Nuclear Fusion_New Method_Patent Pending

  • Thread starter Thread starter Joseph Chikva
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Nuclear
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers around a patent-pending method of nuclear fusion that proposes using three independently created beams to achieve near 100% fuel burning-off. Participants express skepticism regarding the practicality of the method, particularly concerning energy efficiency and the challenges of maintaining stable plasma. Key points include the need for a longitudinal electric field to align particle velocities and the potential use of MHD principles for energy recycling. The conversation highlights the complexities of achieving sustained fusion reactions and the importance of addressing energy losses from non-fusing ions and electrons.

PREREQUISITES
  • Nuclear Fusion principles
  • Particle beam acceleration techniques
  • Magnetohydrodynamics (MHD)
  • Plasma physics and stability analysis
NEXT STEPS
  • Research advanced particle beam acceleration methods
  • Study the principles of MHD for energy recycling in fusion systems
  • Explore the implications of two-stream instability in plasma physics
  • Investigate existing fusion methods like Bussard's Polywell and Tokamak designs
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, nuclear engineers, and researchers interested in advanced fusion technologies and energy production methods.

  • #31
Joseph Chikva said:
I only would like to say that you are mistaken (some mistakes) during explanation of Polywell's working principle.

Which ones?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
  • #32
Drakkith said:
Which ones?
During the explanation when you talk about potencial well you told me about sizes.
To me is very difficult to explain you something. From one side my knowledge on Polywell is very limited, from another I should explain you what is e.g. the potential well cosists of.
I can not sorry.
I only catched that in Polywell are two groups of electrons interacting each other with different arranged velocities: nonzero and zero. So, conditions for two-stream instability.
 
  • #33
Joseph Chikva said:
During the explanation when you talk about potencial well you told me about sizes.
To me is very difficult to explain you something. From one side my knowledge on Polywell is very limited, from another I should explain you what is e.g. the potential well cosists of.
I can not sorry.
I only catched that in Polywell are two groups of electrons interacting each other with different arranged velocities: nonzero and zero. So, conditions for two-stream instability.

Take a look at the article I linked above and the wikipedia article on the polywell. That explains it all. The article MIGHT be in another language other than english, so if english isn't your 1st language then maybe that will help. Sorry I can't explain it to you!
 
  • #34
You are right. Sorry for my bad English.
I will try to understand better Polywell and in case of your wish we can then return to its discussion. May be in another thread.
Good luck.
 
  • #35
Drakkith said:
Take a look at the article I linked above and the wikipedia article on the polywell. That explains it all. The article MIGHT be in another language other than english, so if english isn't your 1st language then maybe that will help. Sorry I can't explain it to you!
Take a look at a link: http://www.fpgeneration.com/technology/index.html
One of the major obstacles that limits the fusion output in IEC devices is the result of repulsive electrostatic forces arising from the ions themselves.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #36
That should be changed to say: "One of the major obstacles that limits the fusion output of ALL devices is the result of repulsive electrostatic forces arising from the ions themselves"

Every design has to get around this repulsive force. That is the whole idea behind the reactor.
 
  • #37
Drakkith said:
Every design has to get around this repulsive force. That is the whole idea behind the reactor.
Sometimes people also try to get around physics laws. May be in Polywell's case too. I do not claim confidently but doubt that it's so.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
35
Views
7K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K