • Familiarity with tensor operators in quantum mechanics.
  • Knowledge of spherical harmonics and their properties.
  • Proficiency in evaluating matrix elements in quantum mechanics.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of tensor operators in quantum mechanics.
  • Learn about spherical harmonics and their role in angular momentum coupling.
  • Research Fermi's Golden Rule and its application in transition probabilities.
  • Explore the significance of Wigner 3j-symbols in angular momentum theory.
USEFUL FOR

Students and researchers in quantum mechanics, particularly those focusing on nuclear physics and the behavior of two-nucleon systems. This discussion is also beneficial for anyone studying angular momentum coupling and tensor operators.

AntiElephant
Messages
25
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I have a question asking me to find the expectation value of S_{12} for a system of two nucleons in a state with total spin S = 1 and M_s = +1, where S_{12} is the tensor operator inside the one-pion exchange nuclear potential operator, equal to

S_{12} = \frac{3}{r^2}(\sigma^{(1)}\cdot r)(\sigma^{(2)}\cdot r) - \sigma^{(1)} \cdot \sigma^{(2)}

Where the sigma are the pauli spin matrices.

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution



What I personally would've done would note that the system is in a state \Psi = \psi_{space}\chi_{spin}, where \chi_{spin} = \alpha(1)\alpha(2) and then just have done

\int \Psi^* S_{12} \Psi dV = \int |\psi_{space}|^2 \chi_{spin}^* S_{12} \chi_{spin} dV

So my problem would lie in calculating \chi_{spin}^* S_{12} \chi_{spin} and then evaluating the integral. However, my answer says that the expectation value is simply given by

\chi_{spin}^* S_{12} \chi_{spin}

Why is there no integral over the whole of space? The answer doesn't make sense to me because it comes out as;

\chi_{spin}^* S_{12} \chi_{spin} \propto Y_{20}(\theta,\phi)

So my expectation value depends on the angles between the two nucleons? How can that make any sense? Has my answer forgotten to neglect the then integral over all space?

Lastly, my answer says that because the expectation value has a Y_{20} term that the operator can transfer 2 units of angular momentum to the orbital motion of the particles. My quantum mechanics knowledge must be lacking because I don't exactly see why this is the case, can anyone link my to a place where I can read up more about what expectation value results mean?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello, AntiElephant.

I wonder if the first part of the question is just asking you to evaluate the spin part of the matrix element. That is, they just want you to evaluate ## \chi_{spin}^* S_{12} \chi_{spin}##.

Now suppose you consider the matrix element \int \Psi_f^* S_{12} \Psi_i dV between two different states ##\Psi_i## and ##\Psi_f##. Suppose each state has the same total nucleon spin of S = 1, Ms = +1. But, suppose the spatial part of ##\Psi_i ## has orbital angular momentum quantum number ##l_i## and ##\Psi_f ## has orbital angular momentum number ##l_f##.

How should ##l_i## and ##l_f## be related in order for the spatial part of the integration to be nonzero (taking into account that the spin matrix element is going to throw in a factor of Y20)?

It might help to look at equations (13) through (17) here:http://mathworld.wolfram.com/SphericalHarmonic.html
 
TSny said:
Hello, AntiElephant.

I wonder if the first part of the question is just asking you to evaluate the spin part of the matrix element. That is, they just want you to evaluate ## \chi_{spin}^* S_{12} \chi_{spin}##.

Now suppose you consider the matrix element \int \Psi_f^* S_{12} \Psi_i dV between two different states ##\Psi_i## and ##\Psi_f##. Suppose each state has the same total nucleon spin of S = 1, Ms = +1. But, suppose the spatial part of ##\Psi_i ## has orbital angular momentum quantum number ##l_i## and ##\Psi_f ## has orbital angular momentum number ##l_f##.

How should ##l_i## and ##l_f## be related in order for the spatial part of the integration to be nonzero (taking into account that the spin matrix element is going to throw in a factor of Y20)?

It might help to look at equations (13) through (17) here:http://mathworld.wolfram.com/SphericalHarmonic.html

Thanks for the reply. Each spatial term has a spherical harmonic, for instance inside \Psi_f there is Y_{L_f, m_f}. I can see looking at (13) through (17) any change in angular momentum outside of -2 \leq \Delta L \leq 2 gives that integral equal to zero. I feel like it should make the \Delta L = -1, 1 states go to zero but I can't see anything from the Wigner 3j-symbols which imply that is the case.

But, forgive me for asking, what is the significance of \int \Psi_f^* S_{12} \Psi_i dV? If I were to hazard a guess it's related to Fermi's Golden rule. The nuclear potential V(r) has S_{12} inside it and the probability per second of the potential transitioning the 2-nucleon system from a initial state \Psi_i to a final state \Psi_f is given by

T \propto \int \Psi_f^* V(r) \Psi_i dV \propto \int \Psi_f^* S_{12} \Psi_i dV

Hence any transition with |\Delta L| \geq 3 has a zero-chance of happening. But |\Delta L| \leq 2 has a (possibly) non-zero chance of occurring. Is this correct?
 
Silversonic said:
Thanks for the reply. Each spatial term has a spherical harmonic, for instance inside \Psi_f there is Y_{L_f, m_f}. I can see looking at (13) through (17) any change in angular momentum outside of -2 \leq \Delta L \leq 2 gives that integral equal to zero. I feel like it should make the \Delta L = -1, 1 states go to zero but I can't see anything from the Wigner 3j-symbols which imply that is the case.
According to equation 13 at http://mathworld.wolfram.com/SphericalHarmonic.html, you will have a factor of the 3j symbol

## \left( \begin{array}{ccc}
l_1 & l_2 & l_3 \\
0 & 0 & 0 \end{array} \right) ##

If you look at symmetry property (6) at this link: http://mathworld.wolfram.com/Wigner3j-Symbol.html I think you can see why the above symbol yields zero for ##|\Delta L | = 1##. (Here, ##\Delta L = l_3-l_1##; and ##l_2## = 2 corresponds to ##Y_{2,0}##.)

But, forgive me for asking, what is the significance of \int \Psi_f^* S_{12} \Psi_i dV? If I were to hazard a guess it's related to Fermi's Golden rule. The nuclear potential V(r) has S_{12} inside it and the probability per second of the potential transitioning the 2-nucleon system from a initial state \Psi_i to a final state \Psi_f is given by

T \propto \int \Psi_f^* V(r) \Psi_i dV \propto \int \Psi_f^* S_{12} \Psi_i dV

Hence any transition with |\Delta L| \geq 3 has a zero-chance of happening. But |\Delta L| \leq 2 has a (possibly) non-zero chance of occurring. Is this correct?

Yes, I think that's right. If the Hamiltonian has nonzero matrix elements between two states, then there can generally be transitions between those states.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
Thanks for the help.

(Swapped accounts)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K