Nuclear Fusion_New Method_Patent Pending

  • Thread starter Thread starter Joseph Chikva
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Nuclear
Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around a patent-pending method of nuclear fusion, with participants expressing skepticism about its practicality and energy efficiency. Key concerns include the challenges of harnessing energy from fusion reactions and the high energy costs associated with accelerating particle beams. Some participants argue that achieving sustained fusion requires overcoming significant thermalization and scattering issues, while others suggest that the proposed method could potentially achieve near 100% fuel burning. The conversation also touches on the feasibility of building a working prototype and the implications of sharing ideas publicly on patentability. Overall, the viability of the method remains uncertain, with calls for further investigation and experimental validation.
  • #31
Joseph Chikva said:
I only would like to say that you are mistaken (some mistakes) during explanation of Polywell's working principle.

Which ones?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
  • #32
Drakkith said:
Which ones?
During the explanation when you talk about potencial well you told me about sizes.
To me is very difficult to explain you something. From one side my knowledge on Polywell is very limited, from another I should explain you what is e.g. the potential well cosists of.
I can not sorry.
I only catched that in Polywell are two groups of electrons interacting each other with different arranged velocities: nonzero and zero. So, conditions for two-stream instability.
 
  • #33
Joseph Chikva said:
During the explanation when you talk about potencial well you told me about sizes.
To me is very difficult to explain you something. From one side my knowledge on Polywell is very limited, from another I should explain you what is e.g. the potential well cosists of.
I can not sorry.
I only catched that in Polywell are two groups of electrons interacting each other with different arranged velocities: nonzero and zero. So, conditions for two-stream instability.

Take a look at the article I linked above and the wikipedia article on the polywell. That explains it all. The article MIGHT be in another language other than english, so if english isn't your 1st language then maybe that will help. Sorry I can't explain it to you!
 
  • #34
You are right. Sorry for my bad English.
I will try to understand better Polywell and in case of your wish we can then return to its discussion. May be in another thread.
Good luck.
 
  • #35
Drakkith said:
Take a look at the article I linked above and the wikipedia article on the polywell. That explains it all. The article MIGHT be in another language other than english, so if english isn't your 1st language then maybe that will help. Sorry I can't explain it to you!
Take a look at a link: http://www.fpgeneration.com/technology/index.html
One of the major obstacles that limits the fusion output in IEC devices is the result of repulsive electrostatic forces arising from the ions themselves.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #36
That should be changed to say: "One of the major obstacles that limits the fusion output of ALL devices is the result of repulsive electrostatic forces arising from the ions themselves"

Every design has to get around this repulsive force. That is the whole idea behind the reactor.
 
  • #37
Drakkith said:
Every design has to get around this repulsive force. That is the whole idea behind the reactor.
Sometimes people also try to get around physics laws. May be in Polywell's case too. I do not claim confidently but doubt that it's so.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
35
Views
6K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K