- #71
chroot
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
- 10,295
- 41
How is that comedic? Both neutrons and protons feel the strong force equally.
- Warren
- Warren
Please go find someone who knows something about Physics! and ask them! what kind of energy it would require to compact 55 PROTONS into a Small Compact mass, like an atoms nucleous...YIKES!chroot said:I said, many times, that if you were to squash 55 protons together closely enough, they would bind together due to the strong force. The resulting nucleus would very quickly decay, however.
- Warren
No, it would still take virtually the same energy to overcome the protons' coulomb repulsion. The neutrons don't change that; they just make the resulting nucleus stable.Mr. Robin Parsons said:Clearly you have no idea of what I am talking about because when you add neutrons, well, you can compact 55 protons together, really easily, into a very small compact mass, nature does it all the time!
Mr. Robin Parsons said:The quote is taken from http://www.cem.msu.edu/~cem181h/projects/98/deuterium/properties.htm
(Home page accreditation) <<This page was created for CEM 181H at Michigan State University in the Fall of 1998, taught by Dr. Marcos Dantus>>
As you too can read, the CHEMICAL PROPERTIES of Hydrogen/Water have changed because of the addition of a nucleon to the system, THE ISOTOPE that is deuterium HAS DIFFERENT CHEMICAL PROPERTIES Then HYDROGEN...
I would expect both of you, once again, to apologize to me, as both of you are Dead Wrong!...the Scientific evidence PROVES it...me? I'm just the guy you two like to insult, probably out of, what? fear?
BTW in reality I sincerely doubt that either of you can admit to the error, nor do I really have an expectation of any kind of apology from either of you, don't think that there is enough space, in you, to accommodate humilty.
Originally posted by me
No, that is not true. The chemical properties of a substance are completely determined by its electronic structure. The nuclear properties of a substance are completely determined by its...well...nulcear structure.
If you want proof of the separation between nuclear physics and chemistry, you have only to consider that different isotopes of the same atomic species have the same chemical properties but not the same nuclear properties, and that different ions of the same atomic species have the same nuclear properties but not the same chemical properties.
chroot: You could, in fact, press 55 Originally written a neutrons! protons Now changed edited to protons! together. The resulting nucleus would not be stable, however, and would quickly decay.
edit: I meant protons, but really it doesn't matter either way.
Robin: Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha do I love that reason for the edit line it "doesn't matter either way" WOW! just WOW!
jdavel said:This thread should be deleted (not locked, deleted) as should any thread started by MRP as soon as his attitude surfaces. He has nothing to contribute, and he doesn't ask questions to learn. He's only here to waste people's time with his idiotic posts.
Mr. Robin Parsons said:Bye! (go learn something, while you have the time, cause I don't want to bother wasting my time, responding to your, well, ego...)
chroot said:pallidin,
I would attempt to answer your questions, but I have no idea what you're asking.
- Warren